Today I saw a black kid wearing a shirt with the lovely idols of Trayvon and Michael Brown and below it said the word "Hope".
So instead of putting 2 successful intellectual blacks on his shirt (which that kid wouldn't be able to name one most likely) he choose to idolize 2 people that are less than stellar citizens whose only notoriety is how they died. If black people aspire to stay out of trouble more than they aspire to become successful then I see no "hope" for them - talking as a generality.
Topic: VIDEO: Pack Of Black Thugs Surround White 13-Year-Old… It Does Not End Well (Read 2119 times)
August 21, 2015, 02:33:32 AM
August 20, 2015, 03:09:54 PM
a few years ago these savages would have been slow burned to death for this. where is your pride, white man?
poor blacks commit crime at higher rates than poor whites and the socioeconomic conditions blacks create for themselves are a result of their own dysfunctional nature not something other races did to them. let natural selection take care of this retrograde subspecies of humanity instead of artificially sustaining them with welfare and international aid.
there is no benefit to america or any western country having blacks. the contribution made by the few decent productive ones is always outweighed by the cost of taking care of the welfare recipient single mother whores and dealing with their criminal offspring. and there ARE decent productive blacks who buck the trend and defy their flawed genes to succeed in the civilised world, don't get me wrong, but they need to blame their brethren for giving them a bad name, not the white folks who quite reasonably look upon them all with suspicion.
poor blacks commit crime at higher rates than poor whites and the socioeconomic conditions blacks create for themselves are a result of their own dysfunctional nature not something other races did to them. let natural selection take care of this retrograde subspecies of humanity instead of artificially sustaining them with welfare and international aid.
there is no benefit to america or any western country having blacks. the contribution made by the few decent productive ones is always outweighed by the cost of taking care of the welfare recipient single mother whores and dealing with their criminal offspring. and there ARE decent productive blacks who buck the trend and defy their flawed genes to succeed in the civilised world, don't get me wrong, but they need to blame their brethren for giving them a bad name, not the white folks who quite reasonably look upon them all with suspicion.
August 20, 2015, 02:56:36 PM
Not sure what the color of their skin has to do with anything...a thug is a thug regardless of whether they're black/white/yellow/green.
August 20, 2015, 02:19:19 PM
This type of crimes will probably happen more and more often - there is no real way to stop it
August 20, 2015, 01:53:01 PM
There have been many, many wars in Africa, however, some of which are still occurring today.
There have been many many in Europe too. BFD. How does that make blacks worse?Blacks have been killing other blacks for centuries. Tribes genocide by other tribes. Blacks on black crime isn't real? Please.
Whites have been doing the same thing to whites. BFD. How does that make black people worse? August 20, 2015, 01:51:25 PM
That's because blacks were never in a position to launch a war on par with the world wars we've had.
So you are basically speculating that they would had they been given the opportunity. It's not something you have an actual evidence for, it's just an assumption you're making. August 20, 2015, 01:49:23 PM
this is the result of centuries of persecution & discrimination.
chickens have come home to roost.
want to stop this?
end poverty and extreme inequality.
chickens have come home to roost.
want to stop this?
end poverty and extreme inequality.
August 20, 2015, 01:48:36 PM
Welp, that explains it. WHEW.
Glad we weren't discussing current events.
The OP is implying blacks are inherently violent.Glad we weren't discussing current events.
When you make claims on a political discussion forum, you can expect to have them challenged. This is not a personal soap box. You don't get to make statements free from criticism here.
August 20, 2015, 01:46:07 PM
Crime is a byproduct of freedom. There was less freedom for them 50 years ago than there is now.
lol, so now it's an issue of freedom and not poverty? Nice movement of the goal posts. Any other excuses you wish to make for black criminality? August 20, 2015, 01:45:23 PM
August 20, 2015, 01:42:37 PM
Yes. They even sold their own kind into slavery.
The argument here is that black people are more violent than white people. So far no one has been able to show actual evidence of that.No one has made the argument that black people are perfect or never commit crimes or do bad things. Thats a non-sequitur.
The same people that whine about white people being unfairly judged are doing the exact same thing to black people in this thread. It's a glowing example of hypocrisy.
August 20, 2015, 01:41:59 PM
I'm done wasting my time with him. He can't be taken serious. He's too busy talking about the only people responding to this being the white racists, and blacks not starting wars, etc etc blah blah blah. I've got much better things to do than to sit here and pretend that he's making any sense.
I am perfectly ok commenting on your posts without response. Participation in the forum is completely voluntary. You can even add me to your ignore list if you want. August 20, 2015, 01:40:36 PM
Crime is a byproduct of freedom. There was less freedom for them 50 years ago than there is now.
Thanks for making it clear that to stop them they'd have to have their freedom taken away. August 20, 2015, 01:39:45 PM
Nevermind the fact that genocides have been waged in Africa for thousands of years as part of their tribal warfare history, which continues to this very day.
So what? White people have done the same and worse. Should we judge all white people by the actions of a few as well?Stalin and Hitler alone pretty much have a monopoly on human suffering in the 20th century between them.
August 20, 2015, 01:39:08 PM
Here we have an example of the "noble savage theory"
I am not advocating any theory. I am stating a fact. You can't say that blacks are inherently more violent when the majority of modern wars are waged by white people. August 20, 2015, 01:38:14 PM
Blacks have been killing other blacks for centuries. Tribes genocide by other tribes. Blacks on black crime isn't real? Please.
I'm done wasting my time with him. He can't be taken serious. He's too busy talking about the only people responding to this being the white racists, and blacks not starting wars, etc etc blah blah blah. I've got much better things to do than to sit here and pretend that he's making any sense.Here we have an example of the "noble savage theory" that white progressives subscribe to. Non-whites are too righteous and pure to engage in warfare, only whites are capable of that kind of thing. Nevermind the fact that genocides have been waged in Africa for thousands of yearsp as art of their tribal warfare history, which continues to this very day.
Yes. They even sold their own kind into slavery. August 20, 2015, 01:35:20 PM
Statistically, poor people are most likely to be violent. Statistically, black people are a lot more likely to be poor than white people.
Hows about them statistics?
Except that doesn't explain the phenomenon of black crime. Hispanics are a larger minority group than blacks and have a similar percentage of their population living below the poverty line, and are actually more likely to drop out of high school and not graduate college than blacks, yet they commit a fraction of the violent crime that blacks commit.Hows about them statistics?
Quote
The next excuse thrown out would be "racism", yet blacks were not as violent 50 years ago when there was much more racism against them to deal with.
Crime is a byproduct of freedom. There was less freedom for them 50 years ago than there is now. August 20, 2015, 01:34:00 PM
Someone should tell this kid only black lives matter.
August 20, 2015, 01:33:21 PM
Not in wars. Black people were not fighting other black people in WW2, or Korea, or Vietnam, or Iraq.
Here we have an example of the "noble savage theory" that white progressives subscribe to. Non-whites are too righteous and pure to engage in warfare, only whites are capable of that kind of thing. Nevermind the fact that genocides have been waged in Africa for thousands of years as part of their tribal warfare history, which continues to this very day. August 20, 2015, 01:32:13 PM
Because it is only white racists that are talking about this right now. Non-white racists exist, but they not the ones in this thread.
Obviously you can't be serious. Maybe we should just come back to this at a later time. August 20, 2015, 01:31:09 PM
Not in wars. Black people were not fighting other black people in WW2, or Korea, or Vietnam, or Iraq.
Blacks have been killing other blacks for centuries. Tribes genocide by other tribes. Blacks on black crime isn't real? Please. August 20, 2015, 01:30:20 PM
I am saying it is a socio-economic cause, not a racial cause.
If you are saying black people are violent, I would point out that most wars in human history have not been waged by black people. Especially in the last few centuries. Black people, as a race, tend to be on the receiving end of violence.
That's because blacks were never in a position to launch a war on par with the world wars we've had. There have been many, many wars in Africa, however, some of which are still occurring today. If you are saying black people are violent, I would point out that most wars in human history have not been waged by black people. Especially in the last few centuries. Black people, as a race, tend to be on the receiving end of violence.
August 20, 2015, 01:29:26 PM
I am saying it is a socio-economic cause, not a racial cause.
If you are saying black people are violent, I would point out that most wars in human history have not been waged by black people. Especially in the last few centuries. Black people, as a race, tend to be on the receiving end of violence.
If you are saying black people are violent, I would point out that most wars in human history have not been waged by black people. Especially in the last few centuries. Black people, as a race, tend to be on the receiving end of violence.
Welp, that explains it. WHEW.
Glad we weren't discussing current events.
August 20, 2015, 01:27:47 PM
Mostly from other blacks.
Not in wars. Black people were not fighting other black people in WW2, or Korea, or Vietnam, or Iraq. August 20, 2015, 01:26:21 PM
Statistically, poor people are most likely to be violent. Statistically, black people are a lot more likely to be poor than white people.
Hows about them statistics?
Except that doesn't explain the phenomenon of black crime. Hispanics are a larger minority group than blacks and have a similar percentage of their population living below the poverty line, and are actually more likely to drop out of high school and not graduate college than blacks, yet they commit a fraction of the violent crime that blacks commit. The next excuse thrown out would be "racism", yet blacks were not as violent 50 years ago when there was much more racism against them to deal with. Hows about them statistics?
August 20, 2015, 01:25:20 PM
It is endemic to the black culture as a whole.
There is no such thing as black culture. Or any racial culture at all.If you're talking about American blacks specifically. It's only endemic among the poor populations specifically.
August 20, 2015, 01:24:32 PM
It seems to be accepted by the black communities.
No it isn't.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/black_community_is_concerned_with_black_on_black_crime_suggesting_otherwise.html
August 20, 2015, 01:22:38 PM
According to who?
Didn't check those stats did you. August 20, 2015, 01:21:35 PM
I am saying it is a socio-economic cause, not a racial cause.
If you are saying black people are violent, I would point out that most wars in human history have not been waged by black people. Especially in the last few centuries. Black people, as a race, tend to be on the receiving end of violence.
Mostly from other blacks. If you are saying black people are violent, I would point out that most wars in human history have not been waged by black people. Especially in the last few centuries. Black people, as a race, tend to be on the receiving end of violence.
August 20, 2015, 01:20:24 PM
The implication is there for all to see... Perhaps stop projecting so hard.
Racists always have to rely on "implications", because they never have actual facts on their side. August 20, 2015, 01:19:45 PM
Sure its faulty logic as you discussed "white racists" and not "racists".
Because it is only white racists that are talking about this right now. Non-white racists exist, but they not the ones in this thread.
August 20, 2015, 01:18:09 PM
So what? The reverse has happened as well. What exactly is it supposed to prove?
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-28/news/0408280150_1_attack-lake-county-jail-civil
It seems to be accepted by the black communities. Never any outrage or call for justice. It's laughed at and cheered in most black communities. There are whole web sites about this type of crap. Games created around these racist BS. Where is Al Sharpton? Where is Obama saying if he had a son? Where are the liberals calling for race based juvenile attacks? This was a race base hate crime. Period. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-28/news/0408280150_1_attack-lake-county-jail-civil
August 20, 2015, 01:16:08 PM
Are you saying that the black race didn't do this?
I am saying it is a socio-economic cause, not a racial cause.If you are saying black people are violent, I would point out that most wars in human history have not been waged by black people. Especially in the last few centuries. Black people, as a race, tend to be on the receiving end of violence.
August 20, 2015, 01:15:17 PM
By percentage of their respective populations, yes.
Has not proven faulty so far.
I agree you're assumptions are wrong, yes.
According to who?
Sure its faulty logic as you discussed "white racists" and not "racists". The implication is there for all to see... Perhaps stop projecting so hard.
August 20, 2015, 01:14:04 PM
The US Census declared that in 2010 15.1% of the general population lived in poverty:
9.9% of all white persons
12.1% of all Asian persons
26.6% of all Hispanic persons (of any race)
28.4% of all black persons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States#Poverty_and_race.2Fethnicity
9.9% of all white persons
12.1% of all Asian persons
26.6% of all Hispanic persons (of any race)
28.4% of all black persons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States#Poverty_and_race.2Fethnicity
August 20, 2015, 01:13:30 PM
Question, Are there more poor blacks or more poor whites in America?
By percentage of their respective populations, yes.
Use your own logic then. You will see how faulty it is.
Has not proven faulty so far.
So then you agree.
I agree you're assumptions are wrong, yes.
It is endemic to the black culture as a whole.
According to who?
August 20, 2015, 01:09:06 PM
So what? The reverse has happened as well. What exactly is it supposed to prove?
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-28/news/0408280150_1_attack-lake-county-jail-civil
It is endemic to the black culture as a whole. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-28/news/0408280150_1_attack-lake-county-jail-civil
August 20, 2015, 01:08:05 PM
I'm confused as to why the other white kids sat around and watched. Perhaps afraid that they may have been shot by these thugs. I admit that I laughed at how hard the black boy in the wife beater punched the white guy in the chest. The black boy actually pushed himself backwards a little. Freaking wimpy ass cowards.
August 20, 2015, 01:07:00 PM
There is no double standard.
White racists are judged by their ideology. Not by the color of their skin.
White racists like to think that "white people" and "white racists" are the same thing. But they are not. One group is distinct and separate from the other.
Use your own logic then. You will see how faulty it is. White racists are judged by their ideology. Not by the color of their skin.
White racists like to think that "white people" and "white racists" are the same thing. But they are not. One group is distinct and separate from the other.
August 20, 2015, 01:05:50 PM
Uh huh
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/black_community_is_concerned_with_black_on_black_crime_suggesting_otherwise.html
Only racists view crime through a racial lens. For the rest of us, this is simply "violent crime". If the victim was a black girl, it would be no more or less despicable.
So then you agree. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/black_community_is_concerned_with_black_on_black_crime_suggesting_otherwise.html
Only racists view crime through a racial lens. For the rest of us, this is simply "violent crime". If the victim was a black girl, it would be no more or less despicable.
August 20, 2015, 01:04:59 PM
These kids should be forced into a tolerance program. Their homes should be visited by child protection with regular visits.
I am ok with that.The OP is trying to imply this is something that is endemic to black people as a whole.
August 20, 2015, 01:04:13 PM
But it wasn't a black child. Several blacks on a white child.
So what? The reverse has happened as well. What exactly is it supposed to prove?http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-28/news/0408280150_1_attack-lake-county-jail-civil
August 20, 2015, 01:02:05 PM
Uh huh
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/black_community_is_concerned_with_black_on_black_crime_suggesting_otherwise.html
Only racists view crime through a racial lens. For the rest of us, this is simply "violent crime". If the victim was a black girl, it would be no more or less despicable.
Question, Are there more poor blacks or more poor whites in America? http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/black_community_is_concerned_with_black_on_black_crime_suggesting_otherwise.html
Only racists view crime through a racial lens. For the rest of us, this is simply "violent crime". If the victim was a black girl, it would be no more or less despicable.
August 20, 2015, 01:01:21 PM
It depends on the answer to my question. Why are you people so afraid to just answer it directly?
You can't have it both ways. You can't complain that you are being judged unfairly by a few rogue individuals and then judge other groups in the exact same way. That is hypocrisy.
Are you saying that the black race didn't do this? You can't have it both ways. You can't complain that you are being judged unfairly by a few rogue individuals and then judge other groups in the exact same way. That is hypocrisy.
August 20, 2015, 12:59:55 PM
Seems i am judged by the actions of the long dead seems strange people are not judged by people that are alive. Why the double standard?
There is no double standard.White racists are judged by their ideology. Not by the color of their skin.
White racists like to think that "white people" and "white racists" are the same thing. But they are not. One group is distinct and separate from the other.
August 20, 2015, 12:59:04 PM
Uh huh
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/black_community_is_concerned_with_black_on_black_crime_suggesting_otherwise.html
Only racists view crime through a racial lens. For the rest of us, this is simply "violent crime". If the victim was a black girl, it would be no more or less despicable.
But it wasn't a black child. Several blacks on a white child. These kids should be forced into a tolerance program. Their homes should be visited by child protection with regular visits. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/black_community_is_concerned_with_black_on_black_crime_suggesting_otherwise.html
Only racists view crime through a racial lens. For the rest of us, this is simply "violent crime". If the victim was a black girl, it would be no more or less despicable.
August 20, 2015, 12:56:03 PM
It depends on the answer to my question. Why are you people so afraid to just answer it directly?
You can't have it both ways. You can't complain that you are being judged unfairly by a few rogue individuals and then judge other groups in the exact same way. That is hypocrisy.
August 20, 2015, 12:54:22 PM
Then maybe you should consider the statistics for violent crime.
Statistically, poor people are most likely to be violent. Statistically, black people are a lot more likely to be poor than white people.Hows about them statistics?
August 20, 2015, 12:53:38 PM
Where is the black "majority" coming out demanding this stop? Till then, tacit approval.
Uh huhhttp://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/black_community_is_concerned_with_black_on_black_crime_suggesting_otherwise.html
Only racists view crime through a racial lens. For the rest of us, this is simply "violent crime". If the victim was a black girl, it would be no more or less despicable.
August 20, 2015, 12:52:30 PM
It depends on the answer to my question. Why are you people so afraid to just answer it directly?
You can't have it both ways. You can't complain that you are being judged unfairly by a few rogue individuals and then judge other groups in the exact same way. That is hypocrisy.
Then maybe you should consider the statistics for violent crime...unless you have frequent news articles if white gangs attacking lone blacks.... You can't have it both ways. You can't complain that you are being judged unfairly by a few rogue individuals and then judge other groups in the exact same way. That is hypocrisy.
August 20, 2015, 12:49:36 PM
This was a racal attack. These boys should be treated as racist juveniles.
August 20, 2015, 12:48:24 PM
Lets try to be consistent with our beliefs.
I agree. So is the OP saying that we should judge races this way or not? You can't have it both ways.
Where is the black "majority" coming out demanding this stop? Till then, tacit approval. I agree. So is the OP saying that we should judge races this way or not? You can't have it both ways.
August 20, 2015, 12:47:08 PM
No more, no less than how Christians are judged by your ilk.
It depends on the answer to my question. Why are you people so afraid to just answer it directly?
You can't have it both ways. You can't complain that you are being judged unfairly by a few rogue individuals and then judge other groups in the exact same way. That is hypocrisy.
August 20, 2015, 12:46:12 PM
So are you saying it's ok to judge a race by the actions of a few of it's members? That seems to be what the OP is implying.
I just want to get it on the record either way.
No more, no less than how Christians are judged by your ilk.I just want to get it on the record either way.
We even?
August 20, 2015, 12:45:31 PM
The whole white race is judged by a few that owned slaves.
Not by me.Quote
Lets try to be consistent with our beliefs.
I agree. So is the OP saying that we should judge races this way or not? You can't have it both ways.
August 20, 2015, 12:44:21 PM
So are you saying it's ok to judge a race by the actions of a few of it's members? That seems to be what the OP is implying.
I just want to get it on the record either way.
The whole white race is judged by a few that owned slaves. Lets try to be consistent with our beliefs. I just want to get it on the record either way.
August 20, 2015, 12:43:42 PM
Just like the lady in church being punched from behind by black thugs that the liberal say doesn't happen and there isn't such a thing called the knock out game.
http://metro.co.uk/2015/08/19/two-teens-rob-and-punch-elderly-woman-in-a-church-5350190/
http://metro.co.uk/2015/08/19/two-teens-rob-and-punch-elderly-woman-in-a-church-5350190/
August 20, 2015, 12:41:48 PM
So are you saying it's ok to judge a race by the actions of a few of it's members? That seems to be what the OP is implying.
I just want to get it on the record either way.
Seems i am judged by the actions of the long dead seems strange people are not judged by people that are alive. Why the double standard? I just want to get it on the record either way.
August 20, 2015, 12:41:03 PM
So are you saying it's ok to judge a race by the actions of a few of it's members? That seems to be what the OP is implying.
I just want to get it on the record either way.
I just want to get it on the record either way.
August 20, 2015, 12:39:52 PM
Well... I can see why blacks can't fight one on one. White dude just kinda fell down on his own, probably to keep from getting kicked in the balls.
August 20, 2015, 12:38:57 PM
Someone on the left tell me again about all the racism....
(*)(*)(*)(*)ing animals.
(*)(*)(*)(*)ing animals.
August 20, 2015, 12:36:10 PM
More of what no one cares about.
August 20, 2015, 12:35:21 PM
No mom or dad around. Being raised by grandma. Poor white kids in America got nobody looking out for them.
August 20, 2015, 12:34:43 PM
Another one.
August 20, 2015, 12:33:50 PM
Hands Up... Fire Away
August 20, 2015, 12:32:51 PM
What's new about this. Just go on liveleak and you'll see video after video after video of what's seriously wrong with black way of life.
But they'll just keep blaming it on oppression from the whitey.....
But they'll just keep blaming it on oppression from the whitey.....
August 20, 2015, 12:32:19 PM
It is pretty nauseating...
August 20, 2015, 12:32:00 PM
In many if not most parts of the country this would be "typical" behavior. Nothing like low IQ, poor impulse control and a lack of future time orientation.
August 20, 2015, 12:30:44 PM
VIDEO: Pack Of Black Thugs Surround White 13-Year-Old… It Does Not End Well
A group of black teens brutally beat up a white 13-year-old in a racially-charged incident that had six of the teens facing possible assault charges.
To make matters worse, the teens were caught because of video taken by another teen who had been threatened by the group.
The incident happened in Norwood, Ohio, outside of the Holy Trinity Church festival. The teens in question obviously weren’t too interested in the religious aspect of the occasion, however, and soon surrounded a white 13-year-old with the intention of duking it out.
The group was discussing which one would hit him first before a sucker punch from a teen standing behind the victim settled the question. He was then on the ground, getting pummeled by punches and kicks, before the teens noticed adult intervention and ran away like the cowards they obviously are.
The victim decided that he wasn’t going to tell anyone about the beating he received. However, the video leaked on line and the boy’s grandmother, Mary Baker, took him to a doctor.
http://conservativetribune.com/black-thugs-surround-white/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=TPNNPages&utm_content=2015-08-19
More of the same...one kind of guys have to gang up on people? (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)-ass cowards, that's what kind. Notice the punk in charge wouldn't fight one on one, and the 1st thug to attack, strikes from BEHIND the single victim:
A group of black teens brutally beat up a white 13-year-old in a racially-charged incident that had six of the teens facing possible assault charges.
To make matters worse, the teens were caught because of video taken by another teen who had been threatened by the group.
The incident happened in Norwood, Ohio, outside of the Holy Trinity Church festival. The teens in question obviously weren’t too interested in the religious aspect of the occasion, however, and soon surrounded a white 13-year-old with the intention of duking it out.
The group was discussing which one would hit him first before a sucker punch from a teen standing behind the victim settled the question. He was then on the ground, getting pummeled by punches and kicks, before the teens noticed adult intervention and ran away like the cowards they obviously are.
The victim decided that he wasn’t going to tell anyone about the beating he received. However, the video leaked on line and the boy’s grandmother, Mary Baker, took him to a doctor.
http://conservativetribune.com/black-thugs-surround-white/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=TPNNPages&utm_content=2015-08-19
More of the same...one kind of guys have to gang up on people? (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)-ass cowards, that's what kind. Notice the punk in charge wouldn't fight one on one, and the 1st thug to attack, strikes from BEHIND the single victim:
Jump to: