Topic: User 'rdbase' has blocked your personal message. (Read 502 times)

Unless you can find proof of this, then this is a baseless claim. It is like saying that all people who take small loans are looking for easy feedback because they have positive feedbacks from their lenders. While I think that all lenders should tag small loans with a neutral, most don't and provided that the borrowers pay up it doesn't make them less trustworthy than others with neutrals in any way.

Thanks mate. It's been long time. I hope everything is well with you.

This is an awareness post. His feedback scoring actually attract my attention and then I have done this DYOR and it surprised me to see for only less than $1k how one can build up a nice feedback scoring. The recent discovery of TYM scamming loan and asu scamming loan struck me too. This post inspired by those incidents.

Your feedback is the only one so far has over $100 USD transaction but look at other feedback, some of them are even for $12. This is not a good use of feedback leaving.

Not happening with a disrespectful, ingratitude fuck!


Hey brother!
I already sent a PM to Steve on that day but it seems he has not come online since that day. This was kind of abusing of self moderation right^* when the thread does not really represent his reputation or his interest. We all built up that thread and my contribution was not no lesser than anyone else.

I already gave up contributing on that thread and I won't continue in such self moderated thread as long as any official from sportsbet.io manage a new thread like this. I would like Steve (sportsbet.io) to have a look on that matter too.

That's all from me until I have a good reason to response here. Good luck to you all in winning the rewards that sportsbet drops on that thread.

Although this is not relevant to this thread, if he has any such plan (I hope he has not) to scam anyone it's up to him and them. I do not see any reason to trust someone just because they have so many green feedback. I will just leave a negative if anything happens like that.

But something I want to add considering the quote above. I feel like this user used me and others too to build up a good relationship with us. He used to send me PMs (screenshots of list of some PMs) without any real reason. He used to discuss things with me in PMs where he could easily discuss those same things on the individual threads. He used to seek information and other stuffs which obviously indicates that he was after seeking attention so that I give attention to his words and spots his activities easily. Nothing bad obviously. But other day after one response he thought enough and blocked me? When you help someone to get a recognition and once they get it, is this how they treat you? If that was my first PM with him then I could have an understanding that he is totally stranger to me. But he was not.


^* Deleted not one, not two but 3 posts. Who think those were irreverent?

Welcome back.
Missing the target here. Inserting typical DYOR for anyone but I don't personally have a concern with user rdbase, I've only left 1 feedback, but we have had several trades/loans. Unless they suddenly change their behavior significantly, you are at most dealing with a gambler. This is inline with their activities and behavior. I have also had several interactions that were not documented through additional feedback, and where fiat was involved used they used the same accounts.

The issue at hand, is what it is. OP you can either reach out to Sportsbet regarding your concerns with the moderation policy seeing as they are the driver behind it, create a different thread for discussion so that you won't be moderated. Just post for participation and grudgingly move on. All are reasonable options but there is nothing else that can be done about being ignored.

This is no trust issue though, but some personal/private dispute about deleting posts in a self-moderated thread (where some BTC is to be won tbf, paid out by a bookmaker afaik though and not by rdbase himself). The self-moderated warning on top of the thread has this covered ("if you do not want to be moderated....."), so not a lot you can do, if OP doesn't like your posts, which is of course a very subjective evaluation and probably not always fair.

Just shake hands guys

Is rdbase trying to build up some quick reputation and become the next TYM and asu?

---

Account created on September 06, 2014, 12:04:08 AM and...

First feedback has been received on 2017-09-29 from winter reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ufc-boxing10-loginsufc-in-boxing-ppvlive-vod-1118436
Tread amount $10.00 - $15.00 BTC I guess.

Second feedback from TECSHARE on 2018-08-24 without any reference.
Amount unknown but I assume it will not gonna be much. Keep reading and you will find why I said so.

Let's ignore the numerical order, it's hassling. So,

Feedback from y3804 on 2019-03-06, amount ~25USD, reference : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/need-some-help-converting-bitcoin-to-paypal-25usd-5117235

Feedback from Thecryptofan911 on 2019-07-02, no reference so no amount but judging at the above two transaction history this could be a small one too.

Feedback from md97 on 2020-01-15, there is a reference but it does not clear how much the amount was. Notice the trader was a newbie and his forum time was only one month   January 05, 2020, 07:49:46 PM - Last Active: February 05, 2020, 10:22:43 PM

Feedback from yasirmagtal on 2020-02-23 without any reference and the user was a newbie.

The above were untrusted feedback now let's come to trusted feedback

Two feedback from DT member Devawnm367 on 2019-01-21 and 2019-01-31 for amounts of .016 btc for 56$ usd and paypal for btc $60

Two feedback from DT member dozerz on 2019-03-14 and 2019-03-19. No reference but by judging on the amount so far listed this is not going to be more then $100.

Add another feedback from DT member Devawnm367 on 2019-05-18 but no reference but it mentions .03767 BTC first and if .016 btc for 56$ was only few months ago then .03767 BTC should be $131.85

One feedback left by OmegaStarScream on 2019-05-26 for 100$~ transaction

One feedback from Csmiami on 2019-06-16 for only 0.001B at a total of $12 I guess

One feedback left by Steamtyme on 2019-12-24 for ~300 CAD and this one looks a decent feedback so far.

One feedback from Royse777 on 2019-12-24, no reference but it seems he is a constant borrower. Not sure about the amount but judging from the amount he deals is not going to be much.

One feedback left from Harkorede on 2020-02-12 reference to host 0.01 BTC stake event. How could a user who live on loan even host such thing. BTC price was not much at that time I think.

One feedback from Lesbian Cow on 2020-02-13, about winning some item and paid. Not sure the amount.

One feedback from bullrun2020bro on 2020-05-28, $50 worth of amazon gift card.

One neutral feedback from Royse777 on 2020-09-10 about active loan. Amount unknown.

Let's calculate the total publicly available amount: $15.00 + $25.00 + $56.00 + $60.00 + $131.85 + $100.00 + $12.00 +  $234.67 (~300 CAD) + $92.80 (0.01 BTC at $9280 rate) + $50.00 = $777.32



My points:
1. An account from 2014, from 2014 to 2018 no significant trust or dealing history but from 2019 the account started to become a serious trust scorer.

2. Most of the feedback were left only for the amount which worth buying only peanuts.

3. Constantly seeking loan and even have an active loan. Loan repayment = Positive feedback.

4. Notice for only $777.32 publicly calculated deal his trust score shows


5. It seems he is hunting for easy feedback and pretty successful in it.

Obviously this user was thinking it's time to build up a good reputation and he started doing this small deals and building up a rep. At some point if he turns out to be TYM or asu then no surprise. Hack this could be even a bought account by judging at the trade habit before 2019 and after 2019.

---

I would not trust this account for more than $100.

Seems same to me as well. He is just trying to do his job better now that we have new guys joining the thread. IIRC we had an unmoderated thread for the same purpose but it was locked down and new one was created with self-moderation.


Yeah. I have seen you adding a lot to thread earlier. Feels really bad when this happens when we have our little community growing. Come on, don't quit the thread like this.

Just take what suchmoon said and continue on like that.

But you are allowed to participate in the competition, aren't you? Ok so you have a disagreement with rdbase about something but it seems like an overkill to slam the door and walk away. Post your entry or whatever you need to do to participate and I'm sure rdbase won't delete it.

From my view I don't think there's anything wrong with what you've posted maybe he was just fed up with the questions. Based on the deleted posts I guess he doesn't want the thread to become a chat box and ruin it.

I encourage you to join the thread my only advice is to calm down for now and try not to think about the deleted posts too much.  

I already moved on and here is the message for all on that thread.


What hurts is that after all these days I had this at the end for me, just because he is the topic starter.

He deleted my post, I asked why on the topic in pubic. I was not rude there.



He deleted that too with the response of this



Now check the time of his response to Trofo
As this is like I was reading his post one day prior he made the post with answer LOL

Then I sent his this message


He responded this


Then I wanted to respond him with the message I have in the first post and found out blocked! LOL

It seems he is enjoying his time with the privilege of being the self moderator on that topic.

Fuck! this is a JJG type post I am going to post now 😜

Edit:
No I can not but this is very rude when you do this to a member who had long contribution to a thread he loved.

This is very good suggestion from @The Pharmacist if he don't want to talk then surely you have to respect his decsion and leave this all creating this thread is not good this all can sort out without any issue with in few minutes just respect others opinion as well hopefully we will have some better in few hours about this issue.

Or it might have something to do with the OP getting hacked and their PMs leaked not too long ago. Not sure what the purpose of this thread is - you can't force someone to talk to you if they don't want to.

Sounds to me like rdbase was anticipating a debate with you via PM that he didn't want to engage in, so he pre-emptively blocked you.  I've done that in the past with certain members.  Either you take great offense to it (which you seem to be doing here) or you just let it go.  Ultimately, the bickering that you want to do is unnecessary and I would just forget about it and move on.

Obviously you've found out that some members here are a lot more prickly than others.

Fantastic.
I am off and good luck to ya all on that thread.

Why the fuck?