Topic: This is why you shouldn't vote Hilary (Read 4426 times)

Dwank to this a few times.  It will help you poke the correct touchscreen button on your Diebold electronic voting device when the time is right.

Hillary Is Rebirth.

Hillary Will Guide America to Revolution.

Hillary Will Cleanse the Rot.

Too wordy. That's why Ron fell flat on his face and Rand will, too. However, if you happen to end up working for the campaign in '15/'16, make sure randpaul2016.com points here: http://hillaryugly.com/

You can run a wordy one-minute television advertisement and waste bucket-loads of money, or just pay them to air various unflattering pictures of Hillary for a few seconds.

1 second:


1 second:


1 second (this is intentional):


2 seconds:

Well, that too!

One of the most cruel actions of the Head Honcho of The Left!

Yes. She is ugly. But that is just one of her less evil merits / demerits. For me, the fact that she took an active part in bombing the Serbian orphanages and old-age homes, is the number one reason to oppose her. She should be put in jail for the rest of her life for murdering innocent children in Serbia and other places.

I still say that the fact that she is pig ugly is reason enough on its face.

I'd say that there is no difference between the RINO and the D in the USA. The establishment Republicans have forgot the principles of their party, drifting too close to the Democratic lunacy. That's why someone like Rand Paul should win the Republican nomination.

there is no difference between R and D in USA
USA doesnt have choice......

Good news for Hillary.... and that means bad news for the ordinary Americans.

Lewinsky and Rove -- Good news for Hillary Clinton?

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/18/opinion/zelizer-hillary-clinton-good-news/

Hilary lost my support the first time I heard her cackle. I was like, "Goodness, she sounds like the Wicked Witch of the West's cousin or something."

And our gun rights, or any other rights, only mean a thing when we give a rip about them. The only way to get the attention of the Democrats and the Republicans (both parties have problems) is for everybody to just forget about being part of the Red Camp or the Blue Camp and vote for your favorite third party candidate. And I do mean EVERYBODY at this point. GO VOTE IN NOVEMBER!!!

No.  In the 90's I worked in the U.S. Congress and participated in many national elections.  Politicians don't "change" after elected.

There is a long, carefully designed vetting process which weeds out any politician who is not corrupt (does not follow orders).  It starts in law school when the person is young.  Honest politicians are culled out and discarded.  The higher a politician rises, the more dependable they have proven themselves.

Only problem is every candidate changes once they run for president, and then change again when they actually become president. Remember Obama's rhetoric? He sounded like the greatest guy ever who will fix all the problems. Then once he got into office, it's all the same bullshit as the presidents before him. Id rather have Warren where she is right now. She will get more done this way.

What if it was Elizabeth Warren and Jesse Ventura? 

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dream-ticket-2016-us-606706

Working for Ron Paul in 2007 is what cured me of electoral politics.

Same thing will happen with Rand; dangle the carrot in front of the slaves to keep their hope alive.

Like the carnival worker at the milk bottle game told me when I was in 8th grade:  "Aw shucks Kid.  You lost.  Try again!  Surely you'll do better this time".

I never did win that Van Halen poster, but after my money from mowing lawns was all gone, I learned a valuable lesson.

Some good news for Rand Paul... but this was more or less expected.

Rand Paul Leads Hillary Clinton in KY, NH, CO in Potential 2016 Matchup

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/378217/rand-paul-leads-hillary-clinton-ky-nh-co-potential-2016-matchup-eliana-johnson

I am prepared.

Have you ever heard of the Alcoholics Anonymous concept of "find your bottom"?  It means that a person will continue being an alcoholic until the negative consequences of that behavior become so severe they decide to stop drinking.

America is like a heroin addict.  Injecting heroin feels GREAT.  Unfortunately, artificially induced happiness is an unsustainable activity.  In America it feels great to run up the national credit card so millions of people can live luxuriously without working.

After the reset, all those people will return to reality.  The withdrawal symptoms of kicking heroin are extremely painful in the short term, but totally worth it in the long term.

i kinda prefer elizabeth warren. at least we'd start to see someone actually represent the people and hunt down wallstreet/bankers for wrecking our economy. but if she were the nominee, that would mean she'd have to "make deals" in order to fundraise, which means she'd just become a corporate billionaire.

There is no doubt who is the media's favorite. The same people who had attacked McCain in 2008 (for being too old) are now showering praises on Billary Clinton.

Why Hillary Clinton Isn't Too Old for 2016

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/05/16/why-hillary-clinton-isnt-too-old-for-2016/

You are flawed.

i don't give a shit about the gun rights in the bill of rights. 1 =/= all. the constitution is flawed, it's not some holy grail. remember the one that allowed slavery?

