strike played this game once before.. in el salvador....... didnt work out well
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/09/29/strike-ceo-el-salvadors-bitcoin-experience-doesnt-hurt-my-company-at-all/
in short. el salvador dropped strike. due to LN issue
el salvador tried a few things and found LN not to be the solution to the back-end of their chivo wallet. and instead went with a CEX custodian model for citizens funds back-end of the wallet
hope they learned their lessons and are not just repeating the same game
the chivo wallet claim of bitcoin was actually not users getting/having a bitcoin address of $XX btc locked and funded to them on keys of their users of the chivo wallet.
they got to claim some LN-msat inbound balance from a strike hub channel(using LN temp ID not funded utxo ID for each chivo user) which users had to try to request routes out of the hubs channel to a payment service to close channel to or convert to btc with that end payee.
but there was a bottleneck of liquidity. there were not enough end points to be able to convert/claim their "free money" due to a LN liquidity issue.
it was not a bitcoin problem it was a LN problem of lack of liquidity
strike was hoping there would be enough remitters moving value into LN to offset the LN liquidity trying to move out of hub channels.
in the end the el salv government just went with a CEX exchange as the account management and stopped the LN game