His contribution is, at the very least, pointing out a small misconception that adds an insight to the chronological order of your case --that you send from your binance exchange wallet, a hot wallet, not from your non-custodial wallet-- and shows a possible error in your judgement --which you also acknowledge as per the post I quote above-- because "the guy" shows his innocence by giving you a screenshot of a watch-only wallet, a possible hint that he doesn't has an access to the wallet.
Adding Jawhead999 explanation to the equation, let's see if we get this correctly:
First, you create an non-custodial wallet via Trustwallet, with address 0x34799829Fa3d040B3D57E5c550d90681a7283117, and then you realized that the address --I'll refer it to "3117" from this point forward-- has already got multiple transfers prior to your creation date. Suspicious by this activities, you decide to create a new account, a completely new account which has no prior transaction like 3117 which you deemed fit, and which address is yet to be presented here. But then, you send 0.48bnb from your Binance Exchange account to 3117 and not the new wallet despite knowing that 3117 has quite a suspicious behavior. Why?
Second, for the case of AjidZronze, giving the benefits of doubt and as the consensus at this point --which, I stressed again, you're quite agree-- is that "the guy" is also a victim here and has no knowledge of the case or access to the wallet. Wouldn't it be quite unethical to reveal his identity, like social medias and phone number, for public consumption? Especially on crypto forum like this where annonimity is quite a valuable asset.
ajidzronze's is irrelevant, all informations posted here about him is available on the internet, a quick Google search brings out all his info. I posted this to make it easier, more transparent and serious for anyone who cares to do some research on the fraud I've identified, I have no other motive for this...Adding Jawhead999 explanation to the equation, let's see if we get this correctly:
First, you create an non-custodial wallet via Trustwallet, with address 0x34799829Fa3d040B3D57E5c550d90681a7283117, and then you realized that the address --I'll refer it to "3117" from this point forward-- has already got multiple transfers prior to your creation date. Suspicious by this activities, you decide to create a new account, a completely new account which has no prior transaction like 3117 which you deemed fit, and which address is yet to be presented here. But then, you send 0.48bnb from your Binance Exchange account to 3117 and not the new wallet despite knowing that 3117 has quite a suspicious behavior. Why?
Second, for the case of AjidZronze, giving the benefits of doubt and as the consensus at this point --which, I stressed again, you're quite agree-- is that "the guy" is also a victim here and has no knowledge of the case or access to the wallet. Wouldn't it be quite unethical to reveal his identity, like social medias and phone number, for public consumption? Especially on crypto forum like this where annonimity is quite a valuable asset.
There's a difference between information readily available on the internet and handing the information on a silver platter. What you did was the later. He's irrelevant, you've acknowledged that he's probably not at fault and is also a victim here, yet you put his name and details on the board that's specifically to inform people about scammers.
You argue that you --quoted and repeated here-- "post this to make it easier, more transparent and serious for anyone who cares to do some research on the fraud I've identified" and that you have no other motives for this. And you still refuse to mend the damage you did to him, by "exposing" him, by at least removing that part on your post, even after --I can't stressed this enough-- you acknowledged he might be a victim here. And you dare to say you have no other motive? You state on that very same sentence that I quote that you've identified the fraud. Who? Him? Because for anyone who skim through this thread, without properly reading it, that's the impression they'll get, thank's to your "readily available information". And all of this "identification" is done while you hide under an alt-account.
To the major issue at hand, what do you think went on Here.
What do I think went on here? Well, if I have to be blunt, there are three things happens here.
One, in case that "the guy" is really innocent here, then we have a serious case of defamation.
Two, a binance address that's aready used by someone, who happen to be also a whale and a thief who utilize the very wallet to stole money from unfortunate hands --emphasize on the plural form-- and you're somehow the first to report, although there should have been a lot of other victims out there... hmm... I don't know. Please help me, what exactly are you trying to insinuate here? That trustwallet stole money? That their dev is the thief? Because you've assure us that it is definitely not a malware or a keylogger or any hacking activity.
Three, your insinuation as described above aside, a salt to your wound, there is a case of carelessness. With your ability to "dig" the info of "the guy" and how you aware of the suspicious activity of wallet 3117, it will be justified to think that you're not a newbie to crypto --unlike what your account suggested-- you should have to know the rule of thumb to double and triple check your address prior to sending or receiving.
And you didn't do this.
Given you're sure there is no malware or keylogger involved in this story, this is the only explanation how you managed to accidentally sending your BNB from binance hot wallet to 3117. If we want to be all honest here, this case is 99.99% your fault.
