Topic: Trump Says Military Should Handle ‘Radical Left Lunatics’ If... (Read 116 times)

Ironically, the definition of lunatic depends much on the political context of where the conversation is taking place. There are members of the Republican party nowadays who could consider people protesting in favor of universal healthcare to be lunatic and deranged communists, you know. Mostly because all those political ideas (mostly from the political left) are directly against the agenda a pursuits of insurance companies, many of them being big donors to the Republican party in times of elections.

So what being a "lunatic" actually means in TRUMP world? probably it means whatever Trumps needs it be mean for him to take political advantage and further divide the country, keeping chances high for him to retake his lost position in the white house.

See, one does not need to physically misbehave or threaten someone in order to be labeled as a lunatic, it is enough by having opposite ideas from those the leader of the cult/party has, quite simple.

Well you know... Trump speaking of lunatics brings some memories...


So, when he speaks of the army taking care of lunatics, it would be unwise to interpret that lunatics will be any other than those who he considers lunatics. As a clue, this guy above was among those classed as "good people" by Trump, so by mirroring the argument the lunatics are probably any other citizen that does not feel the need to attack the institutions of the US government.

Donald Trumps made it clear mentioning "Lunatics".
The actions of such persons as described is usually horrible and barbaric that could go out of the police controls.

Some electoral civil crisis usually requires military intentions not really to molest the people but due to their professions and militia influences, this lunatics with the intentions to rade the electoral background would fearfully back off from their destructive plans.

The police has a common relationship as understanding with the civil but meanwhile... Due to the police tolerances, most of these civilians turns bloody and horrible destabilizing the normalcy in the society.
So, let the military take that role of conducts.

Nothing new, more of a veja-vu if you ask me..

2020

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2020/12/19/trump-reportedly-asked-advisors-about-deploying-military-to-overturn-election/


Why would this be any different? How is it surprising that someone who thinks that he is above the founding fathers and the people why decided how the US would be governed for 200 years?

I believe however that the US army simply does not have the same values as in other countries in which the one with the gun is the one with the only say. Obviously, a soldier is like a guy with a hammer - the solution to everything is to hit with the hammer. But I do not think the army will intervene in politics as it is not "their problem".

Deploying military forces in one's own territory to serve as policing force is so political of authoritarian regimes, to the point it is concerning someone who USD to be president of the USA says this seriously.
As someone who lives in an authoritarian country, I must say it is not worth it to have military forces outside their barracks for the sake of security or ones nation, unless the country is going through exceptional times and there are exceptional threats going on, even in those cases the deployment of the military is supposed to be only temporary.

It is also a little bit ironic how much the Republican party brag on being the party of law and order, and yet the continue to directly belittle the police, the civil police, not the military one. Though, after the way Trump supporters treated police officers in the capitol back in January 6th any kind of verbal or physical mistreatment is not for us to be surprised.

If you are worried about the military taking over, consider what is being enacted now, before Trump takes office, by the Deep State and the Biden/Cabala regime.


DoD Permission To Use Lethal Force Against AMERICANS?

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bMda_62--M
Just in time for the election! A new Defense Department directive spells out the scenarios whereby the Defense Secretary can put US troops on US soil in situations where lethal force may be required. Also today: Biden rushes US troops into Israel's war on Lebanon...without Congress! Finally: Record low numbers are registering for Selective Service...we wonder why!
...

---

If Trump croaks, it won't be Vance or DeSantis who take over MAGA. It would have to be someone who is at least as much of a lunatic as Trump, like one of his sons, or MTG, or that sovcit guy who got arrested at his rally recently.

This guy is a moron. I don't wish ill on anyone but I think it would be quite good if he died soon and left way for young people in the party who are not lunatic pimps like him, like Vance or DeSantis.

"Trump said that “if really necessary” the military should be called for “some sick people, radical-left lunatics,” when asked about if he is expecting chaos on Election Day in an interview Sunday with Maria Bartiromo."
Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/13/trump-military-election-day-00183565

The military have one single role: to use full lethal force to destroy invaders. It shouldn't be allowed to use military as police, and it is in fact illegal to do.

Biden illegally used the military to guard the capital hill building, and because it was allowed Trump is following the way set by Biden. It was wrong when Biden did it and it would be wrong for Trump to do it too. The one right specific to a Republic is the right to access your representative in office, and Biden illegally blocked against that right... an impeachable offense. And yes, if Trump does this he will also be doing an impeachable offense.

The military can be rightfully used for nothing other than combating ARMED invasion. An unarmed invasion does not suffice. When military are used as police, that is a police military state, a war state, and a definite element of dictatorship. One could even consider such a military presence creation of a war zone. One has no obligation to stop at police road checkpoints, and even less obligation to stop at military road checkpoints.