Trump's so going to prison
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/12/roger-stone-trump-tweet-witness-tampering/
So much prison...
Topic: Trump for Noose - Tax Fraud (Read 489 times)
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/trump-tries-to-block-discovery-in-emoluments-case
Trump's so going to prison
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/12/roger-stone-trump-tweet-witness-tampering/
So much prison...
Trump's so going to prison
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/12/roger-stone-trump-tweet-witness-tampering/
So much prison...
Weisselman was Trump Company and family finance guy for like 40 years and he has been co-operating with the SDNY for MONTHS. Anything SDNY had Mueller had. Trump is just piling on the horse shit so fast everyday no one can keep up and focus long on any one story. That will change when the Mueller report hits and Congress starts airing Trumps illegal activities. People forget (or willfully ignore) how much evidence Meuller and the SDNY have. Weisselman knows ALL of Trumps shit cause he fucking paid it all LOL, and to save his own stupid old ass he flipped on the pussy grabber.
Tick tock tick tock the bell toll for Trump soooooooon!
Pretty much. The best bit is after Trump and Pence go to jail; the speaker for the house will become president.
In January, that's a democrat.
Gotta remember, Pence was picked by Manafort, who's neck deep into this shit. I doubt Pence is clean.
I'm assuming 25 years of jail for Pence; death for Trump.
Weisselman was Trump Company and family finance guy for like 40 years and he has been co-operating with the SDNY for MONTHS. Anything SDNY had Mueller had. Trump is just piling on the horse shit so fast everyday no one can keep up and focus long on any one story. That will change when the Mueller report hits and Congress starts airing Trumps illegal activities. People forget (or willfully ignore) how much evidence Meuller and the SDNY have. Weisselman knows ALL of Trumps shit cause he fucking paid it all LOL, and to save his own stupid old ass he flipped on the pussy grabber.
Tick tock tick tock the bell toll for Trump soooooooon!
Actually he is right. Paying income taxes in the US is technically voluntary. Does that mean they won't come after you? Hell no, they will, however he is technically correct on this point.
Technically, breathing is voluntary. Does that mean that you can stop breathing? Why don't you find out?
Nobody owes the income tax except those who admit they do. If taxing agent says you owe a tax, he is required by law to show you why - where you knowingly said you would give up some of you private property as taxes.
... blah blah blah, bullshit...
... blah blah blah, bullshit...
You obviously don't have an understanding of law, do you? Congress has the ability to create laws and taxation. If you refuse to pay your fair share, you should be held accountable.
If you refuse to pay your taxes, then you shouldn't be allowed public services. Might as well declare your own sovereign nation at that point. Rofl.
I'd love to see BADecker kicked off public services (such as the Internet).
Actually he is right. Paying income taxes in the US is technically voluntary. Does that mean they won't come after you? Hell no, they will, however he is technically correct on this point.
Nobody owes the income tax except those who admit they do. If taxing agent says you owe a tax, he is required by law to show you why - where you knowingly said you would give up some of you private property as taxes.
... blah blah blah, bullshit...
... blah blah blah, bullshit...
You obviously don't have an understanding of law, do you? Congress has the ability to create laws and taxation. If you refuse to pay your fair share, you should be held accountable.
If you refuse to pay your taxes, then you shouldn't be allowed public services. Might as well declare your own sovereign nation at that point. Rofl.
I'd love to see BADecker kicked off public services (such as the Internet).
Nobody owes the income tax except those who admit they do. If taxing agent says you owe a tax, he is required by law to show you why - where you knowingly said you would give up some of you private property as taxes.
Why? This is a private property country. Nobody is allowed to steal it from you, and you aren't part of the government, so you haven't agreed to pay.
Nobody in government has the right to sign you up for something you don't want. Not even the draft - military. Punishment comes when it can be shown that you haven't followed through with something you agreed to.
Trump and his people are simply using the law regarding taxation. Those who say he is guilty haven't looked in detail, and aren't privy to how he runs his personal affairs. They are going off half-cocked, because they don't know the details of how he has done it right.
Why? This is a private property country. Nobody is allowed to steal it from you, and you aren't part of the government, so you haven't agreed to pay.
Nobody in government has the right to sign you up for something you don't want. Not even the draft - military. Punishment comes when it can be shown that you haven't followed through with something you agreed to.
Trump and his people are simply using the law regarding taxation. Those who say he is guilty haven't looked in detail, and aren't privy to how he runs his personal affairs. They are going off half-cocked, because they don't know the details of how he has done it right.
Now that the dems have the house they will be subpoenaing the IRS for Trumps tax returns!
Trump went bankrupt 6 times, lost all his daddy's money and literally couldn't get a loan from any American banks. The Russians where happy to bail him out though!
A lot of legal analysts believe Mueller has had Trump's tax returns for months but it will be interesting if we end up getting to see them as well!
Mueller is not what he makes himself out to be and that's a legit person..Shame he couldn't investigate Obama ..Trump went bankrupt 6 times, lost all his daddy's money and literally couldn't get a loan from any American banks. The Russians where happy to bail him out though!
A lot of legal analysts believe Mueller has had Trump's tax returns for months but it will be interesting if we end up getting to see them as well!
So tell me this was it ok for the dems to talk and be merry with Russia and Putin's crew BUT as soon as trump won OH the RUSSIAN'S back to the 1950s were i can imagine because of NO INTERNET propaganda was 1000 times worse much easier to lie to the masses back in the 1950s ..Get in power and stay in power your life becomes RICH..
And like i said before trump won you watch if he wins all the money vampires will be out in force spreading all kinds of lies ..
Now if the Russians are not so nice why was they nice when Obama was in power? ..Look below and see who has met who the most..
BUSTED! OBAMA Held 22 Secret Meetings With Top Russian Spy..
While the liberals are frothing at the mouths and pointing to Trump’s supposed ties with Russia, they have blinded themselves to the fact that Obama met with a Russian operative 22 times.
The Russian is Sergey Kislyak, who is the very same man who talked with Michael Flynn. He visited the White House multiple times between 2009 and 2016, and met with Obama’s top advisers. Why exactly did they meet so often?
The last time Kislyak appeared at the White House was September 2016, just a month before the outcome of the presidential election was announced.
Kislyak had a meeting with John Holdren, a top Obama adviser, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. Others at the meeting include Sergey Sarazhinskiy, Marina W. Gross, Vyacheslv Balakirev, Alexander Ermolaev, and Alexey Lopatin.
The meeting was scheduled to start at noon, but there is no record of when it ended. Kislyak also visited the White House twice in 2009, six times in 2010, twice in 2012, once in 2013, twice in 2014, once in 2015, and four times in 2016.
The logs note which officials from the White House met with Kislyak, some include: Holdren (two visits); Gary Samore, senior official of National Security Council on weapons of mass destruction (four visits); Robert Malley, Obama’s senior adviser of destroying ISIS (three visits); Michael Froman, Obama’s trade representative (one visit); Lawrence Summers, Obama’s economic adviser (one visit); and the visitor’s office (four visits).
There are an additional 12 visits where Kislyak attended events like the “diplomatic corps reception” and the “holiday open house.”
But the visitor’s logs that were kept during Obama’s time in the White House are known for their inaccuracies, so who knows how pften Kislyak really came to the White House. Sometimes, scheduled but unfilled appointments are also listed.
One thing is for certain, Kislyak was very welcome at the White House during Obama’s time. So, why the sudden Russian accusations coming from the left? It seems that Obama had no problem inviting the “evil Russians” to meetings while he was in charge.
See i think what happened was many in the DEMS from FBI to police to judges LOST OUT BIG TIME
...95% OF politicians are RATS on both sides of the fence and we as people know this so we hope which RAT will give us the best life and that's all we can hope from
LYING RATS ... We the people know all the LYING POLITICAL RATS but which RAT will offer us the best life..
You don't spend billions on a campaign to not want some thing back if your wages are only 250k..
250k x by 10 years 2.5 million in wages does not cover a 1 billion dollar campaign SO why do they do this ? YES TO BE A RAT..
The DEMS are for poor voters Not for the rich because not many of them vote DEMS because of tax purposes ..
So the DEMS are like our LABOUR PARTY and they invite more poor to get votes Just think when your country does well the poor voters party looses out on votes so they bring in more ..
