Author

Topic: USBasic? Anyone have more info on this? (Read 2395 times)

full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
March 14, 2013, 04:17:26 AM
#12
]
If someone has some serious photoshop skills it would be interesting to see what all the writing is on the opposite side of the tag.
"HOUSE LABELS" is obvious - below that, hard to say.  It's quite blurred..

Enigma
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 501
March 14, 2013, 03:08:37 AM
#11

6" wafer it looks like.  Probably built in an academic fab.  It's strange that the wafers have flats on 2 sides, that isn't standard.  I have a list of all operating fabs somewhere.  I seem to remember that there isn't anything below 130 nm running on 6" wafers except for an IBM MEMs research facility in Switzerland.

Given the tiny die size, and the large transistor node I find the 2.5 GH/s implication very unlikely.

If someone has some serious photoshop skills it would be interesting to see what all the writing is on the opposite side of the tag.

Is this the list you're looking for? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_semiconductor_fabrication_plants

That's a nice reference.

What I'm thinking about costs $5000 / year to subscribe and has a LOT more fabs in it that wikipedia does.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
March 14, 2013, 02:35:53 AM
#10

6" wafer it looks like.  Probably built in an academic fab.  It's strange that the wafers have flats on 2 sides, that isn't standard.  I have a list of all operating fabs somewhere.  I seem to remember that there isn't anything below 130 nm running on 6" wafers except for an IBM MEMs research facility in Switzerland.

Given the tiny die size, and the large transistor node I find the 2.5 GH/s implication very unlikely.

If someone has some serious photoshop skills it would be interesting to see what all the writing is on the opposite side of the tag.

Is this the list you're looking for? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_semiconductor_fabrication_plants
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 501
March 14, 2013, 12:51:25 AM
#9
ROFL... maybe the 2.5GH/s refers to the whole wafers output combined =P HAHA!

Could be.  IBM used to make mainframe processors that were entire 4" wafers.
legendary
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002
March 14, 2013, 12:42:02 AM
#8
ROFL... maybe the 2.5GH/s refers to the whole wafers output combined =P HAHA!
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 501
March 14, 2013, 12:25:23 AM
#7

6" wafer it looks like.  Probably built in an academic fab.  It's strange that the wafers have flats on 2 sides, that isn't standard.  I have a list of all operating fabs somewhere.  I seem to remember that there isn't anything below 130 nm running on 6" wafers except for an IBM MEMs research facility in Switzerland.

Given the tiny die size, and the large transistor node I find the 2.5 GH/s implication very unlikely.

If someone has some serious photoshop skills it would be interesting to see what all the writing is on the opposite side of the tag.
RHA
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
March 13, 2013, 07:07:30 PM
#6
Don't be silly. These are plain integrated circuits for USB (Universal Serial Bus), not for mining bitcoin.
Do you think the terms CPU, GPU, FPGA, ASIC are solely bitcoin trademarks?
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
March 13, 2013, 12:18:54 AM
#5
where did you find the pictures? URL? If more info doesn't come out it will quickly get labelled as another scam.

If they put two chips on a USB3 stick and we could add a cooler that could be interesting. BFL limits the jalapeno to 4.7ghs because of power requirements. But then I'm guessing if they only clock these at 2.5ghs they might be at 90Nm and hence use more watts per hash.

Still if they sold that for <$50 I might be interested. Plug them straight into the side of a powered USB3 hub.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
March 12, 2013, 10:40:44 PM
#4
...?

RHA
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
March 12, 2013, 06:59:28 PM
#3
Nothing to do with bitcoin. Delete the thread.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
March 12, 2013, 04:35:57 PM
#1
Saw these on imgur:









Jump to: