Author

Topic: Tits are more offensive than guns (Read 1735 times)

legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
September 17, 2014, 03:32:11 AM
#25
Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy
Wilkon won this debate by bringing out the Big Guns right from the start ^_^
And ah missed these threads Tongue
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 504
September 16, 2014, 10:16:56 AM
#24
Looking at boobs regularly is apparently good for lowering your blood pressure.  You can google this its all over the internet.

http://www.menshealth.com/health/health-tip-look-at-breasts

Seems logically though i wonder if straight women or gay men have lower blood pressure under same circumstances or its purely a sexual attraction thing. 

Just make sure you're not looking at boobs in the wrong time or place!
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
September 16, 2014, 05:52:49 AM
#23
Looking at boobs regularly is apparently good for lowering your blood pressure.  You can google this its all over the internet.

http://www.menshealth.com/health/health-tip-look-at-breasts

Seems logically though i wonder if straight women or gay men have lower blood pressure under same circumstances or its purely a sexual attraction thing. 
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 16, 2014, 04:43:18 AM
#21








Hilary Swank reminds me of a horse I had growing up on the farm.   Undecided
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
September 16, 2014, 02:00:31 AM
#20
Exposed tits, exposed guns, cover them up and I'm offended.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 504
September 15, 2014, 12:56:55 PM
#19
Because people are fucking stupid that's why, I can't be polite about it anymore, people who get offended over inanimate objects and by something they see on a screen just annoy the fuck out of me.

Thank you for elaborating on my rant

We know that women can't go out on the streets shirtless like men can, yet, supposed "constitutionalists" would fight for your right to open-carry. Additionally, in movies, if a guy gets shot, and you can see his body hit the floor, blood flowing, a murder on screen in other words, the movie would get a PG-13 or a Mature rating at most. However, if there is a scene involving naked women, or passionate kissing, intimacy or romance that portrays the human body, it's an instant 'R' rating and the movie can't be broadcasted on television.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a believer of the second amendment, but why is it that one right matters so much more than the other? Why is murder okay, where breasts aren't?


Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy


HAHAHAHA INDEED

how do guns even offend people.. wait how do tits offend people  Huh
How? You mean why, I think. Tits are offensive so they stay in demand. Conditioning to keep birth rate up, I'd guess. If not taboo (prohibiting exhibitionism by law is a "pro-taboo pressure," though I'll admit it wouldn't necessarily make it taboo), much less excitement in it (where excitement/adrenaline leads to more [and better!] sex), though maybe people would just be more extreme in depravity to compensate. Most high-GDP Western nations are in dire need of baby-making and are happy to provide family allowances and similar pro-birth policies so they can continue with "$nationalracemajority first" politics and maintain regime with less criticism, since they won't be "distracted" as much by shrinking GDP and collapsing pro-senior welfare programs, so I'd assume maintaining these seemingly-ridiculous policies could only be social engineering to keep people boning. ... IMHO.


Sexualizing women and objectifying their bodies is sick.


There are still rules/laws/policies in place by old, rich, out of touch, geezers that are SEVERELY outdated.

The good news is, with each generation that passes, those geezers die. A new generation comes along and realizes that said rules/laws/policies are lame and retarded.

The fact that National Geographic still blurs out womens tits is ROFL absurd.
Anyone with a 5th graders brain knows that there is simply no point for them to do that...

Conservatives are still ruining the progression of this country.
Its up to the younger generations to review a lot of their "old fashioned" rules and change them for the greater good of society.



You're absolutely on point, SLVR4ME

It's just like that line from Dylan's "The times they are a changin"

"Come mothers and fathers, throughout the land,
Don't criticize what you can't understand,
Your sons and your daughters, are beyond your command,
Your old road is rapidly agin',
Please get out of the new one if you can't lend a hand!
The times, they are a changin' "
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
September 15, 2014, 12:41:34 PM
#18
Because people are fucking stupid that's why, I can't be polite about it anymore, people who get offended over inanimate objects and by something they see on a screen just annoy the fuck out of me.

Thank you for elaborating on my rant

We know that women can't go out on the streets shirtless like men can, yet, supposed "constitutionalists" would fight for your right to open-carry. Additionally, in movies, if a guy gets shot, and you can see his body hit the floor, blood flowing, a murder on screen in other words, the movie would get a PG-13 or a Mature rating at most. However, if there is a scene involving naked women, or passionate kissing, intimacy or romance that portrays the human body, it's an instant 'R' rating and the movie can't be broadcasted on television.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a believer of the second amendment, but why is it that one right matters so much more than the other? Why is murder okay, where breasts aren't?


Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy


HAHAHAHA INDEED

how do guns even offend people.. wait how do tits offend people  Huh
How? You mean why, I think. Tits are offensive so they stay in demand. Conditioning to keep birth rate up, I'd guess. If not taboo (prohibiting exhibitionism by law is a "pro-taboo pressure," though I'll admit it wouldn't necessarily make it taboo), much less excitement in it (where excitement/adrenaline leads to more [and better!] sex), though maybe people would just be more extreme in depravity to compensate. Most high-GDP Western nations are in dire need of baby-making and are happy to provide family allowances and similar pro-birth policies so they can continue with "$nationalracemajority first" politics and maintain regime with less criticism, since they won't be "distracted" as much by shrinking GDP and collapsing pro-senior welfare programs, so I'd assume maintaining these seemingly-ridiculous policies could only be social engineering to keep people boning. ... IMHO.


Sexualizing women and objectifying their bodies is sick.


There are still rules/laws/policies in place by old, rich, out of touch, geezers that are SEVERELY outdated.

The good news is, with each generation that passes, those geezers die. A new generation comes along and realizes that said rules/laws/policies are lame and retarded.

The fact that National Geographic still blurs out womens tits is ROFL absurd.
Anyone with a 5th graders brain knows that there is simply no point for them to do that...

Conservatives are still ruining the progression of this country.
Its up to the younger generations to review a lot of their "old fashioned" rules and change them for the greater good of society.

hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 504
September 15, 2014, 09:20:54 AM
#17
Because people are fucking stupid that's why, I can't be polite about it anymore, people who get offended over inanimate objects and by something they see on a screen just annoy the fuck out of me.

Thank you for elaborating on my rant

We know that women can't go out on the streets shirtless like men can, yet, supposed "constitutionalists" would fight for your right to open-carry. Additionally, in movies, if a guy gets shot, and you can see his body hit the floor, blood flowing, a murder on screen in other words, the movie would get a PG-13 or a Mature rating at most. However, if there is a scene involving naked women, or passionate kissing, intimacy or romance that portrays the human body, it's an instant 'R' rating and the movie can't be broadcasted on television.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a believer of the second amendment, but why is it that one right matters so much more than the other? Why is murder okay, where breasts aren't?


Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy


HAHAHAHA INDEED

how do guns even offend people.. wait how do tits offend people  Huh
How? You mean why, I think. Tits are offensive so they stay in demand. Conditioning to keep birth rate up, I'd guess. If not taboo (prohibiting exhibitionism by law is a "pro-taboo pressure," though I'll admit it wouldn't necessarily make it taboo), much less excitement in it (where excitement/adrenaline leads to more [and better!] sex), though maybe people would just be more extreme in depravity to compensate. Most high-GDP Western nations are in dire need of baby-making and are happy to provide family allowances and similar pro-birth policies so they can continue with "$nationalracemajority first" politics and maintain regime with less criticism, since they won't be "distracted" as much by shrinking GDP and collapsing pro-senior welfare programs, so I'd assume maintaining these seemingly-ridiculous policies could only be social engineering to keep people boning. ... IMHO.


Sexualizing women and objectifying their bodies is sick.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
September 15, 2014, 07:32:18 AM
#16

This is the most offensive image I have ever seen. Shame on you!
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
September 15, 2014, 07:31:35 AM
#15
Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy

<>

ASSAULT TITS!

I can't help it it's like that Jesus blowjob photo when I see it I just start laughing immediately! ;_; I'm so immature.
I would just hope that the jeasus BJ guy doesn't meet this chick

That's a worthy idea.  I wonder if there's some Moderator around here who would combine the two threads?

The possibilities are....
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
September 15, 2014, 07:10:13 AM
#14
TITS = Thugs In Trendy Style
DrG
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1035
September 15, 2014, 06:41:46 AM
#13








I like to see girls of that... caliber.

By "caliber," of course, I refer to both the size of their gun barrels and the high quality of their characters... Two meanings... caliber... it's a homonym... Forget it.

hero member
Activity: 675
Merit: 502
#SuperBowl50 #NFCchamps
September 15, 2014, 12:47:44 AM
#12
Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy

<>

ASSAULT TITS!

I can't help it it's like that Jesus blowjob photo when I see it I just start laughing immediately! ;_; I'm so immature.
I would just hope that the jeasus BJ guy doesn't meet this chick
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
September 14, 2014, 10:45:29 PM
#11
Maybe...but....how do you say this politely?

Better be praying if  you do missionary position....
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
September 14, 2014, 09:09:21 PM
#10
I know this is completely random but... Cheesy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnXRTr_eabQ
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
September 14, 2014, 09:03:24 PM
#9
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
September 14, 2014, 08:46:34 PM
#8
Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy


HAHAHAHA INDEED

how do guns even offend people.. wait how do tits offend people  Huh
How? You mean why, I think. Tits are offensive so they stay in demand. Conditioning to keep birth rate up, I'd guess. If not taboo (prohibiting exhibitionism by law is a "pro-taboo pressure," though I'll admit it wouldn't necessarily make it taboo), much less excitement in it (where excitement/adrenaline leads to more [and better!] sex), though maybe people would just be more extreme in depravity to compensate. Most high-GDP Western nations are in dire need of baby-making and are happy to provide family allowances and similar pro-birth policies so they can continue with "$nationalracemajority first" politics and maintain regime with less criticism, since they won't be "distracted" as much by shrinking GDP and collapsing pro-senior welfare programs, so I'd assume maintaining these seemingly-ridiculous policies could only be social engineering to keep people boning. ... IMHO.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
September 14, 2014, 08:35:38 PM
#7
Because people are fucking stupid that's why, I can't be polite about it anymore, people who get offended over inanimate objects and by something they see on a screen just annoy the fuck out of me.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Sound Engineer for Hire
September 14, 2014, 08:20:10 PM
#6
Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy


HAHAHAHA INDEED

how do guns even offend people.. wait how do tits offend people  Huh
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
September 14, 2014, 07:02:27 PM
#5
Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy

<>

ASSAULT TITS!

I can't help it it's like that Jesus blowjob photo when I see it I just start laughing immediately! ;_; I'm so immature.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
September 14, 2014, 06:32:27 PM
#4
Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy

<>

ASSAULT TITS!
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
September 14, 2014, 06:15:30 PM
#3
Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
September 14, 2014, 06:13:34 PM
#2






hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 504
September 14, 2014, 04:41:46 PM
#1
I'm tired of writing paragraphs of this rant, so I'll keep it short.

On television:

Gun violence (guy gets his head blown off with an AR-15) = PG-13
Tits                                                                               = Rated R
Jump to: