Alik Bakhshi
Trans-Caspian gas pipeline, or Third World War
The idea of a Great Germany led to the Second World War.
The idea of creating a "Great Armenia" …
Baku and Baku Oil is one of the main strategic directions of the Wehrmacht in World War II, in the event of the success of all military equipment of the Soviet Union immediately appealed to a useless scrap iron, and Germany gained much-needed source of fuel. It so happened that after 60 years in Baku in the eyes gradually tightened knot geopolitical issues far beyond regional, and able to quickly develop into a larger regional war, which has the potential to become the Third World.
At the heart of the emerging conflict is old expansionist policy in the Caucasus, Moscow, and easily predictable circumstances connected with the inevitable economic challenges that await in the case of Russia, the Caspian states mining project and delivery of hydrocarbons of the Caspian basin to Western Europe, bypassing Russia. Naturally Moscow will make every effort, until the military to maintain its monopoly in this vital area of the economy for it. It is true the first attempt in the 2008 war with Georgia had failed. Unable to occupy Georgia, although the armored columns were already on the outskirts of Tbilisi. The fact is that having captured Georgia, Moscow takes control of operating oil pipeline Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline and eliminates any possibility of hydrocarbon export Caspian countries bypassing Russia. In addition, eliminating an important strategic gap - the continuity of the axis Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran. It is possible that the military provocation of Russia in Georgia provoked strong Armenian lobby, because the isolated location of Armenia hinders not only military cooperation between the countries of the axis, but worsens the already tragic in terms of the state of the economy of Armenia.
The last episode of the eternal conflict between Russia and Turkey resulted in the late 19th century to the creation of a fixed boundary, namely, the territory of Yerevan khanate of Azerbaijan, the buffer zone by pushing the local Turkish population and its mass settlement of Armenians in Turkey and Iran.
To a lesser extent settling Armenians were in the Karabakh khanate. I must say, with the same success Russian might inhabit the area the Kurds, who, like the Armenians lived in the vast area of the region, and there obviously has played a major role religious affiliation. Robust colonization of the Caucasus, especially in light of the years of war with Shamil, Russia saw in the settlement of this territory by Christians, so there Kuban and Terek Cossacks in the North Caucasus and the Armenians in Azerbaijan.
Armenians, as traders and artisans, rather dispersed lived in the territory of Turkey, Iran and the Caucasus, creating a compact focal population in large cities. So at the time of the conquest of Georgia's Armenians constituted 60% of the population of Tbilisi. An interesting fact in Iravani, the future capital of an artificial Armenia, Armenians and Kurds lived by 5%. In fact, the right to claim the same territory of the Kurds under the "Great Kurdistan" is no less than that of the Armenians under the "Great Armenia". Perhaps that is why, when, during the First World War, the Armenians, with the support of Russian, raised a bloody revolt in Turkey, along with the destruction of the Turks and the Kurds were.
The Armenians were not directly linked to the land and may be the reason in the lack of this people of the state until the Russian. Maybe I'm wrong, but still let me make some comments on the relationship of the people, his mentality and the state. People feed the land on which they live, engaging in farming, but there are people, such as the Roma, which the land as such is of no value, the gypsies another way of being. Armenians are great craftsmen, traders, financiers, and it must be confessed, the organizers of mafia structures traditionally scattered throughout the towns and the bulk of the land is not directly related. Proof of this catastrophic state of agriculture in Armenia, or rather its absence, and this despite the fact that the capture of a large Azerbaijani territory is suitable for agriculture. Freed from colonial rule, people have free access to their land, and the first thing that has developed is agriculture, such as neighboring Armenia, Azerbaijan is not only self-sufficient, but also exports of agriculture products in Russia, and only Armenia is an exception in this respect. After the ethnic cleansing of Armenia does deprived farmers of Azerbaijani and somehow make ends meet due to the powerful Armenian diaspora. As a consequence, once populated by Armenians Russian Erivan khanate, emptying, the population leaves an artificially created country for a prosperous life, spreading to other nations in line with their mentality. Well, not as they are their own boots! In confirmation of what has been said is a known fact - all Azerbaijani refugees from Armenia were in Azerbaijan, and all Armenian refugees had anywhere up to California, but not in Armenia. Therein lies, I repeat, in my opinion, the reason that the Armenian people had their state. And, if hypothetically, that the Armenian Nazis manage to create a "Great Armenia from sea to sea", then it will be no one to live.
