Author

Topic: US Gov may mint a 1 Trillion dollar coin out of thin air - Hiperinflation? (Read 4520 times)

legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
The coin isn't going to increase the money supply though, as it will never get spent. It's like writing yourself a slip saying "This slip is worth $1000000000000" so you remain solvent. I don't see how inflation can result from this. If anything, it will decrease inflation in the long run as the Fed's powers dwindle.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
I think the $1 Trillion coin is more of a bargaining chip at this point. Or, perhaps more accurately, a threat. "Work with me or I swear to God I'll mint this coin!"

I think it's more desperation, they're basically running out of ideas, I'm looking forward to this year for sure, there will be only one thing they can do soon enough.
I think the coin is more of an intervention in a suicide attempt by a Congress with a 9% approval rating. I say let them jump.
Huh? I thought the coin is a suicide threat. Kind of like:

I think the $1 Trillion coin is more of a bargaining chip at this point. Or, perhaps more accurately, a threat. "Work with me or I swear to God I'll mint this coin!"

Or: "Hey Russians/Germans/whoever, you know how we owe you a ton of goods and services for those paper dollars you've saved over the years? Well if you don't do what we tell you to do, we'll commit economic suicide by triggering domestic hyperinflation, and then we won't owe you anything because your dollars will be worthless bahahahahaha!"

Institutional psychosis.

Kinda like "Hey World, the Euro means a bunch of smaller countries can play the same currency manipulation games as the big countries." In fact, all central bank backed currencies play these games without frontiers.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
I dont think they would ever do this, but if they do it will be great for BITCOIN!
kgo
hero member
Activity: 548
Merit: 500
No one seems to recall that LIBERTARIAN Bill Still has been recommending this same course of action for years (though with Trillions of regular coinage), and even says we should pay off the National Debt with it.  He points out that Lincoln did exactly the same thing to pay for the Civil War.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73vkHOPNZ8k&feature=channel_video_title



Bill Still is fine with fiat currency, but wants it to be controlled by the government instead of private banks, and wants to get rid of fractional reserve lending.  He thinks that the ability of the banks to expand then contract the money supply at will causes economic problems. He wants to start off with a fixed amount of money, and then have the supply grow annually with a predictable rate determined by the population growth.

He does not want to randomly print money so the government can spend whatever it wants.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
I think the $1 Trillion coin is more of a bargaining chip at this point. Or, perhaps more accurately, a threat. "Work with me or I swear to God I'll mint this coin!"

I think it's more desperation, they're basically running out of ideas, I'm looking forward to this year for sure, there will be only one thing they can do soon enough.
I think the coin is more of an intervention in a suicide attempt by a Congress with a 9% approval rating. I say let them jump.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
I think the $1 Trillion coin is more of a bargaining chip at this point. Or, perhaps more accurately, a threat. "Work with me or I swear to God I'll mint this coin!"

I think it's more desperation, they're basically running out of ideas, I'm looking forward to this year for sure, there will be only one thing they can do soon enough.
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 504
WorkAsPro
How is this soup scale going now it's 2013, can the new image include the missing decade data point as well.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
Nothing new here, it's the same as the trillions that have been printed in the last 5 years.. QE stuff with a disguise.. They changed the "Pr" for a "M"  Printing / Minting

And about hyperinflation, since 2010 I'm sad for those pilling cash for their old days, if those old days are in 10 years or more, they will regret.  

This campbell soup can price chart shows only a part of the effect of printing x trillion more dollars in the last 5 years...

IMO, the inflation caused by the printing of so much cash has just start to kick in !  

Watch out for a can of soup priced at 2+$ within few/several years.. No 401k plan can beat this, if there still money in those 401k (I think they replaced the money by an IOU note few years ago).



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=112269.0;all



A can of soup is already $2 in Australia.
legendary
Activity: 1264
Merit: 1008
Imho this is a bluff to test the response. Everything so far has considered the effects of this within the US but it's biggest effect would be on the countries holding US debt, by doing this the US is effectively reducing that dollar valued debt by 10% and I don't expect they will be happy about that. I'd guess there are some heated discussions in diplomatic circles atm.


Could be a bluff you're right.  It could also represent a behind the scenes power battle. 

Remember creating money from nothing is not a new idea, indeed every dollar on the planet was created that way.  1T$ created from nothing is not in any way new.  The new thing here is that members of the United States corporation are trying to have the power to issue this new money through some kind of "commemorative coin" loophole.  For the last 100 years it appears that this power has been closely guarded by a private group of banks commonly referred to the as "The Fed", whatever the fuck that means.  They don't need to make commemorative coinage to issue this money but simply add zeros to accounts on certain ledgers. 

If congress tries to go through with this, one would expect some heads to roll.  However we can be sure there is a lot more going on behind the scenes that we have no clue about, so discussion here is of little or no value if we don't know the players involved, their bullshit fraternities, or their psychotic incentives.

   
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
No one seems to recall that LIBERTARIAN Bill Still has been recommending this same course of action for years (though with Trillions of regular coinage), and even says we should pay off the National Debt with it.  He points out that Lincoln did exactly the same thing to pay for the Civil War.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73vkHOPNZ8k&feature=channel_video_title

legendary
Activity: 1264
Merit: 1008
Um guys the fed has "printed" ~$2T out of thin air in the last five years (Fed's balance sheet increased from ~$800B to $2.9T).  If we include the Fed's off balance sheet (magical money they print out of nowhere and lend to foreign central banks so for some reason it doesn't count on the "official" books) it is closer to a ~$4T expansion.
The USD monetary base went from less than 1T$ to 3T$ or I misunderstood what you wrote? Why the prices didn't bumped 3 times?

Because inflation can take generations to trickle down. 


member
Activity: 112
Merit: 16
I think the $1 Trillion coin is more of a bargaining chip at this point. Or, perhaps more accurately, a threat. "Work with me or I swear to God I'll mint this coin!"
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
That might actually solve everything, platinum out of thin air would be a neat trick.

But seriously this is nothing new whatsoever. They've been saying that a pile of paper/db entries is worth trillions of dollars for a very long time.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Annuit cœptis humanae libertas
And that series of Zim$ (third Zimbabwean dollar, ZWR) was issued in denominations up to 100 trillion dollars! Where 1 ZWR = 1 septillion ZWD? Shocked
hero member
Activity: 557
Merit: 500
In about 10 years, we'll all have those coins.  Three will probably get you a BigMac.  Remember, these were out not very long ago....




kjj
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026
The truth is that these guys aren't idiots.  They know exactly what they are doing.  There was a crash coming, and they are trying to make it as soft of a crash as possible.  And the rest of the world is helping.  There is no panic dollar dumping, as bad as it is, because everything that you could dump your dollars for is worse.

Gold? Silver? Other precious metals or resources? BTC? Smiley

(paper)Gold and (paper)Silver are even worse than dollars.  You want physical, but you want to pay paper prices for it, or your books won't come out right.  Good luck doing that in enough volume for people to notice.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Annuit cœptis humanae libertas
The truth is that these guys aren't idiots.  They know exactly what they are doing.  There was a crash coming, and they are trying to make it as soft of a crash as possible.  And the rest of the world is helping.  There is no panic dollar dumping, as bad as it is, because everything that you could dump your dollars for is worse.

Gold? Silver? Other precious metals or resources? BTC? Smiley
kjj
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026
If the trillion dollar coin had come out as a surprise, it might have caused a bit of a panic.  Not that I think it even remotely likely to happen, but you know, if.

On the other hand, now that the story has made the rounds, everyone knows that raising the debt limit and striking the coin are effectively the same thing.  At worst, we'd all give a chuckle at them replacing one silly gimmick with another while the blogs that have been predicting armageddon since 1972 will continue to do so either way.

The truth is that these guys aren't idiots.  They know exactly what they are doing.  There was a crash coming, and they are trying to make it as soft of a crash as possible.  And the rest of the world is helping.  There is no panic dollar dumping, as bad as it is, because everything that you could dump your dollars for is worse.
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
I'd like to see them do that. The dollar would certainly collapse. It won't happen, though. The debt ceiling will be raised.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
This has been thrown around for a while now.  Basically it's just a way to circumvent the stupid debt ceiling, which is irrelevant since the US has raised the debt ceiling something like 76 times already and will do so again.  This is not hyperinflation, maybe if they were printing thousands of these coins like Zimbabwe but they're not.
kgo
hero member
Activity: 548
Merit: 500
The debt ceiling will be raised, and we will create a bunch of bonds that the Fed will pay for by creating money out of thin air.  The only difference in practice between the trillion dollar coin and raising the debt ceiling is that with the coin the government gets the money interest free.
legendary
Activity: 1002
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin
To use an analogy imagine if people are cold so the FED solution is to soak them with gasoline.  They still aren't warm so the  FED keeps dumping more and more and more gasoline.  Weeks, months go by and nope people aren't warm yet so the gasoline soaking continues, entire neighborhoods soaked with gasoline, businesses soaked with gasoline.  Tanker trucks of gasoline are brought in and 24/7 spraying of gasoline everywhere continues.   When the people complain "hey we are still cold", Ben Bernake's answer is "eventually there will be a spark and everyone will be warm".

+1

That's very true, quite a good analogy Smiley

Sad but soooo true !
legendary
Activity: 1002
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin
Nothing new here, it's the same as the trillions that have been printed in the last 5 years.. QE stuff with a disguise.. They changed the "Pr" for a "M"  Printing / Minting

And about hyperinflation, since 2010 I'm sad for those pilling cash for their old days, if those old days are in 10 years or more, they will regret.  

This campbell soup can price chart shows only a part of the effect of printing x trillion more dollars in the last 5 years...

IMO, the inflation caused by the printing of so much cash has just start to kick in !  

Watch out for a can of soup priced at 2+$ within few/several years.. No 401k plan can beat this, if there still money in those 401k (I think they replaced the money by an IOU note few years ago).



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=112269.0;all

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1029
Hah wow! now try making change for that!
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Somnium
So can we steal the coin lol  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 247
Merit: 250
Quote
Would it be bad for the economy? Wouldn't it cause inflation?

No: the trillion-dollar coin won't increase the money supply any more than raising the debt ceiling would.
Um.......



Based on M2, dumping $1T into the money supply would make every dollar worth ~10% less?  And the author just said it wouldn't cause inflation?  1% may be small enough to argue it's negligible, but 10% is a pretty hefty tax increase especially considering it mostly affects the poor/middle class since a majority of their wealth is in cash instead of stocks/real estate.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
In cryptography we trust
To use an analogy imagine if people are cold so the FED solution is to soak them with gasoline.  They still aren't warm so the  FED keeps dumping more and more and more gasoline.  Weeks, months go by and nope people aren't warm yet so the gasoline soaking continues, entire neighborhoods soaked with gasoline, businesses soaked with gasoline.  Tanker trucks of gasoline are brought in and 24/7 spraying of gasoline everywhere continues.   When the people complain "hey we are still cold", Ben Bernake's answer is "eventually there will be a spark and everyone will be warm".

 Smiley

Your analogy would amuse me if it weren't so true.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
Um guys the fed has "printed" ~$2T out of thin air in the last five years (Fed's balance sheet increased from ~$800B to $2.9T).  If we include the Fed's off balance sheet (magical money they print out of nowhere and lend to foreign central banks so for some reason it doesn't count on the "official" books) it is closer to a ~$4T expansion.

Now the stupid ~$1T coin will never be made but not for the reason the Senator thinks.   The FED isn't in the business of giving away money.  The FED LOANS money.  If the FED produced a ~$1T coin and loaned it to the treasury it would be no different than the Fed buying $1T in govt bonds.   Either way it is a loan = debt = included in the debt ceiling.   Hell if the FED just wanted to give away money well they could simply buy some government debt and "vanish it".  Tada govt has $1T, $2T, $10T, $15T less debt.  It's magic.  No need for stupid coins to do that.
Where did you get that the FED would mint the coin?

DOH.  Too early and not enough coffee.  The first part is still applicable though.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
Um guys the fed has "printed" ~$2T out of thin air in the last five years (Fed's balance sheet increased from ~$800B to $2.9T).  If we include the Fed's off balance sheet (magical money they print out of nowhere and lend to foreign central banks so for some reason it doesn't count on the "official" books) it is closer to a ~$4T expansion.
The USD monetary base went from less than 1T$ to 3T$ or I misunderstood what you wrote? Why the prices didn't bumped 3 times?

Because at the same time velocity fall off a cliff.  Monetary velocity is (simple version) how many times a single unit of currency is exchanged annually.  So if customer pays your employer $100, and your employer pays you $100, and you pay the grocery store $100 and the grocery store pays a farmer $100 even though it is the same "$100" you have a velocity of 4.  The effective money supply is roughly 4x higher.  So while the FED is rapidly expanding the monetary base the velocity is also falling.  Kinda like trying to fill the bathtub with the drain open.

As someone above pointed out the FED isn't actually putting money into the hands of the people.  It is putting money in the hands of the banks, who in theory should lend it out and increase the effective money supply however due to the FED other actions it is very profitable for the banks to simply borrow money from the FED use it to buy govt debt and mortgage backed securities.  Kinda hard to not make money if you can borrow a (nearly) unlimited amount at ~0% and collect interest at 2% to 4%.  Smiley  Ironically simply having a free "lottery" where the winner gets $x dollars on a VISA gift card which must be spent within 365 days would be far more effective then handing ever increasing quantities of money to the banks to do "nothing" with it.


So money supply has exploded but no price inflation because the money is being circulated less.  However if the economy did finally pick up and velocity jumped to normal rates before the FED could soak up that excess money supply you would see massive inflation.  Probably not hyperinflation but price inflation in the high teens like the early 80s are certainly possible.



To use an analogy imagine if people are cold so the FED solution is to soak them with gasoline.  They still aren't warm so the  FED keeps dumping more and more and more gasoline.  Weeks, months go by and nope people aren't warm yet so the gasoline soaking continues, entire neighborhoods soaked with gasoline, businesses soaked with gasoline.  Tanker trucks of gasoline are brought in and 24/7 spraying of gasoline everywhere continues.   When the people complain "hey we are still cold", Ben Bernake's answer is "eventually there will be a spark and everyone will be warm".
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
The USD monetary base went from less than 1T$ to 3T$ or I misunderstood what you wrote? Why the prices didn't bumped 3 times?

Yes, and for the second question: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/EXCRESNS

Mostly because banks are holding most of the extra money as excess reserves. Also, prices are not such a direct/immediate linear function of money supply, although they're strongly related.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
hahaha, Krugman makes fun of himself alone, we don't need to say anything. I don't know which is worse, this or the alien invasion to boost the economy thing.
The sad part is seeing people still taking this moron seriously.

Hell if the FED just wanted to give away money well they could simply buy some government debt and "vanish it". 

As a matter of fact, that's kind of how it works out:  https://mises.org/daily/4029
Quote
... after the Fed pays its employees, pays its electric bill, and throws the staff Christmas party, it remits the excess earnings back to the Treasury
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Um guys the fed has "printed" ~$2T out of thin air in the last five years (Fed's balance sheet increased from ~$800B to $2.9T).  If we include the Fed's off balance sheet (magical money they print out of nowhere and lend to foreign central banks so for some reason it doesn't count on the "official" books) it is closer to a ~$4T expansion.
The USD monetary base went from less than 1T$ to 3T$ or I misunderstood what you wrote? Why the prices didn't bumped 3 times?
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
Um guys the fed has "printed" ~$2T out of thin air in the last five years (Fed's balance sheet increased from ~$800B to $2.9T).  If we include the Fed's off balance sheet (magical money they print out of nowhere and lend to foreign central banks so for some reason it doesn't count on the "official" books) it is closer to a ~$4T expansion.

Now the stupid ~$1T coin will never be made but not for the reason the Senator thinks.   The FED isn't in the business of giving away money.  The FED LOANS money.  If the FED produced a ~$1T coin and loaned it to the treasury it would be no different than the Fed buying $1T in govt bonds.   Either way it is a loan = debt = included in the debt ceiling.   Hell if the FED just wanted to give away money well they could simply buy some government debt and "vanish it".  Tada govt has $1T, $2T, $10T, $15T less debt.  It's magic.  No need for stupid coins to do that.
Where did you get that the FED would mint the coin?
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
Um guys the fed has "printed" ~$2T out of thin air in the last five years (Fed's balance sheet increased from ~$800B to $2.9T).  If we include the Fed's off balance sheet (magical money they print out of nowhere and lend to foreign central banks so for some reason it doesn't count on the "official" books) it is closer to a ~$4T expansion.

This is the part where D&T fails reading comprehension. 

Now the stupid ~$1T coin will never be made but not for the reason the Senator thinks.   The FED isn't in the business of giving away money.  The FED LOANS money.  If the FED produced a ~$1T coin and loaned it to the treasury it would be no different than the Fed buying $1T in govt bonds.   Either way it is a loan = debt = included in the debt ceiling.   Hell if the FED just wanted to give away money well they could simply buy some government debt and "vanish it".  Tada govt has $1T, $2T, $10T, $15T less debt.  It's magic.  No need for stupid coins to do that.
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
The world would loose confidence in the Dollar. Even non economics interested Americans would consider this cheating.

It won't decrease US debt as the debt is to be paied in foreign currencies I presume.

So he won't do it. This is just stupidity.
I hope he mints 16 of these coins to pay back the Treasury notes. This would be a boss move like Andrew Jackson. We could then re-issue new money and restart American manufacturing without needing our lame Congress to pass protectionist laws. They can continue sitting on their arses.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Quote
Would it be bad for the economy? Wouldn't it cause inflation?

No: the trillion-dollar coin won't increase the money supply any more than raising the debt ceiling would.
Um.......

I laughed. The article contradicts itself right here:

Quote
How does it work?

Well, like any other coin, basically? The Treasury prints it and deposits it in the Federal Reserve, and then, boom: the U.S. government has a bank account with a trillion dollars with which it can pay its bills. For a more technical explanation, involving the word "seigniorage," here's the Corrente post from last year that first proposed the idea.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
Quote
Would it be bad for the economy? Wouldn't it cause inflation?

No: the trillion-dollar coin won't increase the money supply any more than raising the debt ceiling would.
Um.......
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
The world would loose confidence in the Dollar. Even non economics interested Americans would consider this cheating.

It won't decrease US debt as the debt is to be paied in foreign currencies I presume.

So he won't do it. This is just stupidity.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
This recently hit the news. And while I'm no US citizen I'm very interested in this story as it may affect the euro as well and the overall credibility of fiat money itself.

In order to raise the debt ceiling and avoid passing through congress, US president Barack Obama may aprove the mintage of a new 1.000.000.000.000 coin (1 trillion). The coin would be backed by fiat money and it would be basically the same than printing 1 trillion new dollar bills.

Here's the full story with a friendly FAQ on Gaweker... although with a positive spin I don't agree with:
http://gawker.com/5973717/your-guide-to-the-trillion+dollar-platinum-coin-that-obama-can-mint-to-save-the-world

What do you think?
What would the effects be on the dollar? And on the euro?
Jump to: