How can the community do that if not Satoshi himself do so, but the surprising part of it is that nothing of such will ever happen, if what bitcoin is all about is on privacy and decentralization, then Satoshi being the father of bitcoin as you call it will always remain anonymous, what does it have to benefit you if he comes out today that am Satoshi, what we needed is the solution he gave and not his physical appearance.
The problem is that the work of the man behind Satoshi, who I think is Valery Chadlize, exceeds that of Bitcoin in many ways. The character's anonymity is no longer relevant now that Valery Chalidze is dead. As much during his lifetime, we could understand his desire to protect his privacy and of course his security, we can also think that the anonymity of the creator is a key piece of decentralization, linked to the message of humility. To the desire to create a myth. To make it a collective invention and not attached to a man-god. Maybe for a while anyway.
But the lack of information calls for a natural response.
Human beings need to reduce the entropy around them, and the satoshi mystery is one of them. It's the game I would say, since an increase in information as to the identity of the inventor of Bitcoin could drastically reduce the gray area as to the intentions of the invention itself. And definitely discredit the critics of the proof of work as to its supposedly wasteful, affirming the creators of ex-nihilo pieces.
We would learn Bitcoin's true purpose as an entropy reducer and order stabilizer in human society.
Are we wasting the lives of children by teaching them that Santa Claus does not exist, that his hides behind a simple human being? No, it's the beginning of maturity, the acceptance of a certain complexity.
I invite you to read "Entropy Demystified: Potential Order, Life and Money" if you haven't already, the debate should ideally focus more on the ideas of this book.
You should have just gone straight to this point, rather than the long text.
But no, the community doesn't need to know the identity of Satoshi. Privacy is a very important aspect of BTC, so just as i wouldn't want you or anyone in this forum to know my identity, Satoshi also probably wants the same thing, and he would be disappointed if the community join in the unnecessary manhunt for him, everyone deserves privacy, including Satoshi.
But no, the community doesn't need to know the identity of Satoshi. Privacy is a very important aspect of BTC, so just as i wouldn't want you or anyone in this forum to know my identity, Satoshi also probably wants the same thing, and he would be disappointed if the community join in the unnecessary manhunt for him, everyone deserves privacy, including Satoshi.
It's your opinion. But as I explain above, I allow myself this since Valery Chadlize is dead so the argument of privacy is no longer relevant. It is a desire for homage, and it would be absurd to ignore the other works of a genius since, unfortunately, Valery Chalidze is still a complete unknown, especially in the field of physics and cosmology. He is only known on the Internet as a staunch defender of human rights.
Valery Chadlize, once the puzzle has been put together, is much bigger than Satoshi Nakamoto in this regard.