The practice of weaning of Azerbaijani lands by Armenia artificially created and continued under the Soviet regime, so in 1920, Moscow gave Zangezour Armenian region of Azerbaijan. Then Karabakh was given the status of an autonomous region with the renaming of a small village Hankendi (translated Khan's village) in the neighborhood of Shusha - the capital of Karabakh khanate in Stepanakert after Stepan Shaumyan, one of the 26 Baku commissars participant terrible massacre in 1918, hosted by Dashnak in Baku , making it the capital of autonomy. Typically, the land acquisition was followed by the eviction of the Turkic population, followed by the destruction of landmarks, such as in the center of Yerevan, no trace remains of the city wall and the Khan's palace to the mosque. If the Erivan khanate, where 90% of Azerbaijani Turks and 10% of the population were equally Armenians and the Kurds, today Armenia is perhaps the most mono-ethnic state in the world. Well, that is the latest example of ethnic cleansing - the seizure of the territory of Azerbaijan in the Karabakh war was accompanied by physical destruction of the local population. Throughout the occupied territories of Azerbaijan by Armenia, not a single Azerbaijani. Here we should mention a very important fact, namely the active participation on the side of Armenian military units of the Soviet Army (366 motorized infantry regiment in the attack on Khojaly) and is in addition to the transmission Armenian militants including heavy weapons - artillery, tanks and armored personnel carriers. The tragedy of Khojaly and Aghdam (totally ruined city), this is the most that neither is genocide, as it were the final chord of the enlightened 20th century - the bloodiest in the history of civilization.
Since it has been agreed on a cease-fire took 19 years, but the political resolution of the Karabakh conflict has not been found and is primarily the fault of Russia, which, in fact, supports an aggressive policy of Armenia, so that there is a military base, keeping thus its military presence in the region. At any point you want to eliminate Azerbaijan as the main key competitor sales of hydrocarbons Kremlin could give the go-ahead Armenian Nazis, eager to continue the seizure of the territory under the "Great Armenia".
Of the world's rabble gathered around Putin's Russia, Tehran bigots and Armenian Nazis occupy special place of honor, as strategic allies. Modern Iran is probably the only one on today's full and self-sufficient, unlike Armenia, an ally of Russia. General political and economic problems in the region pull together to Moscow and Tehran, and their alliance directed against the Turkic countries of the Caspian Basin and especially against Azerbaijan as a key participant in all projects on transportation of hydrocarbons to the West. If Moscow sees Azerbaijan as a potentially dangerous competitor, threatening to undermine the monopoly of the Russian market of hydrocarbons, which can result in economic disaster for her, that Iran has more to fear from its northern neighbor.
Having gained independence after nearly 200 years of colonial residence in the Russian Empire Northern Azerbaijan was able to dispose of their wealth. Having chosen the democratic path and rejecting attempts were made to introduce Iran's northern neighbor in the bosom of religion, through the organization of religious schools in Baku and invitations to free education of young people in the Iranian madrasahs (I must pay tribute, this initiative has not generated much enthusiasm nor the Azerbaijani people, nor the authorities) , Azerbaijan today shows the high rate of development and not just economic. Positive changes have affected virtually all areas, including all kinds of international events. Could Azerbaijan, while in the USSR, to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest and take prizes. Freedom has given the opportunity to open Visits Azerbaijan. Modern Baku - shining gem on the coast of the Caspian Sea - a metropolis, the appearance of which is literally permeated with the spirit of the East and the West, a fine example of multiculturalism, which deliberately see the danger of interested parties from Tel Aviv, Baku - the city in which there is no hint of antagonism civilizations, so carefully cultivated by the ayatollahs in Tehran. By the way, if we are talking about Israel and Iran, Azerbaijan is a country may be, by means of which will be to clarify their relationship Israel and Iran.
Independent and successful secular Northern Azerbaijan from 9 million people, like a bone in the throat of Tehran obscurantist, since it is a good example of what can give the people freedom and democracy. This is especially concerned with Iran 35 million Turks of South Azerbaijan, and their natural tendency to unite in a single state. If we add to this the claims of Iran's oil and gas riches of the Caspian Sea, the clear appearance of a strategic axis of the Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran. Evil Empire, has lost all its allies and vassals or rather, did not find anything better than to nourish, myself like a monster that is about to start waving like the Soviet Union raised over World nuclear club. But above all, Iran is a threat to neighboring Muslim countries, and all this rhetoric about Tehran's unfortunate Palestinians only skillfully used propaganda to gain credibility in the Muslim world in the hope that after the Iranian Islamic revolution, followed by other Muslim countries.
We should point out the fact incriminating Islamic clerics in the ideological hypocrisy, namely the fact that, for political purposes, they, along with Christian Armenia and Russia, in fact, are against fellow Shiites of Azerbaijan. This, frankly hostile attitude of the religious regime to the people with whom Iran has for centuries been historically linked illustrates the falsity of hypocrites from Tehran. Under cover of the Koran for intoxication, above all, a devout Iranian people, they are actually guided by purely practical advantage, pushing a seemingly important - Islam, by the wayside.
In a strategic axis of the Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran active role for Armenia. Moscow advantageous to keep the smoldering Karabakh conflict, so that at any point you give the go-ahead to those who taste the smell of blood Armenian Dashnaks, eager to continue the aggression against the people of Azerbaijan. The main purpose of this Armenian Nazis wiped out Northern Azerbaijan, destroying the people of Azerbaijan. It is the physical removal of Azerbaijanis and not the other way, as it has done in the Azerbaijani territory occupied by it as a result of the Karabakh war, it is possible to create a "Greater Armenia". Like the run-flat with chain mad dog Armenian soldiers rush to the flat part of Azerbaijan, to draw in the ruins of Baku and Ganja and put the world with a fait accompli.
However, the implementation of these plans, the enemy is Turkey, which has prevented dashnaks times, in 1918, sent an army to rescue the people of Azerbaijan on the total extermination undertaken by the Dashnak unprecedented scale massacres. In Nagorno-Karabakh war, Turkey could help Azerbaijan, because the war was fought in the Soviet Union, and any action on the part of Turkey would be regarded as outside interference. This time, in the event of an attack of Armenia against Azerbaijan, the situation is fundamentally different. Realizing that Turkey will not remain on the sidelines, the Armenian propaganda was again recently intensively exploited lie about the genocide in hopes to deceive the public, to provide Turkey a pariah of the international community and to organize various kinds of international sanctions, including the military, if Turkey will support Azerbaijan in case of renewal Karabakh conflict.
Here we come to the answer to the question why Armenia is so necessary for Turkey to recognize the Armenian genocide, and even 100 years later, and what lies behind those tenacity with which the Armenian propaganda to spread lies about the genocide. All becomes clear when you consider the purpose of the Armenian Nazis - "Greater Armenia" from sea to sea, which provides for the seizure of northern Azerbaijan. Judging by the undisguised plans Armenian Nazis wiped off the political map of the state of Azerbaijan, they want to neutralize Turkey, tied her hands recognition of the genocide, and would deal with Azerbaijan without the intervention of Turkey. And then, having access to the riches of the Caspian Sea, Armenia, with the support of the all-powerful Armenian lobby has to present a claim to Turkey.
The only thing with a high degree of tension can be accused authorities of the Ottoman Empire is in the disarmament and deportation of Armenians from the front line, where the Armenians committed treacherous massacre of unarmed people, it is insidious, because the Armenians rebelled not against the regular army, and suddenly began to ruthlessly cut civilians. On the other hand, that the authorities could have done to protect the rear in anticipation of the upcoming Russian army. To the credit of the Turkish government, any repressive action not taken by the army of deportation. Not to recall the deportation of Japanese San Francisco and their isolation on the island after the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. By the way, unlike the Armenians in Turkey, the U.S. subjected to deportation and even the Japanese did not give a reason for any statements in support of Japan. In the Turkish authorities did not have at hand the island to move out there hostile Armenians. The tragedy occurred because the deported Armenians were among Turks and Kurds who fled early from the Armenian massacres. Spontaneous violence of the common people of the Armenian rebels who threw the corpses of tortured Muslims wells in the villages to the survivors and thoughts did not think about the return, can hardly be taken as a genocide, as Armenians would like the Nazis of "Faction". Real culprit Dashnak Armenians in Turkey are with their chimerical idea of "Great Armenia", by analogy with the German Nazis, who dream of a "Greater Germany" - the main culprits of the disaster, especially the German people, and the organizers of the genocide of Jews and Gypsies.
In order to deflect the blame, Dashnak advantage of the confusion during the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent decisive war for the Turkish people for their existence, they began manufacturing the fake documents to accuse the authorities in the organization of the extermination of the Armenians. In fact, in all the mess that accompanied the collapse of the empire, was found not a single government circulars, orders, or one small note to begin the prosecution of those found to be engaged in the planning of the genocide. Very illustrative case of the 144 main perpetrators of genocide, the Armenian arrested on a tip-off by the British in 1919 and held in prison in Malta. Which began in 1920, the court was forced to drop all charges for lack of a single document proving their guilt, and this at a time when the whole imperial archive was in the hands of the English and all the persons involved were still alive, by the way, the main accusatory document Andonian book "Talat Pasha Telegrams" was recognized as crude forgery.
If you go back to the same question about the genocide of the Jews, it is well known Nuremberg Trials declared the Nazi Party and the SS pristupnymi organizations of all perpetrators were sentenced to death. In this case was closed, no one was going to judge the German people as opposed to the Armenians, who are clamoring to the Turkish people itself condemned himself to the Armenian genocide, despite consisting of the case to the court of Malta.
Having suffered a complete failure legitimately accuse Turkey of genocide, the Armenians not only did not stop making fakes, but also undertook a global propaganda in the hope to deceive the public and put to the wall is no longer individuals but the whole Turkish nation. It should be noted that the propaganda was accompanied by global terror against the citizens of modern Turkey, without regard to the genocide. The question is, why, in the end, Armenia does not file a complaint with the Hague tribunal or the International Court of Justice? The answer is simple. The fact is that at trial the prosecution of Armenians could easily turn into the accused. By the way, if for a moment forget who started the war in the Pacific, the Americas and can be convicted of genocide of the Japanese, after U.S. atomic bombs were dropped not on purely military targets, and on the densely populated cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed about five hundred thousand the Japanese. The death toll of the Armenians in Turkey is about three hundred thousand (a figure that has grown with time and a half million Armenians obviously too high). But the Japanese, unlike the Armenians did not have enough reason to contrive the subject of genocide. There is ample documentation, including the statute of the party, "ARF" to blame the Dashnak of ethnic cleansing in Turkey in 1915 and Azerbaijan in 1918. Is not that genocide, when in 1918 did far from the "Great Armenia" Kokand (Turkestan) the Armenian diaspora-led Dashnak three days of bloody mutiny completely cut out the local population, making no exceptions neither women nor children.
Nazi entity in conjunction with the Dashnak Armenian diaspora guile after a long silence resurfaced in Karabakh. Here it should be noted that all these ethnic atrocities did not occur without the assistance of Moscow. And now Moscow at any desired moment for it can unleash bloodthirsty Armenian Dashnak whose achievements of Azerbaijan in comparison with the plight of the Armenian cause bestial rage. Russia is well stocked only ally in the Caucasus with modern weapons, including anti-aircraft missiles S-300 and Iskander-M missiles, capable of resulting in an accurate and powerful shot in the rear. Important military-strategic importance, providing excellence in Armenia in case of resumption of Karabakh war, has the presence on its territory of the Russian military base. Talk about the isolation of Armenia is not quite right. First, Armenia is bordered by a friendly Iran, secondly, in case of war, in isolation Azerbaijan is surrounded on three sides by enemies. Talk about a common border with Georgia is not necessary, because the location of Georgia in this case is quite the same. On the part of Caspian Sea, Azerbaijan is easily blocked by the vastly superior military and naval forces of Russia and Iran. Small wonder that in recent years, these countries are increasing their military presence in the Caspian Sea, introducing frigates and missile boats, presumably to protect the ecological environment of the Caspian Sea, which they see a threat in the laying of the Trans-Caspian gas pipeline between Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan. In this particular concern in Moscow about the ecology of the Caspian Sea was observed for decades ruthless exploitation of oil fields, resulting in the Bay of Baku was turned into fuel oil sump. It looks like the hypocrites and the Kremlin is now a little worried about the state of the Baltic Sea environment, which is laid on the bottom of the "Nord Stream", but for the environment of the Caspian Sea, they are even ready to fight, and away from their shores.
Thus, political and economic issues, as well as the aggressive ambitions of the three countries in the region are solved loss of independence, if not disappearing from the political map of the state of Azerbaijan. The only question is when this will happen, that is, when Armenia with the permission of Russia will unleash war. It is necessary to take into account the fact that Yerevan can independently provoke a war, so as not to miss the military superiority. It is clear that Turkey can not afford to stay on the sidelines and will inevitably clash with Russia. One might wonder how NATO can respond quickly. If we imagine that the West will hand over to Turkey and Azerbaijan, the next in line will be the countries - the former Soviet Central Asian colonies and of course Georgia. In short there is nothing left Moscow as soon as the request of the peoples of these countries together free expression of the will wishing to reunite with Russia. And the West will get a second cold war.
Such a scenario is possible under certain impotence of the West. American presidents are increasingly good economic managers and economists, such for example as Franklin Roosevelt, who in the policy relied more on Uncle Joe (Stalin) than Winston Churchill, which led to big problems after the Second World War. It looks like the West is required for sobering new "Fulton speech." How much can you step on the same rake! This brings to mind the wisdom of the east "drink milk snake, is like poison to save it." "A friend of Putin" in layman from Bush's policies still show the world grin renewed empire of evil. In confirmation of what has been said is very indicative protection "friend Putin" the Syrian dictator who "wets" his people, like Putin, "drenched in the outhouse" Chechens. But then the West silently watched the massacre Putin on Chechen people. There is a fundamental difference in this example?
The world was very lucky in the Second World War that began her aggressors Germany and Russia (1) clashed with each other in mortal combat, otherwise the political map would be completely different today. But is it worth playing dice, hoping to get lucky and just observe how nurture Evil Empire Kremlin false democracy, holding a chain, ready to aggression, the Nazis of "Great Armenia" and the roofs of Tehran obscurantist, stretching out their hands to the nuclear club.