US terrorists strike again | Bitcointalksearch.org

kokjo

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

You are WRONG!

Quote from: antibanker on April 12, 2013, 04:13:53 AM

this fuqa is a jew, no?

yeah sure he is.

Quote

A representative of Reporters Without Borders called the newly announced network “another step of the state to control information.”

Quote

journalists had revealed that coverage of sensitive issues in Russia is allowed, but direct criticism of Vladimir Putin or then President Dmitry Medvedev is not.

Quote

Former KGB officer Konstantin Preobrazhensky criticized RT as "a part of the Russian industry of misinformation and manipulation".

they are all jew scum, i see it clearly now.

antibanker

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

err, lemme guess:

Russian studies professor Stephen F. Cohen stated in 2012 that RT does a lot of stories that “reflect badly” on the United States and that they are “particularly aggrieved by American sermonizing abroad.

this fuqa is a jew, no?

kokjo

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

You are WRONG!

Quote from: antibanker on April 11, 2013, 02:36:04 PM

rt.com for sure

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)#Objectivity_and_bias

you are just shooting yourself more and more in your feet.

antibanker

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

rt.com for sure

Mike Christ

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1003

Source please.

antibanker

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

document leaks reveal tactics of the American terrorists, aka "Great Satan USA":

CIA drone strikes:

Furthermore, in some cases it is difficult to confirm that the targets were militants at all.

In the strikes above, the internal reports showed that only one civilian had been killed. But the modus operandi revealed behind the strikes, shows that some of the attacks seem to have been based on the certain people or visitors being present as certain locations, or merely associating with those the US believes were terrorists. This chimes with the accusation that the US is carrying out a policy of “signature strikes” – attacks based on behavior, or “signature” that would be expected of a terrorist, rather than any specific illegal activity.

These “signatures” apparently include such suspicious behavior as taking part in a funeral procession or first responding to an initial drone strike. Last year, the United Nation’s special rapporteur on human rights and counter-terrorism, Ben Emmerson, said it’s believed that, “since President Obama took office, at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims and more than 20 civilians have also been attacked in deliberate strikes on funerals and mourners.”

The US has previously refused to admit that it operates such a policy.

Topic: US terrorists strike again (Read 734 times)