Suspect, perhaps. But it is understandable that there will be many knowledgeable people who will not understand that it was an inside job.
A good portion of the people who or are or were military personnel have been indoctrinated (brainwashed) into thinking that the U.S. can do no substantial wrong. They have to be this way because, they were and are part of the U.S, and to think that the U.S. does something substantially bad or wrong is like saying admitting that THEY are doing something substantially bad or wrong. Nobody who is a relatively honest person likes to think that he is bad or wrong.
In Spendy's case, the fact that he is a thinking person, and the fact that he won't accept the idea of an inside job, and the fact that he is so adamantly opposed vocally to the inside job idea, and the fact that he is opposed to the idea without really having anything to back up the things he says when strong evidence is dumped right into his lap so to speak, DOES make him a prime suspect candidate.
Personally, I still want to give him the benefit of the doubt. But, it is because of my nature that wants to believe the best in others that I so think. The more Spendy talks, however, the more I am coming to believe that I have been duped grandly into thinking that he has good will and good faith about this whole 9/11 thing.
BD, it was just a friendly jab at Spendy. The adage "where there is smoke there is fire" comes to mind with 9/11, there is so much smoke around the subject that I find it hard how anybody can be so certain at this point. James Corbett does an excellent job of clearing some of that smoke screen, illustrating many of the inconvenient coincidences. For me the most interesting of all is the concerted effort that has been made by authorities to close the the book on it. That in itself tells you there was more going on then they want you to know.
"Friendly jab."
This is a forum. As such, we talk about all kinds of things. But there might come a point in time where we start to wonder a little.