The GOP is in very bad state right now. With the demographic decline of the Non-Hispanic White population, their support also seems to be waning away. They are unable to get any considerable support from the minorities (especially the Asians and the Hispanics). Even among the non-Hispanic Whites, the youth seems to be deserting them.

Gun rights are part of the Bill of Rights, so are we to believe that you do not give a shit about the Bill of Rights?

uh, i don't give a shit about gun rights.. what i do care about is how she is with her foreign policy. she just wants to continue on with the status quo with the military industrial complex. i'm guessing she'd be better than obama is with the politics though.

Is that really important who will be next US president? It is not like they will change something, it is all decided for us by people-who-have-the-power-and-money. Current leaders/presidents are just a puppets for them. It is just whole system that is corrupt.

Did she die?

It may well be Hillary for the next eight years because no one seems to be able to get their shit together.

I wish that it will be Hillary vs Rand Paul. Looks pretty difficult now, even though Paul is leading the opinion polls for Republican primary. So in the end, it will be Hillary vs Bush.

Well, as long as you are prepared to be able to survive in the aftermath of the inevitable collapse, I suppose so.

Lol, I am reminded of a quote went something like "attractive people go to Hollywood, ugly people go into politics." And I absolutely agree, if people only voted based on looks that would be horrible. Unfortunately that IS how a lot of stupid people vote - "he looks handsome, he must be trustworthy and good for the country!"

Vote green party. Fuck the two party system, not just in the US, but in Australia and the UK as well...It's the illusion of choice when you're actually picking between two turds that will bow to their corporate overlords.

Guess the next election will be another clinton against another bush. Pest vs colera

What you wrote!

+100

People wear those prism glasses for a number of reasons, not just head trauma.  They also wear them when the nerves controlling eye movement get messed up during plastic surgery.

Look at her leaving the hospital in this article.  It's the "Edward S. Hartness Eye Institute".  That facility does plastic surgery and eye work, not cranial blood clot surgeries.  She's wearing those Jackie O. style sunglasses women always wear after plastic surgery.  Her face is puffy and swollen.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/clinton-leaving-hospital-concussion-treatment-article-1.1231669



Hillary is so psychotic that brain damage would be an improvement.  She is uniquely qualified to supervise the collapse of the American Empire.

Vote Hillary!

Then why did she wore those lined glasses?

Ophthalmologist: Lined glasses Hillary wore used to treat double vision common to cases of severe head trauma

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2631090/Ophthalmologist-Lined-glasses-Hillary-wore-used-treat-double-vision-common-cases-severe-head-trauma.html

Glenn Beck is a Mainstream Media Shill like the rest.

In that article his operation is promoting the lie that Hillary went to the hospital because she bumped her head.

The truth is that she went in for plastic surgery to prepare for the next POTUS sportsball show.

The American Republic ended a long time ago.

Today we are merely running the grift out to its predictable, inevitable conclusion.

A VOTE FOR HILLARY will speed the process, and that is good for all decent people.

This is really interesting. Is a brain-damaged person allowed to contest in the POTUS elections? It is almost confirmed that Hillary Clinton is suffering from double-vision.

Karl Rove: Hillary Clinton Might Have Brain Damage

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/05/13/karl-rove-hillary-clinton-might-have-brain-damage/

Young Hillary Clinton Supporters Struggle to Name Her Achievements

http://youtu.be/Aw8WIia47WE

 

It's not about that. In two years many things can change both in politics and cryptos.
Just like in politics , a new candidate might emerge or the old one might have some serious health problems making him withdraw.

Well we nearly got Palin  .


Rand wont ever win, but I don't think he understand Bitcoin properly though, or has some weird ideas of what he wishes/wants it to be: http://www.nationalreview.com/agenda/377015/surprise-rand-paul-would-have-ruined-bitcoin-trying-make-it-hard-currency-patrick

Rand Paul is pro-Bitcoin. Can you imagine the kind of boost which the digital currency might receive if he becomes the POTUS? I will assure you that it will be even beyond the wildest of your dreams. 

Yep and the election of Hillary will portend the end of the Republic.

2016......2016
It's two years from now on.
I'm more concerned about bitcoin survival than her making it through.
 

Right now, she is leading all the potential GOP candidates, by a very large margin.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_christie_vs_clinton-3766.html

Christie vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9)
Huckabee vs. Clinton (Hillary: +12.4)
Paul vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.4)
Bush vs. Clinton (Hillary: +10.
Ryan vs. Clinton (Hillary: +9.3)
Cruz vs. Clinton (Hillary: +14.0)

So, it is almost certain. 

Well, the collar is indeed not quite right but I think most get my point!

Trust me. Billary will be even worse than chairman Mao. The chairman caused some 60 million or so deaths, Billary will score many times that number. She will be most war-crazy president that the US will ever have in its existence.

I don't know about that. It is pretty fitting outfit for me. Standing collar is so Mao'ish? I am sure PR specialist put everything in that photo, it is fully politically correct, haha.

mkay, i'll vote her, too bad~

And a better outfit for sure!

That one looks like those quilted things Chairman Mao was so fond of!

good luck with that, but she gonna need more then pretty banners to win

I'm voting for Hillary.

She is uniquely qualified to run the Empire.

I've grown weary of this slow-motion collapse. 

Vote with me.  Let's get this done.

I would vote for Hilary because she is environmentally correct and wears nylon or wool pantsuits. Given the surface area between her thunder thighs, and calculating the static electricity she generates just by walking around, she alone could provide enough electricity for a city the size of East St. Louis.

Ok Never mind Chelsea looks more like Mr Grinch.

100% correct. Whenever I think of Hillary, I remember this equation. 

+ ==>

Its funny that you said this cause my freinds boyfriend is coo coo and I really dont know a guy with OCD or ACD get a gun so easily.  HE would flip out if anyone challenges him.

I think shes starting to like Mr Grinch the one who stole cristmas

Also let's face it, if handguns weren't used in homicides, the numbers would drop dramatically. Rifles and shit are really small numbers, and as far as I know, there aren't many restrictions on long guns in Canada. I'm not sure what the solution is. It certainly isn't significant legislation, because the second amendment will hold up mostly. There needs to be reasonable discussion by people who know about guns, not the dipstick politicians who try for ridiculous changes based on emotion or looks.

There should be a way to deal with it, but it certainly won't be dealt with by pro gun nuts, or anti gun nuts. Those people only want to keep to their own agenda.

I don't see background checks  as much of an issue. The only thing that bothers me is registration of the real issue is hand guns and carrying them. When I look at the difference is lost between the US, and say Canada, the biggest difference seems to be carrying concealed or open carry handguns. 

I'll say that people don't always vote based on looks, and actually , thank god they don't.
Image the whole world run by pornstars .

Hillary is too ugly to be a president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers too

Bears? Anyone seen any bear in this thread? =)))))
But honestly , wasn't this thread open to discuss her "plans" not her looks and smells?

Actually, I don’t think that election and win of the person depends on his/her views on gun rights. Obama for long time wants to stop selling of guns to civils. I think he is in some case right. This law will create difficulties for terrorist and crazy ones. 

I actually approve of this kind of thing, I think they should also have mandatory firearms training because half time you hear about these 'horrible' accidents with guns or people killing them it's always some moron who has left the gun lying around and loaded or they've let somebody handle a firearm that doesn't know how to use them. The swiss have mandatory armed service and everybody keeps a rifle, you don't hear constantly about people like them getting shot because they've had the proper training, while I don't approve of the mandatory service, I think they should definitely have training before they're allowed anywhere near a gun.

I think the most a background check should involve is whether the person has a criminal record or a mental problem, because again, number one reason behind the killings is they clearly had something wrong with them or were involved in crime before.

The background check for gun ownership intrigues me; here's how it would work without political involvement:

1. Individuals refuse to purchase from gun sellers unless they subject themselves to a reasonable background check agency
2. Gun sellers refuse to subject themselves to a BCA which has unreasonable requirements for a sale
3. The BCA which provides the safest and least-restrictive guidelines earns money through each successful sale; the cost if the BCA is passed on to the individual through a hike in prices
4. Individuals who run illegitimate businesses risk social ostracism, with each infraction leading to a greater punishment; dispute resolution organizations handle these, who make money through collecting punishment fees
5. DROs which attempt to punish illegitimately are merely ignored; those which are best at their work get all the business.

However, there is a fatal flaw in this process: individuals can make their own guns, and they can now do so much more easily with the advent of 3D printing.  This means, whether you're doing background checks peacefully or through government, you cannot prevent the individual from having what he will own, as this necessitates regulation on who can own gun-creating blueprints/knowledge, materials, and printers or regulation on what can be printed on those printers, which would necessitate a steep decline in comfort and, principally, freedom.  So it really boils down to this, however you approach this problem:


The cost of upholding a background check on guns is made pointless as you cannot stop individuals from creating weaponry or stealing other's weaponry without Orwellian levels of monitoring; we are shown once more that, if someone really wants to do something and there are no victims, they will do so; it's only a massive inconvenience and waste of resources at best to impede a crime without victim.

OT, if Hilary doesn't understand this (proven by her sentiment for gun control), she's clearly not fit to rule me; besides, I have 22 years of governing myself, while she has none.  Until there exists a person with more experience in this than I, I would prefer to be unfettered.

Her menstrual blood will attract bears.

Did you hear that? Bears.

Well, I dint want to overly-offend the liberal/loonies which abound here.

You're right.

She is as ugly as a box of rocks.

It shouldn't be. Listen, if you want to start plastering "Hillary's too god-damn ugly" posters, I'll be the first donor.

It was a joke.

We're seriously going to discuss the US presidential election here? You lot take your vote more seriously than those voting by looks? You shouldn't, and I agree - Hillary's too ugly to be president. I don't want to see her face on the broadcast news and papers. Let's get one of the Palin daughters, or at least Janet Reno. Shit.

I've posted this a couple of times before, but I think I should do it again: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxHvHi-MdIM.

Here's a small quote from the episode:

Full autos, rocket launchers and bazookas were and are covered by the NFA Act.

This is not now, nor has there ever been a problem with NFA weapons.

I guess you don't realize there have been background checks on handguns for more than a decade. It just demonstrates her ignorance, and yours.

The government can take my RPGs when they pry them from my cold dead hands.

What a terrible infringement to have a back ground check when buying a handgun. I mean the world is clearly ending.

Well, she seems to say she supports the right to own firearms so everything depends on her actual nuances. For example, if a problem developed with actual assault weapons, at least my definition of assault weapons, then I would be for further restrictions on them. I'm not so sure it makes sense to keep some fully automatic weapons or SAM launchers, or bazookas in metropolitan areas. But I don't see it as worth dealing with until an actual problem develops.

Actually, this is why you shouldn't vote Hilary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I23fjRN-PGc

Everyone must undergo an instant background check for any firearms purchase. The fact you think there is a "loophole" for this shows just how utterly stupid you are.

http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/hillary-hates-gun-rights/This Facist can't be elected!!!!



Hillary Clinton has never really tried to disguise her disdain for the Second Amendment and the gun rights of Americans. In fact, she has consistently proven that she supports the same anti-gun agenda as President Obama.
Hillary supported and has called for a renewal of the failed “assault weapons” ban, she supports universal background checks and gun owner registration, and supports the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty, which would place our inherent right to keep and bear arms under the mercy of an international bureaucracy.
If she thinks she will ride a wave of support to the White House on the issue of gun control, she is sorely mistaken. Support for gun control is collapsing nationwide, and gun ownership is soaring among women, the key demographic that Hillary must capture to win the presidency.

Hillary Clinton recently appeared at the National Council for Behavioral Health conference and made some pretty bold statements against the natural right of gun ownership, saying gun laws in America are “out of balance” and need to be “reined in.” (H/T: Washington Times)

    “I think again we’re way out of balance. I think that we’ve got to rein in what has become an almost article of faith that anybody can have a gun anywhere, anytime,” Clinton said. “And I don’t believe that is in the best interest of the vast majority of people. And I think you can say that and still support the right of people to own guns.”
    Clinton told attendees at the mental health conference that “at the rate we’re going, we’re going to have so many people with guns everywhere, fully licensed, fully validated” in settings like movie theaters where shootings have arisen over seemingly mundane things like loud gum chewing or cellphone use.
    “That’s what happens in the countries I’ve visited where there is no rule of law and no self-control and that is something that we cannot just let go without paying attention,” she said.

Hillary Clinton somehow thinks that her approach to gun control is not an infringement and wouldn’t conflict with the people’s right to own guns.
That is just not the case though, and Hillary isn’t fooling very many people, at least not gun rights advocates. Her approach would lead eventually to most guns being banned, and the few guns left being registered and/or confiscated on a whim. She ignores (or maybe embraces?) the basic historical fact that a disarmed citizenry become slaves to tyrannical governments.
Hillary Clinton is a tyrant, and if she becomes President she will show just how tyrannical she really is. Her openly admitted support for gun control and the eventual disarming of the American citizenry is just one of several reasons why she must never become President.
The original intent of the Second Amendment is perfectly clear. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. All of her ideas about gun control are indeed an infringement of that sacred right. The Second Amendment was written specifically with tyrants like Hillary Clinton in mind, giving the people a way to protect themselves from an abusive government. We must never give up our guns, or we will have resigned ourselves and future generations to a life of oppressive tyranny with no way to fight back.