Both parties play money trick games with the PUBLIC all to suck monies out of you or your future children not even born yet with DEBT..
"Re: Trump for Noose - Tax Fraud"
Since when do they hang people for tax fraud anyway? Good luck with your endless diversion from facts.
Since when do they hang people for tax fraud anyway? Good luck with your endless diversion from facts.
It's not tax fraud, it's paying for a great team of accountants that are able to use the code to your advantage. Do you want to know who makes the IRS tax code? - Congress.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
No, he's falsified records. He's abused the tax code to take advantage of special situations by forging, faking, and lying constantly.
It's seems to be a serial case of fraud in his case...
I mean, let's start with his campaign, alright?
....
No let's not start with the campaign. Let's start with exactly what YOU STARTED WITH and have you show the facts. Namely all those tax law violations.
As for the Cohen payments to the girls, which Trump made with his own money, not campaign money, you have a technical point of law there.
It's not tax fraud, it's paying for a great team of accountants that are able to use the code to your advantage. Do you want to know who makes the IRS tax code? - Congress.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
No, he's falsified records. He's abused the tax code to take advantage of special situations by forging, faking, and lying constantly.
It's seems to be a serial case of fraud in his case...
I mean, let's start with his campaign, alright?
He abused tax exempt funding to pay for sexual interactions... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/nyregion/michael-cohen-plea-deal-trump.html
That's 8 recent cases out in the open.
Shall we dig into every single one of those, or do you say none of those happened and Cohen is entirely unrelated to Trump and his business and he did all the law violation himself against best wishes of Trump (which he says the exact opposite). I mean, come on man... look at reality.
If you want the indictment, here you are; https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/press-release/file/1021801/download
It's not tax fraud, it's paying for a great team of accountants that are able to use the code to your advantage. Do you want to know who makes the IRS tax code? - Congress.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
No, he's falsified records. He's abused the tax code to take advantage of special situations by forging, faking, and lying constantly.
It's seems to be a serial case of fraud in his case...
It's not tax fraud, it's paying for a great team of accountants that are able to use the code to your advantage. Do you want to know who makes the IRS tax code? - Congress.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
No, he's falsified records. He's abused the tax code to take advantage of special situations by forging, faking, and lying constantly.
It's seems to be a serial case of fraud in his case; he's always had his wealth to bail him out. However, now the entire world's shining light on his dirty cons.
It's not tax fraud, it's paying for a great team of accountants that are able to use the code to your advantage. Do you want to know who makes the IRS tax code? - Congress.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
Do you want to know who still makes the IRS tax code? Congress.
It's a place to give back to their voters and supporters, and that's how politics works sadly.
Now that the dems have the house they will be subpoenaing the IRS for Trumps tax returns!
Trump went bankrupt 6 times, lost all his daddy's money and literally couldn't get a loan from any American banks. The Russians where happy to bail him out though!
A lot of legal analysts believe Mueller has had Trump's tax returns for months but it will be interesting if we end up getting to see them as well!
Trump went bankrupt 6 times, lost all his daddy's money and literally couldn't get a loan from any American banks. The Russians where happy to bail him out though!
A lot of legal analysts believe Mueller has had Trump's tax returns for months but it will be interesting if we end up getting to see them as well!
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/415258-russian-oligarch-who-bought-mansion-from-trump-arrested-on
Oh, look at that, another connection to fraud.
Oh, look at that, another connection to fraud.
IDIOTIC SHIT THAT OBVIOUSLY DIDN'T READ THE ARTICLE
Turns out Trump wasn't a genius real estate agent, but just accepting bribes
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/415258-russian-oligarch-who-bought-mansion-from-trump-arrested-on
Oh, look at that, another connection to fraud.
Oh, look at that, another connection to fraud.
Oh look, more guilt by extremely loose association. The man's business was real estate and he sold a Russian a house! GUILTY AS CHARGED!!!
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/415258-russian-oligarch-who-bought-mansion-from-trump-arrested-on
Oh, look at that, another connection to fraud.
Oh, look at that, another connection to fraud.
....
If he was audited, then the investigation could be on-going. Statue of limitations only apply to un-investigated crimes.....
If he was audited, then the investigation could be on-going. Statue of limitations only apply to un-investigated crimes.....
Ongoing from 2004? An estate tax case going on for 14 years?
Interesting theory.
By the way, wouldn't you think that the guilty party that deserved that Noose would be Estate Executor, not the heirs?
But somehow Trump is the one ....
Ahahaha, estate executor for an estate that's worth an IOU note.
You're funny dude.
Nah, cash was funneled. You'd know this if you bothered to read the article.
Ive seen couple of news for him and from that what I read - I don't like this guy. Maybe Clinton was the better option. When you look at this guy you can understand that he is not good.
....
If he was audited, then the investigation could be on-going. Statue of limitations only apply to un-investigated crimes.....
If he was audited, then the investigation could be on-going. Statue of limitations only apply to un-investigated crimes.....
Ongoing from 2004? An estate tax case going on for 14 years?
Interesting theory.
By the way, wouldn't you think that the guilty party that deserved that Noose would be Estate Executor, not the heirs?
But somehow Trump is the one ....
Holman Jenkins Jr., wrote in his editorial column on Saturday (today) in the WSJ discussing this very topic.
He pointed out that the ultrawealthy generally do not pay the death tax, and that many of the world's billionaires (including those in very good heath) have spent a lot of resources over many years shielding their assets from being subject to the death tax. The type of trust the Trump family used is apparently the same type of trust the family that owns the New York Times uses.
Importantly, as of multiple decades ago, the statute of limitations expired, and as such Trump faces no criminal liability for this alleged fraud. Also, Trump has faced multiple audits over the years (given his income, it would be expected for him to be audited every year or nearly every year), and as such, it is almost certain the IRS has already reviewed these tax returns and found no issue (or any issues found have been resolved).
Probably the most interesting quote from Jenkins in the piece is "Show me a wealthy entrepreneur whose family paid the death tax of 55% (now 40%) and I will show you an entrepreneur who died unexpectedly".
After reading articles like the one the OP referenced, it makes me wonder why anyone trusts the New York Times anymore.
He pointed out that the ultrawealthy generally do not pay the death tax, and that many of the world's billionaires (including those in very good heath) have spent a lot of resources over many years shielding their assets from being subject to the death tax. The type of trust the Trump family used is apparently the same type of trust the family that owns the New York Times uses.
Importantly, as of multiple decades ago, the statute of limitations expired, and as such Trump faces no criminal liability for this alleged fraud. Also, Trump has faced multiple audits over the years (given his income, it would be expected for him to be audited every year or nearly every year), and as such, it is almost certain the IRS has already reviewed these tax returns and found no issue (or any issues found have been resolved).
Probably the most interesting quote from Jenkins in the piece is "Show me a wealthy entrepreneur whose family paid the death tax of 55% (now 40%) and I will show you an entrepreneur who died unexpectedly".
After reading articles like the one the OP referenced, it makes me wonder why anyone trusts the New York Times anymore.
This sort of logic is wrong. "It's alright that they're breaking the law because others are breaking the law" is a terrible argument in general.
If people are abusing loopholes in a system, probably a good idea to patch those loopholes and prosecute those that were exploiting it. Not just throwing your hands in the air and doing nothing about it.
Trump for noose seems to be a good way to start correcting the violations of law by ultra-wealthy. Similar to French guillotining during revolutions.
In order for any of this to be illegal, it would need to explicitly against the law. The IRS and NY equipment presumably reviewed the tax returns and presumably found nothing illegal.
No, I'm afraid it's not abuse. For a good example of this, look at the rules for taxation of private jet flights. It is what it is, but it'll get you mad just looking at it.
Fuck off this thread with unrelated content. This thread is meant to highlight not only tax fraud, but other criminal activities of Trump.
.....
Hmm... I would have thought you'd relate to the Trump private jet as being yet another criminal activity of Trump, but I guess not.
No, I'm afraid it's not abuse. For a good example of this, look at the rules for taxation of private jet flights. It is what it is, but it'll get you mad just looking at it.
Fuck off this thread with unrelated content. This thread is meant to highlight not only tax fraud, but other criminal activities of Trump.
Not to introduce "whataboutism" and "deflection". I really should have just made this thread moderated instead to handle shit like this.
...
If people are abusing loopholes in a system, probably a good idea to patch those loopholes and prosecute those that were exploiting it. ...
If people are abusing loopholes in a system, probably a good idea to patch those loopholes and prosecute those that were exploiting it. ...
But using is not abusing, right?
Uhh, utilizing loopholes in the system is akin to abuse.
Trump and Nunes both for Noose
No, I'm afraid it's not abuse. For a good example of this, look at the rules for taxation of private jet flights. It is what it is, but it'll get you mad just looking at it.
...
If people are abusing loopholes in a system, probably a good idea to patch those loopholes and prosecute those that were exploiting it. ...
If people are abusing loopholes in a system, probably a good idea to patch those loopholes and prosecute those that were exploiting it. ...
But using is not abusing, right?
Uhh, utilizing loopholes in the system is akin to abuse.
We're supposed to have a branch that allows the law to vary somewhat (interpreting the letter of the law vs the meaning behind the law). So, if you're supposed to pay, and don't... and play word games with the law to avoid it, the courts are supposed to shut that shit down.
Trump and Nunes both for Noose
...
If people are abusing loopholes in a system, probably a good idea to patch those loopholes and prosecute those that were exploiting it. ...
If people are abusing loopholes in a system, probably a good idea to patch those loopholes and prosecute those that were exploiting it. ...
But using is not abusing, right?
A lot of estate tax law is pretty obscure and most people never have to deal with it...
For example if you inherit stocks, you only pay tax when you sell them. Apply that to Trump, and you can see how it might "benefit him."
Holman Jenkins Jr., wrote in his editorial column on Saturday (today) in the WSJ discussing this very topic.
He pointed out that the ultrawealthy generally do not pay the death tax, and that many of the world's billionaires (including those in very good heath) have spent a lot of resources over many years shielding their assets from being subject to the death tax. The type of trust the Trump family used is apparently the same type of trust the family that owns the New York Times uses.
Importantly, as of multiple decades ago, the statute of limitations expired, and as such Trump faces no criminal liability for this alleged fraud. Also, Trump has faced multiple audits over the years (given his income, it would be expected for him to be audited every year or nearly every year), and as such, it is almost certain the IRS has already reviewed these tax returns and found no issue (or any issues found have been resolved).
Probably the most interesting quote from Jenkins in the piece is "Show me a wealthy entrepreneur whose family paid the death tax of 55% (now 40%) and I will show you an entrepreneur who died unexpectedly".
After reading articles like the one the OP referenced, it makes me wonder why anyone trusts the New York Times anymore.
He pointed out that the ultrawealthy generally do not pay the death tax, and that many of the world's billionaires (including those in very good heath) have spent a lot of resources over many years shielding their assets from being subject to the death tax. The type of trust the Trump family used is apparently the same type of trust the family that owns the New York Times uses.
Importantly, as of multiple decades ago, the statute of limitations expired, and as such Trump faces no criminal liability for this alleged fraud. Also, Trump has faced multiple audits over the years (given his income, it would be expected for him to be audited every year or nearly every year), and as such, it is almost certain the IRS has already reviewed these tax returns and found no issue (or any issues found have been resolved).
Probably the most interesting quote from Jenkins in the piece is "Show me a wealthy entrepreneur whose family paid the death tax of 55% (now 40%) and I will show you an entrepreneur who died unexpectedly".
After reading articles like the one the OP referenced, it makes me wonder why anyone trusts the New York Times anymore.
This sort of logic is wrong. "It's alright that they're breaking the law because others are breaking the law" is a terrible argument in general.
If people are abusing loopholes in a system, probably a good idea to patch those loopholes and prosecute those that were exploiting it. Not just throwing your hands in the air and doing nothing about it.
Trump for noose seems to be a good way to start correcting the violations of law by ultra-wealthy. Similar to French guillotining during revolutions.
Holman Jenkins Jr., wrote in his editorial column on Saturday (today) in the WSJ discussing this very topic.
He pointed out that the ultrawealthy generally do not pay the death tax, and that many of the world's billionaires (including those in very good heath) have spent a lot of resources over many years shielding their assets from being subject to the death tax. The type of trust the Trump family used is apparently the same type of trust the family that owns the New York Times uses.
Importantly, as of multiple decades ago, the statute of limitations expired, and as such Trump faces no criminal liability for this alleged fraud. Also, Trump has faced multiple audits over the years (given his income, it would be expected for him to be audited every year or nearly every year), and as such, it is almost certain the IRS has already reviewed these tax returns and found no issue (or any issues found have been resolved).
Probably the most interesting quote from Jenkins in the piece is "Show me a wealthy entrepreneur whose family paid the death tax of 55% (now 40%) and I will show you an entrepreneur who died unexpectedly".
After reading articles like the one the OP referenced, it makes me wonder why anyone trusts the New York Times anymore.
He pointed out that the ultrawealthy generally do not pay the death tax, and that many of the world's billionaires (including those in very good heath) have spent a lot of resources over many years shielding their assets from being subject to the death tax. The type of trust the Trump family used is apparently the same type of trust the family that owns the New York Times uses.
Importantly, as of multiple decades ago, the statute of limitations expired, and as such Trump faces no criminal liability for this alleged fraud. Also, Trump has faced multiple audits over the years (given his income, it would be expected for him to be audited every year or nearly every year), and as such, it is almost certain the IRS has already reviewed these tax returns and found no issue (or any issues found have been resolved).
Probably the most interesting quote from Jenkins in the piece is "Show me a wealthy entrepreneur whose family paid the death tax of 55% (now 40%) and I will show you an entrepreneur who died unexpectedly".
After reading articles like the one the OP referenced, it makes me wonder why anyone trusts the New York Times anymore.
...
In reality, Trump deserves a noose around his neck and to be hanged in public.
In reality, Trump deserves a noose around his neck and to be hanged in public.
Hey, while we're at it, let's disqualify any SC judge wannabe that any woman has thrown an accusation at.
Fuck off this thread with that nonsense retard.
--
In this thread, we're discussing how Trump constantly breaks the laws without repercussions that normal Americans would face.
The super class inherited wealth elite don't play by the same rules; "Rules for thee, not for me".
This needs to change. I say it started with Trump with a noose around his neck. Good riddance to the scumbag pathological liar, con artist thief.
...
In reality, Trump deserves a noose around his neck and to be hanged in public.
In reality, Trump deserves a noose around his neck and to be hanged in public.
Hey, while we're at it, let's disqualify any SC judge wannabe that any woman has thrown an accusation at.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html
People like Trump are absolute scum.
People like Trump are absolute scum.
Your own article says the opposite of what you claim. Citing,
The president’s parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances.
The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show.
The president declined repeated requests over several weeks to comment for this article. But a lawyer for Mr. Trump, Charles J. Harder, provided a written statement on Monday, one day after The Times sent a detailed description of its findings. “The New York Times’s allegations of fraud and tax evasion are 100 percent false, and highly defamatory,” Mr. Harder said. “There was no fraud or tax evasion by anyone. The facts upon which The Times bases its false allegations are extremely inaccurate.”
Nobody is required to organize their tax work so that the government gets the most from them....
Uhh, $50MM on taxes on over a billion dollars of inheritance? Cool story bro. Maybe if you actually read the article and see where it points out this isn't legal.
This whitehouse constantly puts out lies, yet you believe them readily over reality, even when they've been proven to be lies over and over.
Trump deserves a noose around his neck. He deserves to be hanged in public for the world to see.
The article is heavy on smear and innuendo.
But you seem to think you can take that and translate it to "People like Trump are scum."
"Trump deserves a noose around his neck. He deserves to be hanged in public for the world to see."
Have fun.
Where's the proof of the audit? Trump's word means absolutely nothing.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4515567-451130-2018-the-People-of-the-Stat-v-the-People.html
Huh, pretty active law case.
If he was audited, then the investigation could be on-going. Statue of limitations only apply to un-investigated crimes. You're not a lawyer, even though you pretend to be one. Really, you like throwing misinformation at people.
In reality, Trump deserves a noose around his neck and to be hanged in public.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html
People like Trump are absolute scum.
People like Trump are absolute scum.
Your own article says the opposite of what you claim. Citing,
The president’s parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances.
The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show.
The president declined repeated requests over several weeks to comment for this article. But a lawyer for Mr. Trump, Charles J. Harder, provided a written statement on Monday, one day after The Times sent a detailed description of its findings. “The New York Times’s allegations of fraud and tax evasion are 100 percent false, and highly defamatory,” Mr. Harder said. “There was no fraud or tax evasion by anyone. The facts upon which The Times bases its false allegations are extremely inaccurate.”
Nobody is required to organize their tax work so that the government gets the most from them....
Uhh, $50MM on taxes on over a billion dollars of inheritance? Cool story bro. Maybe if you actually read the article and see where it points out this isn't legal.
This whitehouse constantly puts out lies, yet you believe them readily over reality, even when they've been proven to be lies over and over.
Trump deserves a noose around his neck. He deserves to be hanged in public for the world to see.
The article is heavy on smear and innuendo.
But you seem to think you can take that and translate it to "People like Trump are scum."
"Trump deserves a noose around his neck. He deserves to be hanged in public for the world to see."
Have fun.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html
People like Trump are absolute scum.
People like Trump are absolute scum.
Your own article says the opposite of what you claim. Citing,
The president’s parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances.
The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show.
The president declined repeated requests over several weeks to comment for this article. But a lawyer for Mr. Trump, Charles J. Harder, provided a written statement on Monday, one day after The Times sent a detailed description of its findings. “The New York Times’s allegations of fraud and tax evasion are 100 percent false, and highly defamatory,” Mr. Harder said. “There was no fraud or tax evasion by anyone. The facts upon which The Times bases its false allegations are extremely inaccurate.”
Nobody is required to organize their tax work so that the government gets the most from them....
Uhh, $50MM on taxes on over a billion dollars of inheritance? Cool story bro. Maybe if you actually read the article and see where it points out this isn't legal.
This whitehouse constantly puts out lies, yet you believe them readily over reality, even when they've been proven to be lies over and over.
Trump deserves a noose around his neck. He deserves to be hanged in public for the world to see.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html
People like Trump are absolute scum.
People like Trump are absolute scum.
Your own article says the opposite of what you claim. Citing,
The president’s parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances.
The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show.
The president declined repeated requests over several weeks to comment for this article. But a lawyer for Mr. Trump, Charles J. Harder, provided a written statement on Monday, one day after The Times sent a detailed description of its findings. “The New York Times’s allegations of fraud and tax evasion are 100 percent false, and highly defamatory,” Mr. Harder said. “There was no fraud or tax evasion by anyone. The facts upon which The Times bases its false allegations are extremely inaccurate.”
Nobody is required to organize their tax work so that the government gets the most from them....
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html
People like Trump are absolute scum.
The New York times have shown themselves to be vocal opponents of Donald Trump and I for one am not going to believe a single word that this biased newspaper says about Trump. They will always be against him even if he rains gold from heaven. People like Trump are absolute scum.
It's terrible that people inherit money. It's far better that presidents like Clinton and Obama steal it from the country.
Please note - The personal opinion of Jet Cash is the opposite of the above statement.
Please note - The personal opinion of Jet Cash is the opposite of the above statement.
Kek. Presidents stealing from the country? Are you sure you're not confusing Obama/Clinton with TRUMP?
Literally being sued over stealing from the people it in New York. Obama was never sued like this. Nor was Clinton.
---
In reality, the scumbag lied to everyone constantly about his wealth. The scumbag refused to pay taxes, collaborated with a hostile foreign state, etc... pretty much if any non-wealthy, non-trust-fund American citizens were charged with similar crimes, they'd be put to death.
---
Projection seems to be your strong suit, doesn't it?
"MY GUY'S INNOCENT! LOOK AT THESE OTHER GULITY GUYS INSTEAD!!!!" - Jet Cash
"But they're innocent. Trump's the gulity" - Bluefirecorp
"NURRRR! OBAMACUCK/CROOKED CLINTON IS GUILTY!!!!!#i#!i!#i!i# NO PROOF OTHER THAN MY WORD!" - Jet Cash
It's terrible that people inherit money. It's far better that presidents like Clinton and Obama steal it from the country.
Please note - The personal opinion of Jet Cash is the opposite of the above statement.
Please note - The personal opinion of Jet Cash is the opposite of the above statement.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html
People like Trump are absolute scum.
People like Trump are absolute scum.
Jump to: