^ I don't really have a brother, but I thought it was funny.
If you want to go further than top 50, see here.
Topic: Top 50 merit senders list, all time (Read 232 times)
^ I don't really have a brother, but I thought it was funny.
If you want to go further than top 50, see here.
It is difficult to track colors. Can you add a link so that the user can access this data?
the list on the right of the image completely disappears from the table below. Below, the arrangement of the members is different from the arrangement of the members on the right of the image, and therefore it is for different data or it is inaccurate.
the list on the right of the image completely disappears from the table below. Below, the arrangement of the members is different from the arrangement of the members on the right of the image, and therefore it is for different data or it is inaccurate.
For those with color blindness, this is a nightmare to distinguish ngl
The information in this thread can be easily obtained in the merit stats page, but I I'll have been interested in seeing a chart which shows the entire too 50 users against the rest of the forum.
I'm sure the difference will be great despite the fact that 50 forms less than 1% of the entire forum.
I'm sure the difference will be great despite the fact that 50 forms less than 1% of the entire forum.
I am adding another detail.
That graph is unintelligible.
I'm adding yet another detail: That graph is unintelligible.
LOL
at your low-effort, very obvious merit grabbing attempt. You're a Jr. Member and you're presenting readily available data in a shitty pie chart? Get outta Meta!!!
This topic is unnecessary, sorry to say it.
For OP, he's looking at it from a different angle. He needs merits to rank up 
Although I appreciate the efforts but as said above also this information can easily be retrieved from other sources like BPIP but there is also some smerits difference with what you have mentioned in your charts for these generous merit sources.
I am adding another detail.
That graph is unintelligible.
Looking at this pie chart, even with perfect vision is difficult to visualise the correct label for each slice of the pie.
As probably 8% of the population has some kind of colour blindness (8% of the total male population, hence the 8% of the forum population), that graph becomes absolutely unintelligible to them.
The users will have to look on both sides to identify the merit stats along with this colour issue.Like in his chart he should have mentioned the user in the each piece with numbers outside instead of creating separate list with those mixed up colour stats.You represent monthly reports and make these charts regularly but yes members should be selective in colour combination while making these graphs to cater all the audience. That graph is unintelligible.
Looking at this pie chart, even with perfect vision is difficult to visualise the correct label for each slice of the pie.
As probably 8% of the population has some kind of colour blindness (8% of the total male population, hence the 8% of the forum population), that graph becomes absolutely unintelligible to them.
I am adding another detail.
That graph is unintelligible.
Looking at this pie chart, even with perfect vision is difficult to visualise the correct label for each slice of the pie.
As probably 8% of the population has some kind of colour blindness (8% of the total male population, hence the 8% of the forum population), that graph becomes absolutely unintelligible to them.
When publishing a graph you should think maybe 8% of your audience cannot separate those colours.
That graph is unintelligible.
Looking at this pie chart, even with perfect vision is difficult to visualise the correct label for each slice of the pie.
As probably 8% of the population has some kind of colour blindness (8% of the total male population, hence the 8% of the forum population), that graph becomes absolutely unintelligible to them.
When publishing a graph you should think maybe 8% of your audience cannot separate those colours.
I also think it's something similar to the thread already created by Ddmrddmr https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcointalk-merit-dashboard-4428616 which title says bitcointalk merit dashboard, the only difference i see here is that OP make his own research to extract data of all time 50 merits gangs which i see as another blow to he has created time to derive, anyway I will appreciate his efforts on this even though it's of less relevance.
Sources are from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats
This topic is unnecessary, sorry to say it.
This topic is unnecessary, sorry to say it.
