Topic: Those countries highly corrupted on higher level they Capitalistic dictatorship (Read 122 times)

The huge wealth gap we’re seeing might mean that the current economic and political systems just aren’t working for today’s world. When the rich keep getting richer and everyone else is left behind, it makes you wonder if the system is really benefiting everyone or just a few people at the top. In some cases, it can start to feel like a mix of capitalism and dictatorship, especially when there’s corruption involved.

So in sake of your topic ill based it on that and I think you have rightly pointed out the asymmetrical role of private wealth in political decisions. Indeed, in several countries like the United States, Russia, China, Brazil, and India, where private wealth may well surpass national wealth, there is every apprehension of corruption and legal capture. The fabrication and financing of political campaigns more often than not enable the rich to legislate upon and adopt policies that favor their interests at the possible cost of greater national interest.

These factors are often associated with poor scores in good governance and transparency indicators. In this respect, it would seem that such a minority group-which is wealthy-could undermine the democratic principle of giving equal voice and due consideration in decision-making processes regarding the economic and political concerns of the country.

Therefore, the threat of losing one's riches may motivate wealthy owners to become more protective of their wealth and, most of the time, associated with political parties that may protect their interests. This ability makes it possible to gauge the extent to which the various factors strengthen political power, and vice versa. Consequently, large inequalities of wealth within a nation may lead to intense corruption and wealthy influences in conflict with government policies.

The argument in this is that despite the different political and economic systems in the US compared with other BRICS countries, they do share a common environment in which wealth has a sufficient impact on policy decisions that undermine the democratic process and lead to socio-economic inequality; a severe deficiency occurs.



Indeed, it goes from top to bottom. Such high-volume cases really remind people to be cautious when undertaking business, hiring, or purchasing, since the risk of being scammed is highly liable. My own observation, supported by posts and similar articles, says corruption is not confined to one country. For example, though having watched a number of videos on corruption in India alone, I was able to note that Brazil has equal challenges of corruption and corrupt practices. This makes quite a strong point on multi-purpose and reassures that such should be avoided in any business or personal situation.

I recommend to read up more on commission schemes the international credit holds
i.e. https://www.foreignexchangelive.com/fx-guides/foreign-exchange-transfer-fees-margins/

I think its 0.2% on interstate credits, That means that the people orchestrating a 100 Billion Credit collect 0.2%. and all legal.
Now you know why governments are keen to give, or take credits.

Just a recommendation - when creating a new topic, it will be very useful to at least study the key indicators and basic information about what you want to voice. And without information - it looks like fantasy, and also not very qualitative, to put it mildly

As a result you have mixed (USA, Russia, China, Brazil and India) everything you can - a developed country of the western world, with a totalitarian old terrorist, with a country in the status of “factory of everything” that changed the course of development to totalitarianism, etc..... In a word - a lot of letters and words, but no sense and logic...

There is a saying in German which is fitting for all who have conspiracy on their mind.

Alles was ich selber tu trau ich auch dem andern zu. In Plain English: All I'm capable of, I believe that others do the same.
if you believe your government is corrupt you are corrupt too but you haven't had the chance to get your hands dirty.

I have no idea if the theory presented by OP has solid basis, but I can assure Brazil is indeed a highly corrupt country. It's a country where the government tries to get most money from you in every possible ways. In Brazil, you work almost half a year only to pay tributes. And that is not all, because besides paying abusive taxes in everything, you also receive constant news of scandals involving corruption schemes in every spheres of power (executive, legislative and judiciary). And those aren't isolated cases.

Corruption is present in every layers of society in large proportions, from bottom to top and vice-versa. For that reason, you must be very careful when hiring services, buying products and so on as the risk of being scammed is presented all the time. I used to watch some videos on the internet exposing scams in India, but recently I reached the conclusion in Brazil things aren't much different than that.

It is a common knowledge that in every government of a country there are a few high and mighty that controls or own resources and therefore also influence policies both economic and political as it affects the country. However, I am yet to see a country where a single individual is far richer than the entire country with it's resources pit together as you had hypothetically claimed in the op.

It would had made much meaning of you had backed up your claims with some data, especially with those countries you listed at the closing part of your op as places with high individuals have strong influence on their government.

Can you provide a valid source for this topic?

Sorry for saying this, no offense, If it is based on your own thoughts and personal arguments, it is fine, but I just wanted to know the process of how get this conclusion.

disproportionate influence on political decisions through lobbying or funding political campaigns.
Regulatory Capture: Industries may manipulate regulations to benefit wealthy stakeholders at the expense of broader societal interests.

Inequality in Access to Resources: Disparities in access to education, healthcare, and other essential services often arise when a small elite controls substantial resources.

Countries like those mentioned typically score poorly on indices measuring governance quality and transparency.

Conclusion

Based on these analyses, countries such as the United States, Russia, China, Brazil, and India exemplify scenarios where individual wealth may exceed national resources significantly. This situation could indicate potential corruption or undue influence over governmental processes.

The countries where some individuals have more wealth than what governments or banks possess include the United States, Russia, China, Brazil, and India, indicating possible corruption and strong influence over their respective governments.


Based on this USA is more likely the dictatorship country or brics kind of country but not the Western society kind of country but the country where few will have all.
If group of indviduals hold more wealth then country have then they could have huge impact over country political things what the rich indviduals want is the more profit and gains for them.

The GREED issues of those countries are because those countries had the situation when POOR people got rich and very wealthy, those poor people remember how HARD it was to be in poor situation so to not go back into poverty they will do all they can to have always extra money because they live in FEAR that their WEALTH Will be gone since they know that they cant even trust their own goverment they can trust only their own goverment If the political guys ARE friends of them or supported by them otherwise their business could be not favoured by the other political parties.


So the countries:
the United States, Russia, China, Brazil, and India, indicating possible corruption and strong influence over their respective governments.