Author

Topic: US Justice Dept trying to recover funds from two hacked exchanges (Read 136 times)

legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1483
Would the US Justice Department be doing the same to try and recover stolen bitcoins if the alleged perpetrators weren't North Korean state-funded hackers?

probably not, although the DOJ did go after BTC-E and alexander vinnik pretty damn hard. they just didn't manage to seize any of the money until years later. this bank seizure a couple months ago shows they are still trying, 3-4 years after BTC-E was indicted!

NZ police seize $140m from Russian 'computer genius' Alexander Vinnik
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 4002
The good thing is that currencies can be tracked even if hackers try to hide them, and therefore there is no indication for those who want to link BTC to dark activities.
If the judiciary can track the currencies and reach people, it will not be difficult for them to confiscate the money.
Also, people who buy coins from these hackers can prove that they bought them from legal sources and then they will not be confiscated.
The story relates to hackers and the resources available in tracking.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1722
Would the US Justice Department be doing the same to try and recover stolen bitcoins if the alleged perpetrators weren't North Korean state-funded hackers?
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1483
All in all, the Justice department is looking to forfeit 280 accounts but how do they know those accounts belongs to the NK hackers or the Chinese launderers?

it's probably due to a distinct, repeating pattern involving the same actors. chainalysis has blogged before about a niche in the chinese OTC markets for brokers that specifically cater to money launderers.

the justice department still technically needs to prove their case:

Quote
The claims made in this complaint are only allegations and do not constitute a determination of liability.  The burden to prove forfeitability in a civil forfeiture proceeding is upon the government.
sr. member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 413
Quote
The forfeiture complaint filed today details two related hacks of virtual currency exchanges.

As alleged in the complaint, in July 2019, a virtual currency exchange was hacked by an actor tied to North Korea.  The hacker allegedly stole over $272,000 worth of alternative cryptocurrencies and tokens, including Proton Tokens, PlayGame tokens, and IHT Real Estate Protocol tokens.  Over the subsequent months, the funds were laundered through several intermediary addresses and other virtual currency exchanges.  In many instances, the actor converted the cryptocurrency into BTC, Tether, or other forms of cryptocurrency – a process known as “chain hopping” – in order to obfuscate the transaction path.  As detailed in the pleadings, law enforcement was nonetheless able to trace the funds, despite the sophisticated laundering techniques used.

As also alleged in the pleadings, in September 2019, a U.S.-based company was hacked in a related incident.  The North Korea-associated hacker gained access to the company’s virtual currency wallets, funds held by the company on other platforms, and funds held by the company’s partners.  The hacker stole nearly $2.5 million and laundered it through over 100 accounts at another virtual currency exchange.

The funds from both of the above hacks, as well as hacks previously detailed in a March 2020 forfeiture action (1:20-cv-00606-TJK), were all allegedly laundered by the same group of Chinese OTC actors.  The infrastructure and communication accounts used to further the intrusions and fund transfers were also tied to North Korea.
- https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-complaint-forfeit-280-cryptocurrency-accounts-tied-hacks-two-exchanges

All in all, the Justice department is looking to forfeit 280 accounts but how do they know those accounts belongs to the NK hackers or the Chinese launderers?

What if hackers sold the tokens identified in the report and other altcoins to Chinese brokers who subsequently sold to unsuspecting traders who also deposited them to their KYC verified exchange accounts or custodial wallets?

Jump to: