Why self moderated to delete what ever you don't like? this is now my suggestion mate, what if we nuke ourselves to see what happens?
I mean all the planet, lets make it inhabitable, I got curious to know what would happen if every country with nuke just launches their bombs
Do you think aliens will come to prevent total destruction of our planet or?
I mean all the planet, lets make it inhabitable, I got curious to know what would happen if every country with nuke just launches their bombs
Do you think aliens will come to prevent total destruction of our planet or?
The planet would become more habitable with lots more CO2 global warming.
The REAL SCIENCE behind carbon dioxide:
Plants use CO2 to create CBD, THC, curcumin
and all medicinal molecules
Quote from: http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-06-02-carbon-dioxide-real-science-co2-cbd-thc-curcumin-nutrients.html
The key accomplishment of the climate change cult (so far) has been to convince gullible environmentalists that carbon dioxide is a “pollutant” that’s somehow bad for the planet, even when CO2 is the “greening” molecule for all plant life.
Carbon dioxide is the essential molecule for all plant life, and without it, the entire web of life on our planet would instantly collapse. Yet misinformed environmentalists have been exhaustively convinced that carbon dioxide is somehow a “death” molecule for the planet, when exactly the opposite is true: The planet would die without it… and humans would have no vegetables, no fruits, no herbs and no cannabis at all if it wasn’t for carbon dioxide.
Climate change fanatics repeatedly cite “science” as their domain from which they might demand absolute compliance and obedience to their delusions. “Science,” they say, is why they never have to provide any real evidence that would support the bizarre notion that carbon dioxide is somehow bad for the planet. No debate is allowed, either, because they claim a monopoly over “science” by asserting all debates are “already settled.” Therefore, no further discussion may be tolerated. (This is the twisted, Left-wing version of science totalitarianism, courtesy of sociopathic, power hungry science overlords like Neil DeGrasse Tyson.)
Carbon dioxide is the essential molecule for all plant life, and without it, the entire web of life on our planet would instantly collapse. Yet misinformed environmentalists have been exhaustively convinced that carbon dioxide is somehow a “death” molecule for the planet, when exactly the opposite is true: The planet would die without it… and humans would have no vegetables, no fruits, no herbs and no cannabis at all if it wasn’t for carbon dioxide.
Climate change fanatics repeatedly cite “science” as their domain from which they might demand absolute compliance and obedience to their delusions. “Science,” they say, is why they never have to provide any real evidence that would support the bizarre notion that carbon dioxide is somehow bad for the planet. No debate is allowed, either, because they claim a monopoly over “science” by asserting all debates are “already settled.” Therefore, no further discussion may be tolerated. (This is the twisted, Left-wing version of science totalitarianism, courtesy of sociopathic, power hungry science overlords like Neil DeGrasse Tyson.)
Read more and click the links at http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-06-02-carbon-dioxide-real-science-co2-cbd-thc-curcumin-nutrients.html.
Yeah sure.
I mean obviously the whole scientific community has explained how and why CO2 is a danger to pretty much everything but they're all wrong. Seems obvious to me that they're all wrong and that CO2 is good for the planet.
Everyone know that.
Obvious shit.
