Author

Topic: throttling issue with s9 farm (Read 1023 times)

full member
Activity: 236
Merit: 105
December 23, 2016, 04:17:49 PM
#14
Cuffs - you are a douche.

That is all.

Shocked
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
December 21, 2016, 04:03:56 PM
#13
So you have a centralized PC in your shed acting as a mining pool which is then tied to another major pool, effectively making your shed one large mining rig as it appears to the internet?
Or are you funneling all your network usage through a VPN somewhere else? A proxy setup and a VPN are not the same thing?

Since I'm the only one apparently being an over sensitive asshole, I also seem to be the only one any longer commenting to your thread, So maybe telling people to "Please learn to read new posts" Is not the best way to answer someone who may or may not have missed a new post, or misunderstood your information given?

But please continue to tell me I'm a troll, And than answer the damned question of how your miners are hooked up?
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
December 20, 2016, 04:29:26 PM
#12
I don't think you want to run that many miners on wifi connections. wifi is really not the solution for any sizable deployment.

You mentioned your restrictions with distance, so how about this:
1. Setup WIFI router A at your internet access point
2. Setup WIFI router B to be the common access point for all your miners in your mining area
3. Setup router B to be a hotspot or repeater of A
4. If distance between A and B is an issue, throw a few boosters / repeaters in between to cover your dead spots. They are cheap from BestBuy, etc.

This reduces the number of connections to your WIFI broadcasting signals and technically should allow your WIFI router to better prioritize its traffic.

It may be the wireless with that distance,
So either get a extender and more cord.

Or I've heard of setting up a PC to act as a pool for your miner's which is then tied to a pool.
Never tried it. But then you are effectively only pushing one signal to the house.

Other option may be a bigger wireless repeater.

But wired is the way to go! Likely to many packets of similar info for it to handle..


Please learn to read new posts

Please learn to not ask for help then treat those trying to help like an asshole?

As I HAD SAID the other option is a proxy setup, so you only have one outward pointing stratum proxy server.
Or find a wireless provider and get better bandwidth, OR find a hosting company and mail your shit out.

You're the only one who's being an over sensitive asshole that can't read. I even stated I used a vpn. You're not even being helpful, you're just being what is known as a troll.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
December 17, 2016, 05:51:46 PM
#11
I don't think you want to run that many miners on wifi connections. wifi is really not the solution for any sizable deployment.

You mentioned your restrictions with distance, so how about this:
1. Setup WIFI router A at your internet access point
2. Setup WIFI router B to be the common access point for all your miners in your mining area
3. Setup router B to be a hotspot or repeater of A
4. If distance between A and B is an issue, throw a few boosters / repeaters in between to cover your dead spots. They are cheap from BestBuy, etc.

This reduces the number of connections to your WIFI broadcasting signals and technically should allow your WIFI router to better prioritize its traffic.

It may be the wireless with that distance,
So either get a extender and more cord.

Or I've heard of setting up a PC to act as a pool for your miner's which is then tied to a pool.
Never tried it. But then you are effectively only pushing one signal to the house.

Other option may be a bigger wireless repeater.

But wired is the way to go! Likely to many packets of similar info for it to handle..


Please learn to read new posts

Please learn to not ask for help then treat those trying to help like an asshole?

As I HAD SAID the other option is a proxy setup, so you only have one outward pointing stratum proxy server.
Or find a wireless provider and get better bandwidth, OR find a hosting company and mail your shit out.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
December 16, 2016, 09:50:05 PM
#10
I don't think you want to run that many miners on wifi connections. wifi is really not the solution for any sizable deployment.

You mentioned your restrictions with distance, so how about this:
1. Setup WIFI router A at your internet access point
2. Setup WIFI router B to be the common access point for all your miners in your mining area
3. Setup router B to be a hotspot or repeater of A
4. If distance between A and B is an issue, throw a few boosters / repeaters in between to cover your dead spots. They are cheap from BestBuy, etc.

This reduces the number of connections to your WIFI broadcasting signals and technically should allow your WIFI router to better prioritize its traffic.

It may be the wireless with that distance,
So either get a extender and more cord.

Or I've heard of setting up a PC to act as a pool for your miner's which is then tied to a pool.
Never tried it. But then you are effectively only pushing one signal to the house.

Other option may be a bigger wireless repeater.

But wired is the way to go! Likely to many packets of similar info for it to handle..


Please learn to read new posts
sr. member
Activity: 441
Merit: 250
No zuo no die why you try, u zuo u die dont be shy
December 14, 2016, 03:22:54 AM
#9
I don't think you want to run that many miners on wifi connections. wifi is really not the solution for any sizable deployment.

You mentioned your restrictions with distance, so how about this:
1. Setup WIFI router A at your internet access point
2. Setup WIFI router B to be the common access point for all your miners in your mining area
3. Setup router B to be a hotspot or repeater of A
4. If distance between A and B is an issue, throw a few boosters / repeaters in between to cover your dead spots. They are cheap from BestBuy, etc.

This reduces the number of connections to your WIFI broadcasting signals and technically should allow your WIFI router to better prioritize its traffic.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
December 13, 2016, 09:51:28 AM
#8
It may be the wireless with that distance,
So either get a extender and more cord.

Or I've heard of setting up a PC to act as a pool for your miner's which is then tied to a pool.
Never tried it. But then you are effectively only pushing one signal to the house.

Other option may be a bigger wireless repeater.

But wired is the way to go! Likely to many packets of similar info for it to handle..
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
December 06, 2016, 05:14:16 PM
#7
Well I managed to get 200ft to the shed with 5e. Connected to the switch and still same issue. I messed with this for 3 days straight. I kept messing with firewall settings all day and even made sure that the modem firewall wasn't protecting anything. Turned my asus repeater back into a router and that still didn't help. I used both my ethernet port of the modem and ddwrt router.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Visualize whirledps
December 01, 2016, 08:14:19 PM
#6
Using wireless "may" not be your problem, but I would definitely use wired Ethernet if it was available. Too many variables trying to mine over a wireless connection.
Just my .02.
Best of luck in solving your problem! Smiley

EDIT: Just as a test, if you are able, hook all your machines via wire and see what happens.


I will have to get a 500ft cord to my shed.

Oh, I understand. That is a dilemma. Sorry I can't provide any advice. Since I think the max length of cat 5 is 100 meters and cat6 is about 60 meters.

Best of luck!!
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
December 01, 2016, 08:08:52 PM
#5
Using wireless "may" not be your problem, but I would definitely use wired Ethernet if it was available. Too many variables trying to mine over a wireless connection.
Just my .02.
Best of luck in solving your problem! Smiley

EDIT: Just as a test, if you are able, hook all your machines via wire and see what happens.


I will have to get a 500ft cord to my shed.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Visualize whirledps
December 01, 2016, 07:30:47 PM
#4
Using wireless "may" not be your problem, but I would definitely use wired Ethernet if it was available. Too many variables trying to mine over a wireless connection.
Just my .02.
Best of luck in solving your problem! Smiley

EDIT: Just as a test, if you are able, hook all your machines via wire and see what happens.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
December 01, 2016, 07:04:34 PM
#3
You mention wireless network and a wifi router. You arent trying to run these on wifi are you?

Yes I have an asus RT-n12 as a repeater connected my main asus ac3100 router. The asus RT-n12 is using 9dbi antennas instead of stock.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 560
December 01, 2016, 01:55:11 PM
#2
You mention wireless network and a wifi router. You arent trying to run these on wifi are you?
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
November 30, 2016, 04:56:38 PM
#1
So I was running 5 s9s for a while with no issue till I decided to get 5 more. When they first were shipped and setup 4 out 5 of the new ones started having low hash rate issues almost as if one or two hashboards wouldn't work but all the boards are lit up. After months of constant diagnostics I've noticed that the super low hash rate issues kept on moving from one miner to another and after discovering the issue i'm being throttled. If I have more than 6 miners hooked up then the remaining after 6 miners will have very very low hash rates most would have only one board working even though all boards light up. Since I am with at&t uverse and discovered that there was reported bitcoin mining issues with them in the past I decided to install ddwrt on my asus ac3100 which did nothing. After that (what I thought to be an obvious fix) I added an openvpn to the router and that didn't fix it. I'm so far all out of options here. I can't use the latest firmware because anything from about 2 months to now I will get connection refused on every miner I install the new firmware with. I am using an asus RT-n12 for my wireless network. I did try using two different connections and still same issue.

Jump to: