Topic: USA vs Europe war Over Greenland who would win? (Read 136 times)
Also, let the troops enter there, clowns
USA vs Europe war Over Greenland who would win?
Russia would win... because such a war would take the US out of NATO.
Russia would win... because such a war would take the US out of NATO.
Nobody is going to war. Possible outcomes will be
1. Greenland remains in Denmark after negotiations which will include increased funding.
2. Greenland signs a treaty with NATO never to allow China or Russia to build military base in that land.
3. The people of Greenland will be allowed to vote if they want to be part of the US or remain in Denmark.
4. The US and Denmark agree to be in control of the territory.
1. Greenland remains in Denmark after negotiations which will include increased funding.
2. Greenland signs a treaty with NATO never to allow China or Russia to build military base in that land.
3. The people of Greenland will be allowed to vote if they want to be part of the US or remain in Denmark.
4. The US and Denmark agree to be in control of the territory.
5. A brand new (actually, about 80 years old) entity is formed. Let's call it 'The North American Technate'. The U.S., Canada, Greenland, Columbia, and all countries between join this new union-ish thing. Governance is done mainly by AI...or at least that is what the plebs are led to believe.
It is a really interesting theory. But is it possible to establish unions like this? I imagine that the plan requires more preparations from all member countries and not only based on the desire of the United States, which acts only according to its interests. Today I found in the media news that both Mexico and Canada have submitted to Trump's demands regarding border security by sending each of them 10,000 additional soldiers to secure the border with the United States as part of the plan to combat drug trafficking and illegal immigration. In return, the US will give them a one-month grace period to decide after that whether to continue imposing 25% additional fees on the exports of those countries to the US.
Nobody is going to war. Possible outcomes will be
1. Greenland remains in Denmark after negotiations which will include increased funding.
2. Greenland signs a treaty with NATO never to allow China or Russia to build military base in that land.
3. The people of Greenland will be allowed to vote if they want to be part of the US or remain in Denmark.
4. The US and Denmark agree to be in control of the territory.
1. Greenland remains in Denmark after negotiations which will include increased funding.
2. Greenland signs a treaty with NATO never to allow China or Russia to build military base in that land.
3. The people of Greenland will be allowed to vote if they want to be part of the US or remain in Denmark.
4. The US and Denmark agree to be in control of the territory.
5. A brand new (actually, about 80 years old) entity is formed. Let's call it 'The North American Technate'. The U.S., Canada, Greenland, Columbia, and all countries between join this new union-ish thing. Governance is done mainly by AI...or at least that is what the plebs are led to believe.
Who USA side ? Whos with Europe ?
I am on the side of the people of Greenland to choose which power they want to be subordinate to. I have not heard that the people of Greenland want to change their policy and they seem to be settled with Denmark. If there should be an election or a referendum, it should be based on the will of the people and not at the request of America.
Can usa beat NATO with own military?
It will be a crazy adventure and may cause a world war between yesterday's friends. It will be a losing war for both sides because the beneficiary is the opposing alliance (China).
how USA will attack ? Using missiles?
Trump has plenty of leverage before he ever thinks about occupying Greenland by force. He will likely pressure it economically and try to push the people to demand a referendum.
will the russia help USA to right against Europe ?
I don't think anyone can answer this question. In war there are no permanent friends or enemies, only permanent interests.
I am on the side of the people of Greenland to choose which power they want to be subordinate to. I have not heard that the people of Greenland want to change their policy and they seem to be settled with Denmark. If there should be an election or a referendum, it should be based on the will of the people and not at the request of America.
Can usa beat NATO with own military?
It will be a crazy adventure and may cause a world war between yesterday's friends. It will be a losing war for both sides because the beneficiary is the opposing alliance (China).
how USA will attack ? Using missiles?
Trump has plenty of leverage before he ever thinks about occupying Greenland by force. He will likely pressure it economically and try to push the people to demand a referendum.
will the russia help USA to right against Europe ?
I don't think anyone can answer this question. In war there are no permanent friends or enemies, only permanent interests.
No, it's not going to happen, it's a bluff. 
It has come to the stage that USA becomes isolated in the world, cant go on holiday etc. as south americans and others have stated to spit on food (and other nasties) of USA tourist.
One thing is claiming the anti-American sentiment around the world has increased and people in south American and other continents are not happy with the geopolitical situation of the USA and it's allies, but it is a completely different thing to say there are isolated from the rest of the world and they do not longer have strong allies and people willing to cooperate with them.
There have been times in which the government of the USA has been highly unpopular, even among their own people and yet, that has not crippled it from carrying out their plans.
If their plan is trying to take over Greenland, then Trump will at least to try to do it in the midterm, whether the people of Greenland like it or not. It is about natural resources of Greenland, which are important to developing electrical vehicles
It has come to the stage that USA becomes isolated in the world, cant go on holiday etc. as south americans and others have stated to spit on food (and other nasties) of USA tourist.
China. The winner would be China.
And the NATO is not a significant alliance to war or devastating the world to threats of oppressions if not for defending it alliance against counterparts.
Quote
Article Five of the treaty states that if an armed attack occurs against one of the member states, it should be considered an attack against all members, and other members shall assist the attacked member, with armed forces if necessary.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_GreenlandNATO would go to war to support a member state even if the member is the cause of the war.
Quote
The dominance of the Greenland is not fostered on political crisis towards who would conquer in the zone. Perhaps the political structures of the Greenland is autocratic of who to vest it geographic zone upon.
And neither Russia or the USA has the superceding potential power. But though yeah, the Greenland had long been a horizon where the USA and the Russian has centered their attentions.
So, it is needless sensing war thereabout.
And neither Russia or the USA has the superceding potential power. But though yeah, the Greenland had long been a horizon where the USA and the Russian has centered their attentions.
So, it is needless sensing war thereabout.
Quote
The politics of Greenland, an autonomous country (Greenlandic: nuna, Danish: land) within the Kingdom of Denmark, function in a framework of a parliamentary representative democratic dependency, whereby the prime minister is the head of government, and of a multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the government. Legislative power is vested in both the government and parliament Inatsisartut. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature.
https://nato.usmission.gov/about-nato/#:~:text=The%20NATO%20Alliance%20consists%20of,with%20armed%20forces%20if%20necessary.Greenland's political structure is not autocratic, I gave it has almost all the characteristics of a democratic government.
Nobody is going to war. Possible outcomes will be
1. Greenland remains in Denmark after negotiations which will include increased funding.
2. Greenland signs a treaty with NATO never to allow China or Russia to build military base in that land.
3. The people of Greenland will be allowed to vote if they want to be part of the US or remain in Denmark.
4. The US and Denmark agree to be in control of the territory.
And the NATO is not a significant alliance to war or devastating the world to threats of oppressions if not for defending it alliance against counterparts.1. Greenland remains in Denmark after negotiations which will include increased funding.
2. Greenland signs a treaty with NATO never to allow China or Russia to build military base in that land.
3. The people of Greenland will be allowed to vote if they want to be part of the US or remain in Denmark.
4. The US and Denmark agree to be in control of the territory.
The dominance of the Greenland is not fostered on political crisis towards who would conquer in the zone. Perhaps the political structures of the Greenland is autocratic of who to vest it geographic zone upon.
And neither Russia or the USA has the superceding potential power. But though yeah, the Greenland had long been a horizon where the USA and the Russian has centered their attentions.
So, it is needless sensing war thereabout.
What's your ideas ?
I think the United States is in a position to provide security and financial resources to the people of Greenland that can't be matched by any other suitor. I think if Donald Trump wants to make Greenland a US territory, it is likely that is what will happen. With Canadian politicians talking about stopping the flow of rare earth metals to the United States as a result of tariffs, it seems like this is a no-brainer for the United States to make this purchase.
Nobody is going to war. Possible outcomes will be
1. Greenland remains in Denmark after negotiations which will include increased funding.
2. Greenland signs a treaty with NATO never to allow China or Russia to build military base in that land.
3. The people of Greenland will be allowed to vote if they want to be part of the US or remain in Denmark.
4. The US and Denmark agree to be in control of the territory.
1. Greenland remains in Denmark after negotiations which will include increased funding.
2. Greenland signs a treaty with NATO never to allow China or Russia to build military base in that land.
3. The people of Greenland will be allowed to vote if they want to be part of the US or remain in Denmark.
4. The US and Denmark agree to be in control of the territory.
Who USA side ? Whos with Europe ?
Can usa beat NATO with own military?
how USA will attack ? Using missiles?
will the russia help USA to right against Europe ?
I think If USA is alone he can't beat NATO in this war
What's your ideas ?
Can usa beat NATO with own military?
how USA will attack ? Using missiles?
will the russia help USA to right against Europe ?
I think If USA is alone he can't beat NATO in this war
What's your ideas ?
Jump to: