Mr Bailey rejected bitcoin’s description as a currency, stressing it is a commodity — which the FCA does not regulate.
Well, the end justifies the means in this case. It's irrelevant what he defines it as or how he treats it as long as it ends up with the best outcome for BTC users in general.
Regulation could be a huge nuisance, especially for the casual users.
“If I thought there was evidence of people saying: ‘You know what I’m going to put my pension into? bitcoin!’ I’d be very concerned, but we don’t see that at the moment.”
With this, he's seeing it as far too black and white. If this sort of speculation occurs, it will happen very gradually, and I doubt they'll be any clear point to pin down at which you cross the line.