Author

Topic: today's msn money article (Read 967 times)

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
April 05, 2015, 05:26:49 AM
#14
They still don't get what btc is backed by.......enjoy Grin

And you get it?
Then please tell me what it is.
Please don't tell me that it's network of miners - in 2009 there were only handful of them.

PS Correct answer is: "First tell me what backs dollar/euro/any other fiat currency?" :p


Bitcoin is backed by usage. When it is used, it is useful, it has value.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 504
(っ◔◡◔)っ🍪
April 04, 2015, 12:11:54 PM
#13
They still don't get what btc is backed by.......enjoy Grin

And you get it?
Then please tell me what it is.
Please don't tell me that it's network of miners - in 2009 there were only handful of them.

PS Correct answer is: "First tell me what backs dollar/euro/any other fiat currency?" :p
Q7
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
April 04, 2015, 03:50:00 AM
#12
While it sounds like a great idea, few questions lingers in mind. Who is going to control the amount of coin generated and to ensure that it will always have enough gold to back the crypto money in circulation? If that is the case, then there will be a need for central authority, so the question next is  what is going to happen to the decentralization part.

Quote
Van Cleef said the redeemable gold concept only works if investors can trust the provider to actually back up their promise

Even that was highlighted in the article itself. Well, let's just see how it goes.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
April 02, 2015, 05:13:44 PM
#11
...I think that these words are on point here: "How do you know the cryptocurrency's value is really there? What happens if something goes wrong? Can it be sold or redeemed?" "The value of these cryptocurrencies is only as good as what backs them." Mathematics is not enough.

Let me try this the other way around:

How do you know the gold's value is really there?

Yes, the gold is backed by gold, but its value is not guaranteed. Only small % of the value is due to demand for gold because of its unique properties (and this can change pretty quickly if new technology is developed). Rest of the value is created by belief that gold is 'valuable'.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
★Nitrogensports.eu★
April 02, 2015, 04:58:37 PM
#10
Quote
Anthem Vault plans to launch a gold-backed crypto-coin in May.
I want to see his stupid face when he finds out Bitcoin is backed by pure mathematics and does not need gold.
I think that not many people will agree with you here. After all for gold you can buy food and exchange it for literally everything else. And mathematics... well, it is pure abstraction for most people.
As you can see volatility of bitcoin and other altcoins backed purely by laws of mathematics. I think that these words are on point here: "How do you know the cryptocurrency's value is really there? What happens if something goes wrong? Can it be sold or redeemed?" "The value of these cryptocurrencies is only as good as what backs them." Mathematics is not enough.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
April 02, 2015, 04:19:07 PM
#9
this has been an obvious route to undoubtedly countless ppl. seems like someone that just can't accept the "lack of intrinsic value." in a century with 3d printed skyscrapers and quasi-immortality i'm not so sure that replication technology won't render gold to history book/industrial material status.
sr. member
Activity: 254
Merit: 1258
April 02, 2015, 03:30:08 PM
#8
I actually wrote about an article that is the wall street journal covering this coin to my economics professor in part of my project.

Pretty much the WSJ figured this solved everything by backing it by gold but showed they had zero information on how Cryptocurrency works.

1:It is a centralized source
2:Each coin is started at 1gram of gold
3:Their exchange is the only one that allows it to be traded for gold
4: If their exchange gets hacked and even no physical gold is stolen they can't just reissue coins or pay them back without doubling their physical supply of gold or invalidating other coins since they can be mixed
5: The coin can pretty much be destroyed by a DDOS and kills the exchange to gold.

There is no understanding of Crypto by the mainstream media yet and this is proof, I don't blame MSN but WSJ should know better.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073
April 02, 2015, 04:01:20 PM
#8
Yea another journalist on crack.  Roll Eyes

They want something physical to back Crypto currencies or they simply do not believe that it can exist.  Grin

How complicated can it be? {It's a electronic distributed online ledger} .....The irony is, the editor do not understand the technology too, and allow such dribble to be posted.

You have to laugh at this shite.  Grin Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
April 02, 2015, 03:18:15 PM
#7
*Yawn*

Quote
Anthem Vault plans to launch a gold-backed crypto-coin in May. The bet is that the coin—which is redeemable for 1 gram of gold at the market price—will be a big hit with investors who are tired of bitcoin's wild ways.

Only until the backing entity hits financial difficulties (doesn't generate enough profit, some exceptional losses, hacking, insufficient network etc), which statistically is very likely. And when that happens bitcoin will look like a poster-boy for stability compared to their new crypto.

Also, it's not really that revolutionary. You can already use bitreserve.org, transact with BTC for convenience whenever needed but keep your holdings in either BTC/USD/Gold/Silver+other metals, whichever you feel is best.
sr. member
Activity: 242
Merit: 250
April 02, 2015, 03:02:59 PM
#6
Quote
Anthem Vault plans to launch a gold-backed crypto-coin in May.
I want to see his stupid face when he finds out Bitcoin is backed by pure mathematics and does not need gold.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 296
Bitcoin isn't a bubble. It's the pin!
April 02, 2015, 01:52:16 PM
#5
looks like msn money was off by a day for their april fools joke  Grin
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
April 02, 2015, 01:16:56 PM
#4
what an absolute rubbish article. 'tired of bitcoin' people are tired of altcoins.
nowadays quite a few articles published lack quality. this article is one of them.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
April 02, 2015, 01:00:58 PM
#3
I cannot tell if this article is good or bad for crypto.

I'm going with bad, since they like to explain how there are thousands of shitcoins.   
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
April 02, 2015, 12:15:12 PM
#2
I cannot tell if this article is good or bad for crypto.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
April 02, 2015, 12:12:16 PM
#1
Jump to: