Topic: Trump is obliged to.....? (Read 115 times)
What's wrong with him? How is he worse than Biden?
It's all conspiracy, I think.
Trump’s biggest financial supporter is Miriam Adelson and one of his first appointees is radical Zionist Elise Stefanik, receiver of the Miriam Adelson Defender of Israel award. It is clear who Trump is beholden to and it certainly isn’t Russia, nor the American people.
There is something I don't understand yet from the whole political and economical idea of Trump ending the logistical help for Ukraine. During his campaign he has said The USA is sending money in a wasteful way to Ukraine (in the form of weapons and defense systems), but if the congress stopped the aid for Ukraine the Republican party would not do anything beneficial for the people of the USA with that money anyways, because anything related to public spending could be considered to be too "communist" or "socialist", for example: enhancing medicaid or social security.
I dont see the urgency on stopping those packages for Ukraine, if the money is not going to be used in USA. Actually, the money is more likely to be sent to Israel instead.
I dont see the urgency on stopping those packages for Ukraine, if the money is not going to be used in USA. Actually, the money is more likely to be sent to Israel instead.
In the current regime, and the way things stand right now with Trump not in office, yet, you are most probably right about money not getting to Americans. Consider Social Security payments. Two years ago the SS increase was over 8%. Last year was 3.2%. Coming up it is only 2.5%. But everybody knows that practical living for average old folks was way more than this. All you need to do is consider housing and grocery increases.
Trump has promised to benefit those elderly living on their SS check. What he will do is yet to be seen. But taking money from Ukraine and giving it to the elderly will surely benefit them.
The Democrat Party elected Trump by being so obnoxious that nobody could stand them. Trump is obliged to not act like them.
Nice one, I would give you merit there, if I could. We do not know how many secret obligations Trump has made. We do know, to some extent, he needs to "obey" or they will start up more assassination attempts asap. History tells us Ronald Reagan was much less pro freedom and fiscally conservative, starting shortly after his famous assassination attempt.
Thanks for the Merit wishes.
With Matt Gaetz on Trump's team, and Tulsi Gabbard to be the new Director of National Intelligence, if Trump is assassinated, the crooks will be found out. Gabbard, herself, will keep it from happening. Of course, the DoD might nuke Washington, D.C. if they think they can get away with it.
The Democrat Party elected Trump by being so obnoxious that nobody could stand them. Trump is obliged to not act like them.
Nice one, I would give you merit there, if I could. We do not know how many secret obligations Trump has made. We do know, to some extent, he needs to "obey" or they will start up more assassination attempts asap. History tells us Ronald Reagan was much less pro freedom and fiscally conservative, starting shortly after his famous assassination attempt.
There is something I don't understand yet from the whole political and economical idea of Trump ending the logistical help for Ukraine. During his campaign he has said The USA is sending money in a wasteful way to Ukraine (in the form of weapons and defense systems), but if the congress stopped the aid for Ukraine the Republican party would not do anything beneficial for the people of the USA with that money anyways, because anything related to public spending could be considered to be too "communist" or "socialist", for example: enhancing medicaid or social security.
I dont see the urgency on stopping those packages for Ukraine, if the money is not going to be used in USA. Actually, the money is more likely to be sent to Israel instead.
I dont see the urgency on stopping those packages for Ukraine, if the money is not going to be used in USA. Actually, the money is more likely to be sent to Israel instead.
For those who don't know this I remind that Patrushev is "a member of Putin's inner circle, and a former director of the Federal Security Service (FSB)" i.e. the man who knows what he is saying.
I don't believe that Russians know what they're saying and their position within the government doesn't matter.
I can give you a couple things that they stood by and these things happened to be false.
For instance, they denied having any anti air batteries in Ukraine and claimed they were not involved in shooting down Malaysian airliner.
They also claimed they'd defeat Ukraine in 3 days. I could keep going because Russian foreign politics is built on boasting, threatening and lying.
I don't believe there are real connections between Trump and Putin and its in the interest of Democrats to suggest it.
The Democrat Party elected Trump by being so obnoxious that nobody could stand them. Trump is obliged to not act like them.
I think Nikolai Patrushev didn't say that Donald Trump won the election through a third party rather than election pledges.
The reality is opposite to what you think. His wording published by Russian media is following:
Quote from: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7296438
If you know Russian you may read the whole interview by yourself and see for yourself that he indeed said that, otherwise use Google translate service.
For those who don't know this I remind that Patrushev is "a member of Putin's inner circle, and a former director of the Federal Security Service (FSB)" i.e. the man who knows what he is saying.
They made clear that Trump was elected through 3rd party will rather than through his election pledges.
Quote
To achieve success in the elections, Donald Trump relied on certain forces to which he has corresponding obligations. And as a responsible person, he will be obliged to fulfill them.
During the preelection period, he made many statements to attract voters to his side, who ultimately voted against the destructive foreign and domestic policies pursued by the current U.S. presidential administration.
https://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-nikolai-patrushev-donald-trump-russia-1984360
During the preelection period, he made many statements to attract voters to his side, who ultimately voted against the destructive foreign and domestic policies pursued by the current U.S. presidential administration.
https://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-nikolai-patrushev-donald-trump-russia-1984360
I think Nikolai Patrushev didn't say that Donald Trump won the election through a third party rather than election pledges. It was the news outlet TASS that came up with such a narrative. Even when he said Trump relied on some force to win the elections, he made it clear that it was his campaign promises which were different from the policies of the present government that made him win the elections.
Quote
What do you think who is that 3rd party which pulls Trump's head in and whether he will fulfill his obligation or just F.... that 3rd party off?
There have been reports of Russia influencing the US elections and since this report is coming from an ally of Putin, one can assume that the third party is Russia. Trump's obligation might be connected to his promise to end the war between Russia and Ukraine in one day. There are indications that Trump might favour Russia in the negotiations for peace. A close ally of Trump, Bryan Lanza who worked with him in this election said that Ukraine's main focus should be peace and not gaining back annexed territories. Although Trump has distanced himself from Lanza's comments it could also be an indication of what might happen.
Trump wants to cut US massive financial support to Ukraine. I suspect that he might fulfill the pledge to end the war but I don't know how he intends to achieve that.
Patrushev: "To achieve success in the elections, Donald Trump relied on certain forces to which he has corresponding obligations. And as a responsible person, he will be obliged to fulfill them". Russian news agency namely TASS reverberated this..
They made clear that Trump was elected through 3rd party will rather than through his election pledges.
What do you think who is that 3rd party which pulls Trump's head in and whether he will fulfill his obligation or just F.... that 3rd party off?
They made clear that Trump was elected through 3rd party will rather than through his election pledges.
What do you think who is that 3rd party which pulls Trump's head in and whether he will fulfill his obligation or just F.... that 3rd party off?
Jump to: