Author

Topic: Vega 56/64 owners-report your Hashrate (Read 3461 times)

newbie
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
November 15, 2017, 06:42:27 AM
#14
You might want to check this post out   https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/74hjqn/monero_and_vega_the_definitive_guide/

With the registry edits and other tweaks a 56 can and is running @ 1800+ h/s @ 130w and a 64 @ 1900+ h/s @ 145w per card

I have both and can confirm im getting 7.5khs from 1 56 & 3 64's on monero / etn etc.

Not tried it on eth yet but have plans to test them although people are showing 41-44mh/s on eth using the same settings.
sr. member
Activity: 375
Merit: 250
August 17, 2017, 02:33:03 AM
#13
My take on the Vega is it might be capable of ~40MH/s if we can mod the timings like we did for Polaris. Stock an RX Vega is currently rated at around 35-37MH/s according to the guy in the claymore thread doing benches (last page). This is not bad, but the power consumption is way too high for it to make real sense, especially since the price is pretty high. I think 2x 570/580 can do better for about the same price at the moment.

You will see driver optimizations, miner optimization etc., but as a lot of us suspected, Vega isn't the miner's dream everyone wanted it to be.

This is just my opinion, but I would cancel my pre-order if I had one if I were only to use this for mining.

It is disappointed result, as previous rumors said 70mh/s  Embarrassed

How about the power usage?

70mh/s is a lie, 100mh/s is the biggest lie ever...
Vega is a failure since Lisa Su already stated very clearly that AMD does not believe in miners' interests and does not to sell to miners in the near future...
so...buy more Nvidia stock Grin

You are right about AMD, but I don't think nvidia will believe in crypto world too. P106 result not so promising and what happen to P104 that planned to launch by Jul 2017?
sr. member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 311
August 15, 2017, 09:04:42 AM
#12
It certainly appears that Vega isn't the ground breaking hardware some thought it would be. It's looking like a good card for games/graphics but it's current power consumption relative to moderate hash boost isn't cost effective AT THIS TIME.

I expect over the coming months as miners and mods start to come out and be refined, combined with progressive price decreases as it ages it will become more attractive.

Still, right now, for the price you're better off pound for pound sticking with 1080tis or 480/580 for best price efficiency.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 104
August 15, 2017, 08:56:26 AM
#11
You guys are about to get disappointed:

Vega 56:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Radeon_RX_Vega_56/34.html

Vega 64:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Radeon_RX_Vega_64/34.html

Bottom line:
It's better than Polaris, but it's a powerhog. GTX 1060/1070 still the best choice as their performance won't degrade soon like 4xx/5xx.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
August 15, 2017, 08:18:09 AM
#10
My take on the Vega is it might be capable of ~40MH/s if we can mod the timings like we did for Polaris. Stock an RX Vega is currently rated at around 35-37MH/s according to the guy in the claymore thread doing benches (last page). This is not bad, but the power consumption is way too high for it to make real sense, especially since the price is pretty high. I think 2x 570/580 can do better for about the same price at the moment.

You will see driver optimizations, miner optimization etc., but as a lot of us suspected, Vega isn't the miner's dream everyone wanted it to be.

This is just my opinion, but I would cancel my pre-order if I had one if I were only to use this for mining.

It is disappointed result, as previous rumors said 70mh/s  Embarrassed

How about the power usage?

70mh/s is a lie, 100mh/s is the biggest lie ever...
Vega is a failure since Lisa Su already stated very clearly that AMD does not believe in miners' interests and does not to sell to miners in the near future...
so...buy more Nvidia stock Grin
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
August 15, 2017, 08:12:25 AM
#9
Hello,

I know most don't have it yet but if you do-

Could you post what are you getting? I have it on pre-order and fingers cross I get it but I'd like to see the performance.

I'm assuming lot of driver optimizations are needed before they would work as intended. Report and official specs do report a huge increase in RAW compute power and memory also.

Maybe we can keep this thread for hash rate comparisons?

TIA
How much did you pay for the pre-order?

$850 CAD
I had 1080ti on order which I cancelled for Vega 64- i hope I didn't make a wrong choice lol
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
August 15, 2017, 08:11:41 AM
#8
I see most are talking about ETH

How about other coins ?

I mean the RAW compute power and newer Memory is very good-yes-power hungry but since we are getting coins popping up-I assume there will be few things that can utilize it's full potential ?
sr. member
Activity: 375
Merit: 250
August 15, 2017, 04:18:51 AM
#7
My take on the Vega is it might be capable of ~40MH/s if we can mod the timings like we did for Polaris. Stock an RX Vega is currently rated at around 35-37MH/s according to the guy in the claymore thread doing benches (last page). This is not bad, but the power consumption is way too high for it to make real sense, especially since the price is pretty high. I think 2x 570/580 can do better for about the same price at the moment.

You will see driver optimizations, miner optimization etc., but as a lot of us suspected, Vega isn't the miner's dream everyone wanted it to be.

This is just my opinion, but I would cancel my pre-order if I had one if I were only to use this for mining.

It is disappointed result, as previous rumors said 70mh/s  Embarrassed

How about the power usage?
sr. member
Activity: 487
Merit: 266
August 15, 2017, 01:21:19 AM
#6
My take on the Vega is it might be capable of ~40MH/s if we can mod the timings like we did for Polaris. Stock an RX Vega is currently rated at around 35-37MH/s according to the guy in the claymore thread doing benches (last page). This is not bad, but the power consumption is way too high for it to make real sense, especially since the price is pretty high. I think 2x 570/580 can do better for about the same price at the moment.

You will see driver optimizations, miner optimization etc., but as a lot of us suspected, Vega isn't the miner's dream everyone wanted it to be.

This is just my opinion, but I would cancel my pre-order if I had one if I were only to use this for mining.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 258
August 14, 2017, 11:45:13 PM
#5
As I seen on forums very problematic side of vega is power consumption, even when is very stron undervolted.
And if you want to mine gpu coins look like will be very hard. And even for ethereum we will need some good core
cloks if they realy can do about 100m, but very hard to bleive in that...
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
August 14, 2017, 11:24:07 PM
#4
Please tell me where to re-order it in the US?
full member
Activity: 157
Merit: 100
come to the dark side
August 14, 2017, 09:14:59 PM
#3
Hello,

I know most don't have it yet but if you do-

Could you post what are you getting? I have it on pre-order and fingers cross I get it but I'd like to see the performance.

I'm assuming lot of driver optimizations are needed before they would work as intended. Report and official specs do report a huge increase in RAW compute power and memory also.

Maybe we can keep this thread for hash rate comparisons?

TIA
How much did you pay for the pre-order?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
August 14, 2017, 09:13:07 PM
#2
i guess you might be get very disappointed  Tongue
hard to believe that software optimization could double or even triple the mining performance, since currently RX Vega 64 can only achieve ~35MH/s... Undecided
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
August 14, 2017, 06:55:03 PM
#1
Hello,

I know most don't have it yet but if you do-

Could you post what are you getting? I have it on pre-order and fingers cross I get it but I'd like to see the performance.

I'm assuming lot of driver optimizations are needed before they would work as intended. Report and official specs do report a huge increase in RAW compute power and memory also.

Maybe we can keep this thread for hash rate comparisons?

TIA
Jump to: