Forced Emission controls in a free country is a crime, you can remove these and pollute all you want. For best results get SUV, motorcycle, or other gas guzzler. I leave mine on overnight. Fuck tyrants.
We can fight the environment together. Fuck nature. I'll burn some old tires next to some trees.
But seriously, your rhetoric has limited scope, and begs an equivalency. If you would consider the imposition of carbon controls as a crime against your person, what about the greater crime that your unrestricted footprint causes against your fellow? If you would effect the environment in a way disagreeable to another, what about the crime against that person? Someone's free will is going to get stepped on in this, which one is more important?
Does the ability to exercise ones will only apply to yourself, or do you respect everyone's free will?
And from the greater societal viewpoint, which does the most harm to the human gestalt? Your will being preserved, or the 'others' that would deny you your right to waste energy?
