Topic: Thinking to Create - wallettalk (Read 363 times)
The idea that you have to send coins to your main wallet just to verify you own the wallet is just too absurd, he wants to hit two birds with one stone, monetize his idea, and at the same time exposing people's privacy, this is an idea that will not get support from the community, OP should go back to the drawing board go back learning privacy, and Cryptocurrency.
I would like to ask the intention of OP for planning to create this, what're his motives behind this, is he a part of a hacker group or working with them, asking for a piece of wallet information is a big no-no, he is literally asking our wallet information so he can expose it to hackers or those who are looking with bad intention, and he tries to sugarcoat his intention.
Business = money generated to him so there's no question about on why he create that since he can earn with those ideas if that one properly executed by him or his team if there is. But its kinda risky for personal privacy of the wallet holder so maybe he should do more secure and make the wallet holder information more anonymous since this is the most preferred by the users since security is the most important thing here.
I would like to ask the intention of OP for planning to create this, what're his motives behind this, is he a part of a hacker group or working with them, asking for a piece of wallet information is a big no-no, he is literally asking our wallet information so he can expose it to hackers or those who are looking with bad intention, and he tries to sugarcoat his intention.
Literally the opposite of what you should be advocating. If I listened to the rich of the world, I'd be even poorer than I am now. The rich usually look out for themselves, and make money off those less fortunate, I mean its the reason they are rich after all. They are more likely to give bias opinions, simply because it benefits them. Imagine, asking a whale what should I do when Bitcoin reaches x amount. They'll give the answer that mostly benefits them.
I'm obviously making a generalization. There are rich fellows out there, which have got their scoop of the pot, and don't look to exploit their ways to more gains, simply because they can.
I'm obviously making a generalization. There are rich fellows out there, which have got their scoop of the pot, and don't look to exploit their ways to more gains, simply because they can.
You don't need to create wallet talk because this forum already has the 'wallet software' section as you can see in the next link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=37.0
If you want to discourse any topic relevant to wallets then you can post there. And I agree with the other, creating wallet take will be a problem to the privacy of the users. No one wants to share relative information like that because it could be an attack vector.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=37.0
If you want to discourse any topic relevant to wallets then you can post there. And I agree with the other, creating wallet take will be a problem to the privacy of the users. No one wants to share relative information like that because it could be an attack vector.
Based on the idea that you want to materialize, you do not fully aware or knowledgeable about the core teaching of decentralization and privacy and obviously, you want to monetize by verifying each address by sending sats to the platform address every month, there's a lot of disadvantage for users and advantage for you as an owner because you will ask them coins, so they can build you their community, they do all the work and you get all the pay.
so after this if any user give any advice or talk or information , people can know how valuable this information by there Funds or holding time or vaule in verify address.
Since when does having more value to your wallet equal to being more knowledgeable to Bitcoin? I'm just saying you can be dumb and be an early adopter where you hoarded a bunch of BTC and still don't know shit about Bitcoin. I don't think that this kind of system where the more valuable your wallet address is the more you are treated as a "smart" person in the room, this will create some biases in your own website and as well be abused by these people with valuable wallet addresses, your forum won't simply be viewed for people who has real knowledge but who has the most influence because he is the richest.
You are just simply putting up yourself in trouble. Who the hell would really be considering on showing off their addresses? For what purpose?
There's no need to have some showdown on how much a certain user been holding because this is simply contradicting on the thing we are really aiming for which is "privacy"
So this idea is pure nonsense.
There's no need to have some showdown on how much a certain user been holding because this is simply contradicting on the thing we are really aiming for which is "privacy"
So this idea is pure nonsense.
The platform where people Post ,
We already do that in here.Like
To an extent, we also do that in here [some users tend to use the merit button as a like button [not what it was intended for but they still do]].or Talk as "wallet address owner".
Why? After reading all of your comments, I still can't find a single valid reason for such a thing [nonsensical].people can know how valuable this information by there Funds or holding time or vaule in verify address.
Someone else's worth shouldn't be measured by how thick their wallets are [same goes for any of their provided information on the internet].it'll add value to Project and Dev Team.
It'll add a different kind of thing as opposed to what should actually be described as "value".The way I'm seeing it, you've come up with a project idea for the wrong reasons [it won't succeed].
i appreciate your words
Thank you for all your opinion.
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
Maybe to add public 2FA related to users BTC address. So everyone should know the phone number of the Bitcoin address owner. SO other people can direct contact between themselves.
You got enough opinions here. Your idea is terrible and you better turn to something else. Here is no space for another "talk" project, especially not for paid service, find something more unique.
Bitcoin is synonymous with anonymity, you want to ask that people discover themselves there and still have to pay for it.
we never said have to pay for anything. it's only verify proceess. we can change to send back sats they send to same address they send. or also we looking to impliment sign to verify.
so don't get anything wrong. we are not making anything anothor talk project. we making total blockchain chats. we are implements 100 words chats maybe.
This is only thought. we are asking that people connect and give some ideas or problems. not slugs language to uninspiring Devs.
Thank you everyone.
Thank you for all your opinion.
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
Maybe to add public 2FA related to users BTC address. So everyone should know the phone number of the Bitcoin address owner. SO other people can direct contact between themselves.
You got enough opinions here. Your idea is terrible and you better turn to something else. Here is no space for another "talk" project, especially not for paid service, find something more unique.
Bitcoin is synonymous with anonymity, you want to ask that people discover themselves there and still have to pay for it.
I think a better name would be kidnappedtalk.
Thank you for all your opinion.
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
I suggest that you should grant “Legendary” rank and special badges to members who get listed here:
https://github.com/jlopp/physical-bitcoin-attacks
Also, if you need funding to get started, perhaps you should request sponsorship from Chainalysis. (If you don’t work for them already.)
The platform where people Post ,
We already do that in here.Like
To an extent, we also do that in here [some users tend to use the merit button as a like button [not what it was intended for but they still do]].or Talk as "wallet address owner".
Why? After reading all of your comments, I still can't find a single valid reason for such a thing [nonsensical].people can know how valuable this information by there Funds or holding time or vaule in verify address.
Someone else's worth shouldn't be measured by how thick their wallets are [same goes for any of their provided information on the internet].it'll add value to Project and Dev Team.
It'll add a different kind of thing as opposed to what should actually be described as "value".The way I'm seeing it, you've come up with a project idea for the wrong reasons [it won't succeed].
Who would ever join a project that will expose the privacy of his wallet and paying the owner of a project so I can post my opinion when we have a lot of forums that can give you that for free, I think the OP just wants to make money because of his greediness and wants to entice people to expose what's on their wallet.
Thank you for all your opinion.
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
Other users already pinpointed that there would be no chance that this must be implemented. A forum for providing one's information is just a way of showcasing other's how much you hold. This forum already has threads that claims that certain wallets are theirs and I don't think it really made an impact nor change in a healthy conversation. Lastly, there can be ways to pinpoint whom could be the owner of a certain wallet address, you can use ninjastic.space and paste an address there to know who's the user who've used it.
You really want the value or trustworthiness of what people share on the platform to be rated by the amount they have in their wallets, and how long they have been holding? By the way, what stops someone from sending sats to any random address with huge amounts of coins and claiming the fund as his/her own just to make his shared information valuable? Did you solve this problem?
Thinking to create wallettalk - The platform where people Post , Like or Talk as "wallet address owner".
so after this if any user give any advice or talk or information , people can know how valuable this information by there Funds or holding time or vaule in verify address.
User can create profile with there wallet address ( user must verify BTC address by sending small Sats amount to platform BTC address )
First start with BTC addresses ( later can add more blockchain)
First start with BTC addresses ( later can add more blockchain)
we can add user can verify account each month ( send sats amount to platform wallet address ) for secure and assure that they own that address.
Quote
Why the bloody hell would one want that? Paying for providing a proof to strangers that he/she still owns the address. It seems pretty stupid to me, whether you pay or not. Next time I'd advice you to re-think what you're planning to do and if it looks scammy, it won't attract many people. It was a good idea to propose it here, though. You should read others' opinion as well.
Ok sir Got it. will try to make more convenient
Thank you for all your opinion.
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
We Thinking More Deep into it from your Opinion.
More opinion welcome
I think a better name would be kidnappedtalk.
so after this if any user give any advice or talk or information , people can know how valuable this information by there Funds or holding time or vaule in verify address.
So you are saying that a whale's "information" is more valuable than an expert's "information" just because the whale has more money?!What are you going to do when some malicious person joined the platform with a lot of bitcoin? Like a market manipulator for example, or someone like Roger Ver?
What is loophole can be in this platform?
Not necessary as Bitcointalk already offers a whole section for it and not a lot of people actually discuss about wallets other than the occasional posts seeking help.The use of address staking on Bitcointalk is only for the event that you have to prove that you're still in control of the account.
Staking an address means that the owner should be responsible for their own address and keeps it secure. You don't have to send Bitcoins to anywhere, we don't care (rather, should not care) whether you own any Bitcoins or any altcoins. Sending sats periodically would be expensive and just spawns a bunch of practically useless outputs.
Thinking to create wallettalk - The platform where people Post , Like or Talk as "wallet address owner".
Wouldn't this ruin every wallet owner's privacy? Just saying.so after this if any user give any advice or talk or information , people can know how valuable this information by there Funds or holding time or vaule in verify address.
Since when a person User can create profile with there wallet address ( user must verify BTC address by sending small Sats amount to platform BTC address )
First start with BTC addresses ( later can add more blockchain)
Why do they have to verify it with that, expensive, way? Why can't they simply sign you a message from their address? It provides the same proof of ownership.First start with BTC addresses ( later can add more blockchain)
we can add user can verify account each month ( send sats amount to platform wallet address ) for secure and assure that they own that address.
Why the bloody hell would one want that? Paying for providing a proof to strangers that he/she still owns the address. It seems pretty stupid to me, whether you pay or not. Next time I'd advice you to re-think what you're planning to do and if it looks scammy, it won't attract many people. It was a good idea to propose it here, though. You should read others' opinion as well.
Thinking to create wallettalk - The platform where people Post , Like or Talk as "wallet address owner".
so after this if any user give any advice or talk or information , people can know how valuable this information by there Funds or holding time or vaule in verify address.
User can create profile with there wallet address ( user must verify BTC address by sending small Sats amount to platform BTC address )
First start with BTC addresses ( later can add more blockchain)
we can add user can verify account each month ( send sats amount to platform wallet address ) for secure and assure that they own that address.
What is loophole can be in this platform?
so after this if any user give any advice or talk or information , people can know how valuable this information by there Funds or holding time or vaule in verify address.
User can create profile with there wallet address ( user must verify BTC address by sending small Sats amount to platform BTC address )
First start with BTC addresses ( later can add more blockchain)
we can add user can verify account each month ( send sats amount to platform wallet address ) for secure and assure that they own that address.
What is loophole can be in this platform?
Jump to: