Author

Topic: trusted address vs anonymous address (Read 739 times)

newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
September 19, 2011, 01:49:34 AM
#6
@nmat

well , i can't think of any 'checks/mechanism' now, so intentionally I leave that term vague
as of now :p

may be some form of web-of-trust or friend-of-friend concepts...
----

keeping ones wallet safe is simpler and fool proof,
asking for reversible tx seems to be lame... !

thanks guys.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
September 16, 2011, 07:35:04 AM
#5
Because if trusted-to-trusted transactions aren't also reversible, then all the scammers will just become trusted by operating legitimately at first. Sending 0.01 BTC (or .02, .03, maybe even up to .08) to a few people to build up trust, then stealing hundreds. Kind of like they already do!

This would change nothing.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
September 15, 2011, 10:36:22 PM
#4
What we need is a better way the secure our wallet.dat files.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 501
September 15, 2011, 05:56:01 PM
#3
So basically you want to make Bitcoin transactions reversible?

I just think you're mad you got scammed.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
September 15, 2011, 04:57:28 PM
#2
What do you mean by checks/mechanisms?
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
September 15, 2011, 04:17:58 PM
#1
nothing happens to a thief who steals bitcoin.

excuse my lame question...

why we don't have 'trusted' addresses & 'anonymous' ones...

so that 'anonymous' thief can never move BTC from 'trusted' addresses
to his 'anonymous' address..

--------
when the transactions is between: trusted -> anonymous

there can be checks/mechanism for 'trusted' address to revert
the transaction... within a day or so...

so that the real owner with 'trusted' address can have
some reaction time to realize the theft and reverse the tx.
Jump to: