Topic: To save paper .... why doesn't LGBTQICBXBXVCU just call themsleves not straight? (Read 462 times)

of course I admit to hate them..So just say that instead of making an EXCUSE .. ..

I always say this..

Be free who you want to be as long as you hurt no one ..

I don't care who people sleep with as long as it's consenting ADULTS..
Because i don't feel nothing by someone sleeping with someone else ..UNLESS CHILDREN..

Children are children and should be treated as such ..BOY or GIRL..

We bring them up to be HAPPY most important thing of all ..
So they are happy and know they are LOVED..That's all that matters..

We don't live that long so why be angry over something that will never effect you..

Low percent are gay or want to be gay but SO WHAT IF THEY ARE..

BE FREE TO BE WHO YOU WANT TO BE AS LONG AS YOU HURT NO ONE..

Is it so hard for people to let people act in the way i mention?^^..

THEN if no why ..NOT HURTING ANYONE ..

Bestiality is not illegal (not legal as well) in some of the countries, and there are people who take advantage of that. Recently, the Balkans have become a stronghold of the pro-bestiality brigade. And regarding the legalization of pedophilia, there are certain groups in the Netherlands and some other western nations, which advocate legalization of that mental disease.

Note - if you search for lgbtqicbxbxvcu on Google, you'll find that this thread is the only place where that is mentioned.  You just made it up on the spot as a dramatic straw man.
Asexuality is a real thing.  As with all sexual identities, it shouldn't require tens of years for everyone in society to become individually acquainted to the term, because it's just a word that people use to describe their identity for as long as it suits them. 
So basically, you're comparing gay people and tolerance of two consenting parties doing what they want to paedophilia and bestiality.  Real classy.

Sometimes it means queer.  Depends who you ask.  But I've always considered it more useful when it means questioning.

antibiotic resistance is a problems with AIDS, as they require some really heavy duty ones for a long time.

I do think that these people should be accepted into society, though they shouldn't be rude to the people that are simply just trying to get informed and getting used to their new group / gender and everything that goes with it. I don't feel as if we should be making more and more groups to class this people into, it just doesn't make sense in the least. People aren't going to remember all these new bullshit names and it isn't going to help them either.

If you're going to be making more and more useless names, you're an attention seeker plain and simple.

But I do understand that some groups are needed, not every letter in the alphabet though.

True. "Not straight" would probably offend the "asexuals".


At first I thought Q meant "queer" too. Turns out it meant "questioning". I suppose "gay" is already "queer" anyway. As for BIs, they seem to get the short stick despite being listed in there. Heard "BI shaming" is a thing in pride parades.

@Sithara I believe "furries" are already a thing (both gay and straight). I don't think those have sex with animals though.  As for bestiality and pedophilia, those would probably not become legal in most countries. Children and animals can't give consent. Though I suppose people would just move where they are free to fuck little girls and goats...

 My tips are free, so far anyone who has followed my tips is in profit, so my tips are not shit. If you don't like them don't follow them.
I see strong support from your side to LGBT, of course I admit to hate them, they are disgusting to say the least.

I don't support the extermination of anyone based on sexual preference. But for sure I don't want my kids to grow up in a place full of sodomites. It will be better for them to have their own country. They can live without any discrimination and we can prevent our tax money being used for the treatment of their illnesses such as HIV and syphilis.

BLAME THE STARVING AFRICANS  ..

The majority of HIV researchers agree that HIV evolved at some point from the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), and that SIV or HIV (post mutation) was transferred from non-human primates to humans in the recent past..

There are six additional known HIV-2 groups, each having been found in just one person. They all seem to derive from independent transmissions from sooty mangabeys to humans. Groups C and D have been found in two people from Liberia, groups E and F have been discovered in two people from Sierra Leone, and groups G and H have been detected in two people from the Ivory Coast. These HIV-2 strains are probably dead-end infections, and each of them is most closely related to SIVsmm strains from sooty mangabeys living in the same country where the human infection was found.[3][12][19]

Molecular dating studies suggest that both the epidemic groups (A and B) started to spread among humans between 1905 and 1961 (with the central estimates varying between 1932 and 1945...




United States with AIDS. Deaths: An estimated 13,712 people with an AIDS diagnosis died in 2012..

9 Jun 2017 - This fact sheet provides data about HIV in the United States. ... HIV Surveillance Report 2016;27. ... In 2014, there were 12,333 deaths (due to any cause) of people with diagnosed HIV infection ever classified as AIDS..


But in the United States alone, 36,000 people die and more than 200,000 are hospitalized each year because of the flu.

MYTH: You can't spread the flu if you're feeling well. Actually, 20% to 30% of people carrying the influenza virus have no symptoms..


So if your worried about dying i would worry more about the FLU .. ..

And on a last note..

YOUR TIPS ARE SHIT ..Couldn't pick your nose ..

SHIT TIPS    Like your shit piss poor post ..

Just admit you hate LGBTQRSPXLKJCHWDOIHEDIHDUIOCHPDUICHIDUH      GROUP ...
Because of aids ..YOU JUST HATE THEM ..

What crazy people pay you to give them a SHITTY TIP ..

I propose they just shut the fuck up.

Wow. Since when did they add the Q? And what does it mean? Queer? Freakin irrelevant in my opinion. I'm fine with the LG until LGBT, but they should honestly just stop there. They're now just being hipsters by adding other genders. Also, why isn't apache helicopters not in the genders list yet?

Lol. I propose to eradicate them from earth. No I am not an extremist or racist against people with strange taste but they are responsible for the illness of century or AIDS. I don't want to go more into detail as it will make people reading this vomit but they are the responsible for many deaths from sexual transmitted diseases.

Ok so you say I have gone to an extreme case, then let's move them all in a prison like country, let's create one and to leave all these f up persons there. No one have the right to go out from it. They don't deserve more than this.

First it was just LG, then it became LGB, and later LGBT. Now it has become LGBTQ. In the future, they will include pedophiles and people who indulge in bestiality. The next will be persons with strange fetishes... I don't want to go in to the details.

I propose ignoring them.   Everything after the T is just attention seeking and rational people don't have time for that.    I don't have enough cookies to give out to every person who thinks theyre special.   

The longest I've seen in real use is LGBTIQ+ - meaning Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intergender and Questioning (not sure of their sexual or gender identity).

The plus is just to indicate that people supporting these groups should be supporting any other different groups and generally be supportive of people's identity regardless of what it is.

It's obvious that the reason for distinguishing between these groups is to recognise that they are all legitimate and relevant groups to exist.  To just say "not straight" is ignoring that all these people actually have different identities rather than just being "not straight".

What i can say is that they are very confused and there is something wrong upstairs, if that wasn't the case, they wouldn't be what they are now and they are forcing we the normal ones to accept them and their choices and this tell me that they haven't accepted what they are themselves.

every time you turn around there in another letter added, why not just use "not straight," I mean the amount of ink and re-printing as well as confusion this would save.


So I propose the term Not Straight.