Topic: Vape Products Shouldn't be Banned (Read 380 times)

But that's not the case fully. The US government (States and Local governments in particular) would be able to regulate vape products and place a sin tax on them as well. Do I think this is the right thing  to do? No. Because I do truly think that vape products are used by adults to ease off the health issues when it comes to using cigarettes.

Government should have never become reliant on the taxes that they got from cigarettes and such, that's an issue in and of itself. They should be cutting their expenses in order to not have to rely on sin taxes, but they're not going to do that because government is government. They're going to spend more, complain about less taxes, ban things, tax more things, and so on.

But a boy can dream.

Agreed. Vape is much less harmful than cigarettes. Also, in my opinion, it will disappear itself when it gets out of fashion

IMHO only government hate vape products because they will lose a big chunk from their tax income if more people start using vape instead of cigarettes.

Yes, anything you ingest while smoking isn't going to be healthy. Obviously nicotine is bad for you. But is nicotine as bad for you as all the tars and all that horrible shit in that are in cigarettes? No. It's not.

Vaping for people that have cigarettes right now is a way to either ease off of cigarettes or to at least get a healthier way of ingesting nicotine.

I don't understand the hatred towards vapes when people are literally dying every year because of cigarettes.

^^^ But the real question is freedom.

If government wants people to NOT be free, then make laws. If they want people to be free don't make laws. After all, laws just make for agitation, and don't really stop anything anyway.

How do you help people by not making laws? Advertise and warn. Then give the people what they have gotten themselves into. If the family won't support and take care of the addict who has been overwhelmingly warned... mass public graves when they die. And asylums where they are free to kill off each other.

Why should the freedom of people who heed the warnings, be removed or taxed to take care of those who won't listen? The street druggies of Frisco and Sacramento should be dumped into wide, open-inside buildings where they can fight it out and kill each other off. This will protect the good people of San Francisco.

supposedly, the amount of nicotine you ingest can be higher when using vapes. And nicotine isn't so healthy even without all the other toxic substances you're exposed to through smoking.

But if you can get some assurance that certain producers of nicotine solutions for vaping are at a given (low) concentration, you could probably get what's actually promoted with vaping, instead of swapping low nicotine product for a high nicotine product.

---

The whole thing seems a little ridiculous to me overall. Smoking is that embodiment of "I just don't give a fuck, watch me prove it by inhaling addictive toxic smoke". Vaping is saying "I'm an addict, and I don't have the willpower to give up, and don't get that it looks a bit desperate"

Smoke or give up. Anything in between comes across as psychological weakness. Either you give zero fucks and can control yourself and your will, or you can't.

Smoked for ~7 years, bought a $30 Juul almost 2 years ago and haven't touched a cig ever since.  Haven't even had to replace the Juul and don't feel any motivation to buy one of those crazy kits where you mix the juices and can fill up a room with a cloud.  

I feel like it's definitely more healthy less unhealthy.  I used to get colds and have a sore throat pretty often, especially during the winter.
 That seems to have gotten much better.  Plus I was always very self conscious about my hands and breath smelling.  

Hopefully they don't figure out the vapers are killing themselves faster than the smokers, that would suck.  I'd still want to know though.

I think it's good they are putting a lot of effort into discouraging kids from trying it.  I imagine it's a lot easier to get addicted since it's much more convenient to sneak a puff throughout the day and the nicotine content is much higher.  I know nicotine doesn't kill people but no good reason to get addicted to it.

Vape juices can be made by anyone from their home itself so cigarette companies making this ban by influencing governments.

I know why they're turning against vaping products because you see more and more kids use them. Teenagers are vaping everywhere because there are no rules concerning these things and they can be used in public with no age limit. They are afraid that kids will get addicted to nicotine in young age and parents won't even know because the smell is easy to hide.

I'm also against any kinds of bans and actually like the smell of these oils. I don't smoke and I don't vape, but I dislike cigarette smoke and can always smell it on other people.
That said, I understand the point of regulating vaping products. Somebody should make sure these things aren't sold to and used by kids and the oils are free of harmful substances.

I don't think they should be banned but they should be taxed as "vice" like liquor and alcohol. People should be alllowed to use them but not inconvenience others. In my country they decided to leave the banning to the local government but it's banned from use in public everywhere.

IMHO products like this and alcohol and cigarettes should make people ineligible for insurance on related diseases. For example if you smoked yourself to lung cancer you should have it treated with money out of your pocket.


I don't think they'd cause more harm than cigarettes. They still have nicotine but it can be less than those in cigars and it don't have all the other harmful byproducts.

What I think worries people is it's making it "hip" for teens to vape and that it might get them to use actual cigarettes. Which is the opposite of what vaping was originally intended for, to get people off tobacco, slowly dial down nicotine intake and quit nicotine addiction for good.

Good point here. All this banning is pointing to taxes. Those cigarettes and alcohol they say were paying taxes and regulated. So, they are looking into vape as a source of income for government and also possibly that lobbying from tobacco companies is strong. Tobacco sales maybe and surely affected as vaping is becoming popular.

If you can't believe governments on a subject like vaping, how can you believe governments on anything?

It's absolutely, 100% okay if government tobacco revenues go to zero because of vaping.

Well for me, if cigarettes aren't banned in a certain country, then there's no logic in banning vapes. I mean, it's the lesser of the two evil so why not focus on cigarettes first where a whole lot more people are affected? Though we can't really do anything about it if a government implements such orders. We can voice our our minds but we don't have any choice but to follow.

Correct! If Vape products would be totally banned, then  the main beneficiaries will be the the following entities:
1. Cigarette manufacturers -> increase in revenue
2. Government -> which stands to collect more tax from tobacco industry
3. Politicians -> donation recipient from Tobacco industry lobbyists
4. Tobacco farmers - increase in revenue

And as usual, the ordinary people have got everything to lose! 

I am not supporting vape but if government cares about their people's health then why they allowed cigarettes and alcohols they are supposed to be same injurious but still it was legal as long as people paying lot of taxes to buy those products.

Sadly I think thats all there is to it, vaping vilified to bring on tax parity.

Essentially nothing is banned in a correctly formed Private Membership Association (PMA).

Government is for directing the public. Private, as long as nobody is harmed, is outside of the pervue of governmental regulation. PMAs are set up based on Constitution, Amendments, and 70 Supreme Court cases that bar government from regulating private activities done in private. Again, there must be full disclosure of dangers involved with whatever activity the PMA does. But the government must show clear, provable dangers to uninformed members of the PMA before it becomes a public thing.

Google and Yuotube search on "Private Membership Association."

nicotine damages cardio-vascular tissue, it makes arteries less flexible in response to increased bloodflow

forget about the whole "vaping is healthy" angle, you're pretty much begging to be "helped" by government intervention that way

This is so sad i never thought that the government would ban a product that doesn't contain any chemical due to misunderstandings. I thought vape was a revolutionary product that could finally stop the use of cigarettes and even cause smokers to stop. Honestly they're all acting in assumptions right now where in fact vape haven't killed anybody but that was cause by cigarettes that contains nicotine. Why dont they conduct an experiment to see which is dangerous towards human health ?

Many DIY experiments between vape and cigarettes proves that smoking cigarette is 10 times more harmful for our lungs compared to vaping.If every smoker turned into vapers then how all these cigarette manufacturers will live so they will influence any governments to ban the products then they can sell them for more price then before.Government also has advantage of allowing cigarette like getting high tax for every cigarette getting sold in their country.

This whole vape scare is about the tax revenue the state is not collecting on standard tobacco products. This is all to justify taxing vape products just like tobacco.

why should it make a difference whether it's healthy or not?


if tax policy setters get to decide what you should and shouldn't do, is there any real point in calling your life yours? whose life are you living, if all your decisions are already made for you? there's no point in us being separate people if we have our range of choices constantly eroded closer to zero.

Where's all the creative thinking that we really need going to come from if the biggest inspiration in your life is "why can't these people leave us all alone, I'm being healthy, I'm being a good slave, can't you find a reason to pick on someone else? "

Why don't you find the inspiration to stand up and refuse, instead? You only have one life, why spend it afraid of bullies? Why waste the one chance you've got to do the right thing, just because it's easier to back down?

Just like vape cigarettes also addictive to the wearer.
I as an active vape user feel that vape is the solution for me to stop smoking, because the content of cigarettes contains a lot of toxins and has been proven to cause many diseases in our body, while vape has not yet been proven scientifically proven to damage the body, so why should users are prohibited from consuming it !!

I agree with your thoughts OP. Banning vape products would be overkill. Vaping probably is less harmful than smoking. So, if e-cigarettes would be banned, it would mean that most people who wape now would switch to cigarettes. Do they really want that? It's obvious that e-cigarettes isn't saint, but sometimes I feel that this negative attitude in media against it is sponsored by tobacco industry.
I also support thing like taxes and more strict regulations. Because current situation is simply ridiculous. On every corner I see 12 year old kids vaping - they can buy vaping products without any restrictions.
Also, I would like to hear your thoughts about IQOS. I haven't tried it, but from what I understand it stands between traditional and e-cigarettes?

it won't make any difference anyway, because banning anything has never in the history of banning things succeeded. Never.

And smokers don't care about your argument. People who continued to smoke cigarettes instead of vaping say things like "vaping... it's all clean and clinical, who fucking wants that? I smoke cos I want that dirty smell on my fingers, if I wanted to be clean I'd start eating salad, become a buddhist and buy oxygen tanks"

Using a logical argument usually doesn't make sense when people want to be considered wrong or bad They KNOW it's wrong, and they like it that way. It's a kind of masochism, which is why I'm partly (PARTLY) onboard with one aspect of the Bernie Sanders lobby: abolition of prison. Alot of people in prison sort of want to be there for complicated and fucked up psychological reasons, the only people that arguably need to be there are (a) very small proportion of dangerously violent people (b) politicians, corporate CEOs and military top brass who aren't stupid enough to wind up in prison under any circumstances. Of course the Bernie people screw it all up by saying that it should be replaced with "rehabilitation", which is going to be the exact same prison system rebranded with "social conscience" or whatever. I don't see why we should pay for people to be housed & fed (or "rehabilitated") when getting punished for anything is actually what they want or need in some deeply psychologically screwy way

...and by the way I am not saying that vaping is great, just that it helped to get two of my good friends off chain smoking death sticks

Yeah, that's not how science or medicine works. Everyone thought thalidomide was totally safe based on a small amount of data, and then thousands of children were born with horrendous birth defects.

I'll concede they contain fewer ingredients than cigarettes (more than 5, though), but that does not make them inherently safer. There has also been very little studying of what these compounds break down to or combine to form when heated. There are ingredients which aren't present in cigarettes at all such as diacetyl, which can cause fatal lung diseases such as bronchiolitis obliterans, a disease that is not linked to smoking cigarettes.

They have. European countries have heterogeneous reporting methods (and some have no reporting system at all), so the data is incomplete when compared to the US. But there categorically have been severe illnesses and deaths:
https://casereports.bmj.com/content/2018/bcr-2018-224350
https://www.bmj.com/content/366/bmj.l5275
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/30/death-factory-worker-first-britain-linked-vaping/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/14/first-belgian-death-linked-vaping-teen-given-e-cigarette-18th/
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/vaping-death-lipoid-pneumonia-17005080

I think Big Tobacco is one of the chief forces behind banning vaping.
Real life cases, I have two friends who used to smoke 1-2 packs a day.
They are both nerds, so when vaping came out, they for into vaping because it was kind of a game.
They would mix their own mixtures, chose amount of nicotine, flavors, etc.
This gave them a nerd feel, and control of what goes into what they smoke.
This has been going for years, they vape much less than they used to smoke.
They do not smoke at all, just vape.
Their clothes are not soaked with stink, their friends enjoy their company more, their health is better.
People around them do not suffer from second hand smoke.
Thats 2 people not smoking 1-2 packs a day, EVERY DAY, having effect on Big Tobacco bottom line.
I have a really hard time buying into banning vapes.

I totally disagree with you,we can already predict with the few data we have today that vaping is a lot less harmful than cigarettes just by comparing their ingredients.E-cigs have at most 5 different ingredients while cigarettes contain more than 600 ingredients,most of them known to be harmful.I'm not saying that vaping is totally safe,but for a smoker,going for vaping instead is totally worth it.



Why regulated e-cigs in europe haven't caused any death? Simply because e-cigs doesn't and shouldn't contain oils that cause respiratory failure.In the US,because of the unregulated market,vendors started selling juices that contain THC and other stuff,this is different because CBD and THC are not water soluble,you have to add oil in them in order to be vaped that's why people died from these.Conclusion:juices must be REGULATED and not banned.

The one that caused the problem wasn't the PG/VG liquid one, but THC liquid, especially junk product mixed with Vitamin E acetate. I think Tobacco companies use this momentum to pressure the regulator.

Nevertheless, if the government ban e-juice, it's not a big deal. You could mix it by yourself. It is really easy I made my own e-juice for years, and still alive.

We don't know that though. Many smoking related diseases take decades to develop. On top of that, many of these diseases - heart attacks, strokes, cancers - occur frequently in non smokers too. We would need huge amounts of data over 30+ years to be able to say "These products aren't as harmful as cigarettes". That data simply doesn't exist. What we do know is that these things are filled with a variety of new and untested chemicals, and people using them have died as a direct result. If cigarettes were invented for the first time today, I have no doubt the FDA would ban them too.

I'm not saying I agree with their stance (I don't), but I understand the reasons they are taking it. We have no idea if these are better, as bad as, or potentially even worse, than cigarettes.

people need to be aware that there is a mega differnce between e-cig and e-liquids(vapes)

e-cig is usually just nicotine water
e-liquid (vapes) are a mix of many things
and its these 'many things' that does need to be looked at

maybe not ban. but atleast ensure there is some quality standards and limiting of potency/chemical mix
i have sen a few people who would never smoke weed. but thn think a vape is just a vape and try thc or cbd oils and think nothing of it.. later they act like typical druggie stereotypes of people hooked on weed

as for other chemicals. stuff like 'popcorn lung' (sugar collecting in lungs) is a real harm and can harm someone faster than cigarette tar or asbestos

I think the biggest takeaway here is that the FDA is failing to regulate the space properly. Instead of doing proper testing on vape products, or ensuring that these random vape products follow the rules -- they just put an all out order to ban things (or a recommendation rather)

Vape products, when properly regulated, ensuring that the juices used aren't as harmful as cigarettes (or something along those lines) are a medical phenomenen and can be used to ease people off of cigarettes.

It's not even the fact that Cigs have been around for so long -- it's that we already know that they're bad and they're killing people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVM3M3o2Nao

Check this video out -- it's about how the FDA was going to endorse vaping but then stopped due to the fact that kids were getting hooked on ecigs. It's a great watch.

The move to ban vaping is not just happening in the US. It's also being pushed from where I'm from.

We all know that cigarettes are addictive, how about vape products?

 

This is a false equivalence. Cigarettes have been around for over 100 years and there are a billion people who smoke them. Vaping has been around for 10 years and has a few million users. Most of the deaths from smoking come from diseases like lung cancer or COPD which can take years or decades to develop. It will be many years before the health risks of vaping are fully understood.

Furthermore, there have indeed been deaths from vaping which were using purely nicotine products and not THC products.

Sure, cigarettes are full of numerous horrible additives, but there are plenty of additives in vaping liquids and oils which aren't present in cigarettes and we have very little data for.

They might be. You can't say they aren't because we don't have the data yet.

Exactly.

I don't think vaping products should be banned, because I don't think any drugs should be illegal. You should be free to put whatever you want in your own body provided you don't infringe on anybody else's rights while doing so, and you are fully prepared to pay for the (often very expensive) consequences, not least of them being the health problems. But don't go fooling yourself in to think that these products are safe

We've all seen in the news in the US for the last couple months that all these different vape products and vape flavors are being put under increased scrutiny and being banned because of myths and misunderstandings put out by people.

This is while 480,000 people die annually due to cigarettes and only a handful of people have died from vape products -- which were illegally sourced THC concentrate vape products. Not even products such as JUUL, and other nicotine vape products.

Everyone and their mothers knows that its much safer to just use nicotine and nicotine products such as JUUL instead of smoking cigarettes. Cigarettes are beyond horrible for you. People are peddled this lie that JUUL might be worse for you then Cigs.

And the honest answer is we don't know yet as we don't know the long term effects. BUT -- if we already know that Cigs are horrible for you and we haven't had any issues with E-Cigs in their decade or so on the marketplace then I think I know which one we should go with.

Yes the Government should impose their regulations and their taxes on these products -- but come on guys lets fucking fix the problem of smoking and use E-Cigs to ease people off of Cigs instead of just pushing them back towards the worst legal product known to man.