Topic: Those that think Bitcoin will help developing Countries are in a fallacy - page 2. (Read 347 times)

The primary benefit developing countries may realize from Bitcoin adoption regards USD hegemony -- the dollar's use as a tool to extract resources and wealth from poor countries. If BTC were to become a global reserve currency -- supplanting the USD -- it could certainly improve the position of developing/exporting countries vis-a-vis the USA.

Take the World Bank, for example. It makes high-interest USD-denominated loans to poor governments. That USD is necessarily used to buy US exports, fueling US growth while saddling developing countries with usurious debt. Bitcoin as a global reserve could help alleviate the current debt bondage relationship between rich and poor countries.

There's also US sanctions to consider.


I think the point of Bitcoin was to channel rational greed into sound money. Why do you assume this greed is fundamentally bad? What net negatives will Bitcoin bring to society, in your view?

     I think it helps the developing countries through the economic growth changes. Bitcoin contributed already changes in many developing country that's why most of this countries makes bitcoin legal because they know what bitcoin can do, not only to the people's lives but also the development of a country in different aspect.

Blockchain technology helps developing countries to develop their economies! The BTC is also playing some role!
For example, in Venezuela, their legal currency has collapsed and they conduct daily transactions through BTC. There are also many BTC mines in Venezuela!

Pros and cons are everywhere and in every system but that doesn't make a particular system look bad. Apart from all other technical nitty gritties like connected networks or distributed public ledger etc., I can proudly say that bitcoin has given me financial freedom. Is it anything less where the governments have failed to provide us jobs and security??

Bitcoin is certainly not a magic wand which will develop a county drastically overnight. Every revolution takes time to take shape and it has already started. It is not a fallacy but a reality.

Ponzi business was in existance since the fiat. Does it make fiat look bad? The issue is with the negative minds that plays negative role in any ecosystem.

more interconnected or rulled by a corrupt internet propaganda system?

whats with the other 60.000 cryptocurrencies why arent they listed as well?

they didnt payed as good as ripple didnt they?

or the ponzi schemers around bitcoin litecoin etc.

Blockchain technology and so bitcoin will cause the world to be more interconnected, free financially. It will lead to increase in equality of opportunity so for third world countries it is good.

I'm not sure, how it helps the developing countries. For me bitcoin will grow high when it is adopted by developing countries. From experts research I believe it has got the potential to make the countries facing economic difficulties can get rid of it through bitcoin adoption or usage in the right manner.

in societies where there is a shortage of employees maintaining powerplants, bitcoin drives prices, and moves away electricity away from the poor.



then be honest about what bitcoin is, its just an annyoing propaganda coin.
shall we now have an internet overgarbaged with propagandacoins, searching for money earning cattle?
one thing will be for sure.

milliond and billions of people will be reteached towards a completely different lession, in a world with 60.000 or millions of propagandacoins created to look for money earning cattle

->working for money isnt worth it. we had such a world in the past. btw.

money then becomes just a worthless and useless toy. some old men think is valuable.


its not a fair monetary system, its a pyramid system around a miner cartel that pushes it. what about the other bitcoins btw. why not them?
solving problems in third world is much easier than with bitcoin, you create a coin, and pay jobless people with it that have drilled a well.

regards


we will have a new fractioning, the banksters and their neofeudalism are main cause for bitcoin being popular in the first place.


no its not freely available, it is being sold for national currencies, for gods and services. and so are 50.000 altcoins.



ohm jes and they will create even worse pyramid systems we had in the world before.

jes it is this way, establishment of a cryptocurrency is not for free its a huge swamp of corruption that has to be passed, that image will follow you.


jes freedom for the rich. for those creating the ponzischemes.

but i am afraid the world was always this way will never change.

cryptocurrencies have even less humanist goals, for example bitcoin straight forward just wastes ressources, that could have been used for the development of social structures.

but central banking is a bad alternative.

regards

The bitcoin certainly can not be used as a solution to develop a poor country, in addition to expensive equipment and electricity, bitcoin also still have a big risk in terms of price.

Bitcoin right now is not in a position to help a whole country or nation, it can help some individuals who can use it as a tool to achieve better financial freedom but until bitcoin operates in the way that was set out by Satoshi in his vision then it will not help those in developing countries, similarly though it won't help developed countries as a whole, just individuals within the country. The vision of bitcoin is one on a macroeconomic level not a microeconomic level which is where it is currently functioning.

I myself wouldn't think that way. Bitcoin never the economy of a certain country. Bitcoin is decentralized in nature, how can it help develop a country? It is indeed a fallacy and some are claiming that bitcoin is helping in the growth and development of a certain country which is not. Maybe some organizations involved in bitcoin making donations to certain countries that made people think that it helped them.

Hm....

Gotta say, I think the idea here is a little to emotionally arguing to be logical.

I'll go over your points.

Firstly, regarding bitcoin mining taking up valuable power around the globe.
Electricity can be thought of as money, here. It could be invested in a light bulb, a washing machine, or an asic miner. And if it makes the most sense (likely from a financial standpoint) to run a miner, instead of those other things, then it will likely happen.
Also, most miners are run in major farms in areas with dirt cheap electric. Not running off the only outlet in some poor village.

I fail to see that this is a problem.

Your second point. You say that bitcoin mining is raising the cost of electricity.

I disagree with that. If power companies are selling more power, generally they can afford to do so at a cheaper rate. That's why people buy things wholesale for cheaper than an individual unit.
If you have any proof that bitcoin is raising the cost of electricity for other people, I'd love to see it shared.

Thirdly. You are talking about people wanting to increase their wealth, like it is a bad thing. The lambo jokes are just that. --Jokes.

But even if they aren't, was bitcoin supposed to make humans all philanthropists?
Were we all going to join hands and give prayers of thanksgiving, because bitcoin made everyone a millionaire?
Seriously?


Bitcoin has, and will help third world countries. Just by virtue of existing.
It gives access to a fair, and uncorruptible monetary system. How many third world countries have those?
It allows anyone in the world to send, and receive payment in a functional currency for services rendered. (I have to admit, I have no idea what the national currency in Nigeria is, but bitcoin transcends the local requirements, and gives us all a basis for interacting with each other.)


Those are two freedoms that no one in the world had, until bitcoin came along. And now it is freely available to all corners of the world. That is helping.

And that isn't all of the good that blockchain technology will do for developing countries. Smart contracts, stablecoins, truly anonymous currencies, and so much more are coming, and being adopted by these places.

If you think that this only exists to make the rich richer, it is my opinion you are being narrow minded.
The banks didn't need any help. They were doing just fine, subjugating the world.

But now. Now there is an alternative. Now there is a choice. Now there is freedom.

All the factors you have given that bitcoin can't help developing countries are wrong and can be disproved. Access to electricity cost is very low in developing countries than advance economies, with this, more miners can obtain profitability in mining. The only problem is the knowledge of bitcoin mining that is lacking in those countries.

We can’t see the impact of bitcoin in our economy when the government is holding it back. How can we see its full potential when we all know that most economists and financial experts is against with it. But for me it doesn’t mean it can’t help a developing country economically. It is a revolutionary cryptocurrency coin in the first place and it does need to win first it’s rightful place in our society before this discussion.

I think it is not only about Bitcoin but the whole blockchain technology which can make a great change in the working and development of the country. Bitcoin is just a successful example of what the power of crypto and blockcahin can do in the world.

Care to show us one single damn example of cryptos helping developing countries?
Not that bs of Zimbabweans buying BTC when the largest exchange is doing 10 BTC volume per month.

Real life examples of how cryptos are influencing a country's economy.
You have to realize that on the large scale, cryptos are a drop in the ocean.



I agree with this but not because of the same reasons.
From my point of view, it's pretty simple.

The average European has at the end of the month more money left to put in coins than the 3rd world citizen gets in a monthly wage. And slowly and slowly coins will just follow the fiat path, with rich countries owning more coins and poorer countries counting satoshis.
Sad but true, the poor will get poorer. After all this is a capitalist free market, not socialism.

You're wrong because Bitcoin has already helped and it is still helping developing countries to tap directly into a decentralized financial market especially the skilled citizens.
You seemed to be only concerned about Bitcoin mining, your point would have been more tenable with the title "Those that think mining Bitcoin in developing countries will help those countries are in fallacy" which is also open for debate.

Sometimes i read stuff in this forum, so ridiculous but completely wrong, what so many people think, because they simply have a very small portion of awareness how the world works and only do quick assumptions on few information

Thinking Bitcoin will help developing Countries is absolutely wrong, situation for developing countries might even get worse.

firstly: mining Bitcoin is happening mostly in developd countries and in developing countries where there are already electricity shortages the mining of bitcoin makes it even worse, leading to higher expenses for electricity which is needed there for educating children, or building schools.

secondly:
Bitcoin increases costs for electricity in the developed world which then makes prices higher for the industrial production of investment goods like machines for farming and many moore, which the people in the developing countries need to develop their country.

thirdly:
Bitcoin changes what the youth in the developed world is doing where bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are more likely to be created mined and earned towards not developing poor countries but now towards fullfilling the greed of those that are running the mining and crypto infrastructure.

Lambo memes are a very good example of that. it represents the greed the pump and dump schemes

and much more.

these crazy falacities come from a curse of life, which comes from the need to do decisions and asumptions based on very few information.

but you know what the biggest joke of all this is?

the people in the developing countries can't do anything about that, they have to accept that.

regards