Txn fee back to 0.01 in rc5? | Bitcointalksearch.org

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 30, 2011, 12:24:58 AM

Quote from: bitlotto on May 29, 2011, 08:30:55 AM

BTW, Luke-Jr pool accepts transactions with lower fees...
I can't seem to figure it out though, I added "-addnode=173.242.112.53" when launching Bitcoin but it still forces the 0.01 fee. Must be too late at night for me.... Huh

git fetch git://gitorious.org/~Luke-Jr/bitcoin/luke-jr-bitcoin.git eligius_sendfee && git merge FETCH_HEAD

qurashee also built my branches (use at your own risk!): http://eligius.st/~qurashee/

qurashee

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Here's a patched binary for Windows http://ifile.it/6izp5uy Please do not abuse, setting a lower transaction fee is better than nothing.

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: bitlotto on May 29, 2011, 08:30:55 AM

BTW, Luke-Jr pool accepts transactions with lower fees...
I can't seem to figure it out though, I added "-addnode=173.242.112.53" when launching Bitcoin but it still forces the 0.01 fee. Must be too late at night for me.... Huh

git fetch git://gitorious.org/~Luke-Jr/bitcoin/luke-jr-bitcoin.git eligius_sendfee && git merge FETCH_HEAD

Maged

legendary

Activity: 1204

Merit: 1015

I hate to keep mentioning this, but the network is already ready for the new fee. Even when I sent a transaction that wasn't relayed by the old version, it still made it into a block. No tricks used. The only explanation I have for this is that we also changed the channels for IRC bootstrapping at the same time, meaning most RC users have at least one connection to another RC user.
http://blockexplorer.com/address/1ELvLsDRCaN8zSpZ8ZktAeM56tpfZ3E4kG

Sukrim

legendary

Activity: 2618

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Raulo on May 29, 2011, 03:31:18 PM

If you want to revert to 0.3.20 behavior, replace

Code:

 return dPriority > COIN * 144 / 250;

by

Code:

 return true;

in AllowFree of main.h and recompile.

Might be useful to offer a compiled version with that "patch" too...

Raulo

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on May 29, 2011, 12:12:38 AM

The fact that the transaction fee is forced annoys me. I am still using 0.3.20 because of that fact.

You are free to do what you want in your client. The 0.3.21/22 version is much more newbie friendly because the transaction is going to be delayed unless they pay a fee. As an advanced user, you are free to change your client. If you want to revert to 0.3.20 behavior, replace

Code:

 return dPriority > COIN * 144 / 250;

by

Code:

 return true;

in AllowFree of main.h and recompile.

ShadowOfHarbringer

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1006

Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952

Quote from: Luke-Jr on May 29, 2011, 08:13:40 AM

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on May 29, 2011, 12:12:38 AM

If i want to wait for 10 hours for the 1st confirmation, why not let me ?

Don't assume it will necessarily get accepted ever...

Still, that is my choice to make.

theymos

administrator

Activity: 5222

Merit: 13032

Quote from: bitlotto on May 29, 2011, 08:30:55 AM

BTW, Luke-Jr pool accepts transactions with lower fees...
I can't seem to figure it out though, I added "-addnode=173.242.112.53" when launching Bitcoin but it still forces the 0.01 fee. Must be too late at night for me.... Huh

Your client doesn't negotiate fees in any way with your peers, so it doesn't know that Luke-Jr requires lower fees. You have to modify your client (or use an old version) to take advantage of the lower fees.

Luke-Jr also rejects all totally free transactions, I believe.

bitlotto

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

BitLotto - best odds + best payouts + cheat-proof

BTW, Luke-Jr pool accepts transactions with lower fees...
I can't seem to figure it out though, I added "-addnode=173.242.112.53" when launching Bitcoin but it still forces the 0.01 fee. Must be too late at night for me.... Huh

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on May 29, 2011, 12:12:38 AM

The fact that the transaction fee is forced annoys me. I am still using 0.3.20 because of that fact.

Hasn't it always been forced? It seems the correct solution is to include a "Optional fee" in the send dialog, and if it's too small, display a confirmation ("... Do you want to send it this way anyway? Yes/No") if it's "too low". But nobody's submitted a patch for that afaik. Wink

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on May 29, 2011, 12:12:38 AM

If i want to wait for 10 hours for the 1st confirmation, why not let me ?

Don't assume it will necessarily get accepted ever...

theymos

administrator

Activity: 5222

Merit: 13032

Quote from: wumpus on May 29, 2011, 01:06:01 AM

You can set the fee in the options or is that something else?

That can only increase fees from the default, not decrease them.

Once transaction replacement is possible, Bitcoin will hardly even have to worry about this. People will use trial and error to find the correct fees.

wumpus

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1022

No Maps for These Territories

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on May 29, 2011, 12:12:38 AM

Not leaving the choice to the user is so not libertarian.

You can set the fee in the options or is that something else?

ShadowOfHarbringer

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1006

Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952

Quote from: xf2_org on May 28, 2011, 09:15:20 PM

Quote from: Sukrim on May 28, 2011, 08:43:15 PM

When is "phase 2" expected to happen?

As soon as possible -- the very next bitcoin release.

BTW.
The fact that the transaction fee is forced annoys me. I am still using 0.3.20 because of that fact.

Wouldn't it be wiser to leave the final decision to the user and allow sending a transaction without fees after one more "Are you sure ?" dialog option (or "force" rpc/cmdline command) ?
If i want to wait for 10 hours for the 1st confirmation, why not let me ?

Not leaving the choice to the user is so not libertarian.

xf2_org

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 13

Quote from: Sukrim on May 28, 2011, 08:43:15 PM

When is "phase 2" expected to happen?

As soon as possible -- the very next bitcoin release.

Sukrim

legendary

Activity: 2618

Merit: 1007

When is "phase 2" expected to happen?

error

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

Quote from: DareC on May 28, 2011, 07:34:44 PM

I just upgraded from 0.3.22-rc2 to -rc5. I liked the considerably lower fee in rc2, but this seems to have been reverted or regressed. Even with txn fee manually set to 0.0005, I get asked to pay the old fee of 0.01. Is this expected behaviour or a bug?

It's expected behavior. The tx fee change is being rolled out in two phases, as was discussed in the thread about it.

DareC

member

Activity: 83

Merit: 10

I just upgraded from 0.3.22-rc2 to -rc5. I liked the considerably lower fee in rc2, but this seems to have been reverted or regressed. Even with txn fee manually set to 0.0005, I get asked to pay the old fee of 0.01. Is this expected behaviour or a bug?

Topic: Txn fee back to 0.01 in rc5? (Read 2521 times)