Author

Topic: Total Number of Bitcoin Addresses with at least 1 Satoshi (Read 1217 times)

hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500


Picture taken from:


As far as the '1 satoshi' part is concerned, counting that would be useless even if there was an effective way to do so. This is due to the fact that this is dust (actually even less than dust per this definition). Definition:
Quote
A transaction output is considered dust when the cost of spending it is close to its value.

thats some interesting statistics to be honest i have never seen something like that to be honest, its impressive to know that so much addresses are with just 0.001 amount of bticoins max

i think that there are not a lot of people that actually use addresses that have over 0.05 bitcoins because most wallets are used for just dust transactions and nothing else
legendary
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
97% of all the addresses have less than 0.002 BTC in them? Wow I must be filthy rich then, taking into consideration this website and if the fact is truly true that 97% of the addresses hold on them less than 0.002 BTC this fact is amazingly shocking.

it's not a good thing, the distribution in the bitcoin world is amazingly bad, but still better than the one out there, from fiat money

One address does not represent one person. For example if you have 10 BTC total you might have few address in the range 1-10 BTC, tens in the range 0.01-1 BTC and bit more under 0.01 BTC. This happens because of change address, or because you might use different addresses to track from where you received Bitcoins.

But if everyone just used one address (like was popular on blockchain info), it would be much easier to analyze, but then you loose privacy if you use just one address.

Still, so much 0-0.001 is surprising, I guess someone might sending right over dust amounts to many addresses to increase utxo (unspent transaction outputs) size of the database, thus stress testing Bitcoin.

unless it's an exchange that address rapresent at best a group of people, which still represent a very bad distribution

also you are talking about 1 person having many address in your example, which is another thing
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
The mind is everything. What you think you become.


Picture taken from:


As far as the '1 satoshi' part is concerned, counting that would be useless even if there was an effective way to do so. This is due to the fact that this is dust (actually even less than dust per this definition). Definition:
Quote
A transaction output is considered dust when the cost of spending it is close to its value.

so,percentage of bitcoin address up to 97% ?really? and then how many bitcoin address left?
i dont understand with that stats,any help will apreciated.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
(As an aside, the above metric is showing an interesting drop starting in March 2016 - no idea what is causing that)
My 2 satoshis: maybe it's linked to the fact that the price of bitcoin was stagnating at that moment.

Well the price is rising now - but the number of unique addresses used per day hasn't risen to what it was at the start of the year. perhaps people are just keeping their coins on exchanges and no longer moving them to their own wallets.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1012
★Nitrogensports.eu★
97% of all the addresses have less than 0.002 BTC in them? Wow I must be filthy rich then, taking into consideration this website and if the fact is truly true that 97% of the addresses hold on them less than 0.002 BTC this fact is amazingly shocking.

If bitcoins are spread across addresses (as they should be), then this doesn't give an idea of the total number of coins held by a person.
I for one have my coins in multiple addresses / wallets.
sr. member
Activity: 423
Merit: 250
97% of all the addresses have less than 0.002 BTC in them? Wow I must be filthy rich then, taking into consideration this website and if the fact is truly true that 97% of the addresses hold on them less than 0.002 BTC this fact is amazingly shocking.

it's not a good thing, the distribution in the bitcoin world is amazingly bad, but still better than the one out there, from fiat money

One address does not represent one person. For example if you have 10 BTC total you might have few address in the range 1-10 BTC, tens in the range 0.01-1 BTC and bit more under 0.01 BTC. This happens because of change address, or because you might use different addresses to track from where you received Bitcoins.

But if everyone just used one address (like was popular on blockchain info), it would be much easier to analyze, but then you loose privacy if you use just one address.

Still, so much 0-0.001 is surprising, I guess someone might sending right over dust amounts to many addresses to increase utxo (unspent transaction outputs) size of the database, thus stress testing Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
Quote
Total Number of Bitcoin Addresses with at least 1 Satoshi

If that will be the case then i think spending the amount will cost much more than the amount that is there in the wallet.
legendary
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
97% of all the addresses have less than 0.002 BTC in them? Wow I must be filthy rich then, taking into consideration this website and if the fact is truly true that 97% of the addresses hold on them less than 0.002 BTC this fact is amazingly shocking.

it's not a good thing, the distribution in the bitcoin world is amazingly bad, but still better than the one out there, from fiat money

if it is still that bad it also mean that those with high amount of coins are still sitting on the same amount of coins, this also lead us to think that they always buy back, which is good
copper member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 529
97% of all the addresses have less than 0.002 BTC in them? Wow I must be filthy rich then, taking into consideration this website and if the fact is truly true that 97% of the addresses hold on them less than 0.002 BTC this fact is amazingly shocking.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
That image however is difficult to understand,those 97% of addresses are from the total number of bitcoin addresses generated or the addresses in the same range IE 0.00-0.01 ?
Nothing difficult to understand. 97% of the total addresses generated have between 0 and 0.001 Bitcoins on them. Just take a closer look on the website.

That means I should be able to track any number of addresses containing a amount which I intend to search for ?
Depends on how you implement the search.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 721
(As an aside, the above metric is showing an interesting drop starting in March 2016 - no idea what is causing that)
My 2 satoshis: maybe it's linked to the fact that the price of bitcoin was stagnating at that moment.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
「きみはこれ&#

Picture taken from:


As far as the '1 satoshi' part is concerned, counting that would be useless even if there was an effective way to do so. This is due to the fact that this is dust (actually even less than dust per this definition). Definition:
Quote
A transaction output is considered dust when the cost of spending it is close to its value.


That image however is difficult to understand,those 97% of addresses are from the total number of bitcoin addresses generated or the addresses in the same range IE 0.00-0.01 ? That means I should be able to track any number of addresses containing a amount which I intend to search for ?
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
I don't think anyone is tracking total number of addresses with coins (or even total used addresses, some of which have no coins now).

Blockchain.info tracks number of unique addresses used per day:

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-unique-addresses

About 398,000 addresses are used per day

(As an aside, the above metric is showing an interesting drop starting in March 2016 - no idea what is causing that)
sr. member
Activity: 552
Merit: 250
Therefore, the total number of addresses with amount > 0 is 136,897,703. If on average each user has 136 addresses with balance, then we will have about 1 million users.

However, I guess most of the addressees with 0-0.001 BTC belongs to users who try bitcoin and then left. Therefore, we will end up with 3,489,495 address with more than 0.001, which assume belong to serious users. If each user has 10 addresses, we will have about 300k bitcoiners.


legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.


Picture taken from:


As far as the '1 satoshi' part is concerned, counting that would be useless even if there was an effective way to do so. This is due to the fact that this is dust (actually even less than dust per this definition). Definition:
Quote
A transaction output is considered dust when the cost of spending it is close to its value.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1183
anyone know what the total number is as of today?Huh is there a website tracking this?

I don't think there is a way to exactly know this, but on this website you can get some interesting info on addresses:

http://www.bitcoinrichlist.com/

It's not very accurate I think, but I cant find anything else.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
anyone know what the total number is as of today?Huh is there a website tracking this?
Jump to: