Topic: USA and UK military complex estimations and future outlook and predictions (Read 58 times)

Okay this is Royally Messed up. Like who would want to be a president of such country with a Stat like this.
The Presidency mortality rate is as high as the military on an average.


Technological advancements hasn't removed the notion that the side with the biggest arms is the strongest
Instead it has diversified and made it more efficient  dangerous.

It's a clear message to all better obey now or cry later.
World is out of order like bush said need order and law and obey.
They don't stop even when all world in fire they still will produce guns and burn those who don't obey.

Nothing changed everything is just the way how it is.
and by looking those numbers and predictions it's all scary really like very scare how much weapons produced off they will use them and that's not looking good.
I don't think our world leaders are normal in heads something got be wrong.

Even the nuclear war don't stop uk and usa to produce weapons so they have well prepared.
both the USA and UK have established military production complexes capable of operating under extreme conditions, including potential nuclear warfare scenarios. Their investment in underground facilities enhances their resilience against such threats, allowing them to continue producing weapons if necessary.
Yes, the USA and UK can produce weapons even underground during a nuclear war due to their resilient military production complexes

And after that whoever dared to mess with them will be made as example for everybody on the world.


So you can not win usa lol 😂 you can only make more angry and after you will get hit hardest
United States: The U.S. has numerous underground facilities, such as the Cheyenne Mountain Complex in Colorado, which is designed to protect critical military operations from nuclear attacks. Additionally, many defense contractors have secure production sites that can operate under adverse conditions.

United Kingdom: The UK also maintains secure facilities for its military production. While specific details about all underground sites are often classified, it is known that some key installations are designed to be resilient against nuclear threats.

These underground facilities can provide a level of continuity for military production even during extreme scenarios like a nuclear war.

So they got no plans to stop any wars and they got no fear of anyone neither china or russia they are ready If world is nuked they still got underground military bases they prepare and will attack back hardest i guess so uk and usa got no fear that's why they don't listen any Putin oreshnik or attacking against west because they are ready for anything.

I see big plans to make profit and money and they allready making a lot money
My only question is what will they do all this money when nature is destroyed world is bombed and thanks to this many other problems can they really enjoy life still? I don't think so they can enjoy to enjoy life and live fullest good nice life spreading the love and happiness not their goals.
Also i see hypocratic view here how the hell the UK and USA see themselfes as "peacful diplomatic Nations" lol ....second question i see a lot military prepared productions plans and mostly i see here by this info attracting equipment sales instead of defence, my another question will be ....world preparing for WAR like brazil India ....my question against who Aliens from the another planets ? Becouse If USA and UK see themselfes as peacful countries then against who the brics Nations Will be fighting ...lol 😁

I wish you had included the source for all these raw data that you provided here so it can be better analyzed.

But generally it looks correct, war has turned into a good business for some regimes which is why US regime has been starting wars everywhere for the past couple of decades. All these arms dealers you named here have infiltrated the US government and control the policies in a way that would fill their pockets the most.

It is no wonder that their biggest customers are the most corrupt countries as well including many of the dictatorships like Saudi usurped Arabia, UAE, etc. Even South Korea is one of the most corrupt countries that their recent mess when their corrupt president issued a martial law led me to look into their past and it was surprising:

What is interesting is that regardless of the fact that their military products are extremely expensive and in some cases completely useless for modern warfare, these corrupt regimes still continue to purchase them...

this what is public info from all sources so we got picture what they outlook is for the wars business.

Military Complex Production Companies in the UK and USA: Sales Satisfaction and Future Projections (2024-2030)

As of late 2023, military production companies in both the UK and USA have reported a generally positive outlook regarding their sales performance.

Companies:
Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, BAE Systems, and Raytheon Technologies.

Looking ahead to 2024-2030, analysts predict continued growth in military equipment spending globally.
According to various reports from defense market research firms, the global military expenditure is expected to reach approximately 2 trillion $ by 2030.


Emerging War Zones and New Buyers:

Several countries are anticipated to become significant buyers of military equipment from the UK and USA between 2024-2030:
Eastern Europe: Countries like Poland and the Baltic states are expected to continue ramping up their military capabilities

Asia-Pacific Region: Nations such as India, Japan, South Korea, and Australia are likely to enhance their defense procurements amid regional tensions with China.

Middle East: Countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE will continue investing heavily in advanced military systems as they modernize their armed forces.

These regions represent potential new markets where W USA and UK companies can expand their sales significantly.

Estimated Earnings and Financial Goals

The earnings of major defense contractors have been substantial over recent years:
For instance, Lockheed Martin reported revenues of approximately $67 billion in 2022 with expectations for continued growth.
BAE Systems also showed strong financial performance with revenues around £22 billion ($29 billion) in 2022.
Analysts estimate that these companies could see annual growth rates of around 3% to 5% through 2030 based on current contracts and anticipated new orders.


Top sellers:
Lockheed Martin: Strong sales expected from F-35 jets; missile defense systems also key.
Northrop Grumman: Growth anticipated from space programs; B-21 Raider stealth bomber highlighted.
BAE Systems: Naval vessels like Type 26 frigate expected to drive revenue; focus on cybersecurity.
Raytheon Technologies: Continued demand for air defense systems; radar technologies projected as top sellers.

Emerging Markets as New Buyers
the newst predicted new buyers
Several countries are predicted to become larger buyers of military equipment from both the UK and USA:

Indonesia: With increasing defense budgets aimed at modernizing its armed forces.
Vietnam: Expanding its military capabilities amid regional tensions in Southeast Asia.
Brazil: Looking to enhance its air force with modern fighter jets.

Lockheed Martin anticipates that countries like India, Australia, and Japan will be significant buyers due to their increasing defense budgets and strategic partnerships with the United States.
The company also sees a growing demand for its F-35 fighter jets globally. The U.S. Department of Defense’s emphasis on modernization programs further supports Lockheed’s optimistic outlook for sustained growth in international sales.

Northrop Grumman expects strong demand from NATO allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific region. Countries like South Korea and Australia are likely to be key buyers as they enhance their military capabilities amid regional tensions.

UK and USA role in bigger war most likely peacful position:
The USA and UK may strive to maintain peaceful stances while engaging diplomatically during global conflicts
In recent years, both countries have emphasized diplomacy alongside military readiness. For instance, during conflicts like those in Syria or Ukraine, the USA and UK have sought to balance military support for allies with diplomatic initiatives aimed at de-escalating tensions.