Vod just left negative feedback for iCEBREAKER after he left Vod negative rating

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 08, 2015, 05:22:42 AM

Quote from: BadBear on January 08, 2015, 04:48:53 AM

Cliché.png

Yep, everything is a joke or a "conspiracy" when it comes to those in power here being accountable, yet when some one else breaks the rules...

In fairness to BadBear, I understand why he'd want to deflect rather than respond to this post, in which I politely cut him a couple of new assholes:

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 10:31:16 AM

Quote from: BadBear on January 07, 2015, 09:15:18 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 09:03:40 AM

Vod is just being a dick, not making an honest accusation that he could reasonably believe to be true.

So are you to be fair. You troll a lot, this looks like more of the same. Do you feel that you can leave Vod feedback, but he isn't allowed to do the same?

To be fair, I'm not on the default trust list. Nor did I make a dishonest accusation that I could not reasonably believe to be true.

The point was made (and enforced) in the TECSHARE imbroglio that default trust list members are held to a much higher standard than Joe Sixpost.

If Vod wasn't on the default trust list, I wouldn't GAS about his feedback.

Also, I've removed the feedback to which he originally objected. At the time I left it, I wasn't aware TECSHARE had been removed from default trust.

And yes, I troll a lot. But that's all in good fun, and I don't make irrefutable weasel accusations like "possibly hacked account" from a position of authority.

Plus, at least one other person who does not troll a lot (Quickseller) has stated that he finds Vod's behavior reprehensible and unacceptable.

Thanks for looking into this matter. Please reconsider your opinion, minus the false equivalence and ad hom.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: BadBear on January 08, 2015, 04:48:53 AM

Yep, everything is a joke or a "conspiracy" when it comes to those in power here being accountable, yet when some one else breaks the rules...

In reality this is not at all a joke. People spend YEARS of effort to build reputations in this community, and the staff and their protected minions just exploit the honest practices of these users by using their reputation as leverage to shut them up for pointing this out.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: BadBear on January 08, 2015, 04:48:53 AM

OK we get it.

Default trust list members are held to rigorously high standards and promptly removed if they abuse their position.

Unless their name is Vod.

/thread

BadBear

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1128

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: Tomatocage on January 07, 2015, 03:23:52 PM

IMHO everybody participating in the practice of leaving negative Trust in retaliation should cease this immediately. This is not what the Trust system is for, and doing so only diminishes the value of our ratings. Also we should go back and audit our Trust ratings periodically so that only those who are legitimately untrustworthy (ie. they've been proven to be scammers or walk/talk like a scammer and want you to send first without escrow, etc) remain with negative Trust. Finally, Trust ratings should not be set in stone. If someone gets lit red because of a loan default, but then eventually pays it back, I feel that the negative rating should be removed. Gotta keep in mind that everybody has their own life and their own life issues to deal with, and sometimes shit happens. And yes, I realize I should probably do a better job of heeding my own advice.

While I don't agree with the practice of self proclaimed "scambusters" running around telling people to respect their authoritah, or the practice in general, because IMO it is minimally effective and often counter productive (scammers return in minutes, honest users caught in it probably never return), out of all the people engaging in a proactive attempt to stop scammers you would seem to be the only one that really honors the standards they claim to keep. IMO you are quite responsible about how you leave trust in the vast majority of cases.

Quote from: BadBear on January 08, 2015, 02:20:28 AM

Quote from: Lethn on January 07, 2015, 04:00:11 PM

It was only a matter of time before something like this ended up happening, especially with the fact on this forum we conduct real deals, I hope that the moderators will have the sense not to give in to this bullshit and drastically change the rules or ban anyone for that matter just because a few morons are screaming the loudest. The people bitching about Vod even if they are correct are counting on you to overreact and start banning people left and right, then slowly, they'll get support to try and take over the forum or try and get a good portion of the community to leave.

I've seen this kind of crap before and it's always something completely pointless that starts it.

Can't please everybody, and if you try you'll just end up pleasing nobody.

What I don't think staff realize is that their iron fisted punishments for the general public, and their general silence when someone in their clique breaks the rules, sews a lot of malcontent and erodes their own authority. When those in charge do not follow rule of law, no one respects rule of law any more, and what has been happening around here lately is a symptom of that.

BadBear

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1128

Quote from: Lethn on January 07, 2015, 04:00:11 PM

It was only a matter of time before something like this ended up happening, especially with the fact on this forum we conduct real deals, I hope that the moderators will have the sense not to give in to this bullshit and drastically change the rules or ban anyone for that matter just because a few morons are screaming the loudest. The people bitching about Vod even if they are correct are counting on you to overreact and start banning people left and right, then slowly, they'll get support to try and take over the forum or try and get a good portion of the community to leave.

I've seen this kind of crap before and it's always something completely pointless that starts it.

Can't please everybody, and if you try you'll just end up pleasing nobody.

takagari

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

That wasn't actually sarcasm, but I'm glad you at least got the point that it wasn't a serious statement.

Vortex20000

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

sucker got hacked and screwed --Toad

Quote from: takagari on January 07, 2015, 02:53:17 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 02:49:51 AM

Hmmm, I would say this is probably not appropriate. He claims that it is a possibly hacked account, however his password was not changed in the last 30 days.

I think that Icebreaker's trust left for Vod is probably a misunderstanding of the entire situation, however he is entitled to his opinion about Vod's left feedback for TECHSHARE.

I think Vod should remove his trust for Icebreaker as this is more of an example of him trying to silence critics.

I would say this is somewhat of an example of leaving trust because of "trust abuse" and anyone who leaves those kinds of reports should not have any of their trust reports relied upon

You've not changed yours in 30 days, so your password could be compromised.
Therefor shall we all leave negative feedback on your trust. You could very well be a hacked account :O

Constantly posts BS because he is a sore dolt. Honest discussion is one thing, but sarcasm goes too far. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Vod on January 07, 2015, 06:18:16 PM

I'm glad to read his account wasn't hacked. I've removed my trust warning.

Should still leave a neutral quoting his rating on your "wall" with a reference thread link to one of the threads TECSHARE made in Meta, so he can read the whole story...

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

I'm glad to read his account wasn't hacked. I've removed my trust warning.

takagari

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Lethn on January 07, 2015, 04:00:11 PM

It was only a matter of time before something like this ended up happening, especially with the fact on this forum we conduct real deals, I hope that the moderators will have the sense not to give in to this bullshit and drastically change the rules or ban anyone for that matter just because a few morons are screaming the loudest. The people bitching about Vod even if they are correct are counting on you to overreact and start banning people left and right, then slowly, they'll get support to try and take over the forum or try and get a good portion of the community to leave.

I've seen this kind of crap before and it's always something completely pointless that starts it.

no,
I'd just like the negative mark taken off my rating. Or vod removed from default trust.
But I can see how that seems like a forum take over.

Lethn

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1000

It was only a matter of time before something like this ended up happening, especially with the fact on this forum we conduct real deals, I hope that the moderators will have the sense not to give in to this bullshit and drastically change the rules or ban anyone for that matter just because a few morons are screaming the loudest. The people bitching about Vod even if they are correct are counting on you to overreact and start banning people left and right, then slowly, they'll get support to try and take over the forum or try and get a good portion of the community to leave.

I've seen this kind of crap before and it's always something completely pointless that starts it.

DiamondCardz

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1118

Quote from: Tomatocage on January 07, 2015, 03:23:52 PM

IMHO everybody participating in the practice of leaving negative Trust in retaliation should cease this immediately. This is not what the Trust system is for, and doing so only diminishes the value of our ratings. Also we should go back and audit our Trust ratings periodically so that only those who are legitimately untrustworthy (ie. they've been proven to be scammers or walk/talk like a scammer and want you to send first without escrow, etc) remain with negative Trust. Finally, Trust ratings should not be set in stone. If someone gets lit red because of a loan default, but then eventually pays it back, I feel that the negative rating should be removed. Gotta keep in mind that everybody has their own life and their own life issues to deal with, and sometimes shit happens. And yes, I realize I should probably do a better job of heeding my own advice.

Thank you. No more "he started it" bullshit, please. Retaliating to negative feedback with a trust war is absolutely childish. PM each other and sort it out like real people! I do audit my own trust ratings every once in an odd while, and usually remove a good amount of negatives (and positives, sometimes). Trust wars make both sides look ridiculous and makes them both even more steady with their ratings. No-one gets anywhere - if anything, we take steps backward.

MrTeal

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Tomatocage on January 07, 2015, 03:23:52 PM

IMHO everybody participating in the practice of leaving negative Trust in retaliation should cease this immediately. This is not what the Trust system is for, and doing so only diminishes the value of our ratings. Also we should go back and audit our Trust ratings periodically so that only those who are legitimately untrustworthy (ie. they've been proven to be scammers or walk/talk like a scammer and want you to send first without escrow, etc) remain with negative Trust. Finally, Trust ratings should not be set in stone. If someone gets lit red because of a loan default, but then eventually pays it back, I feel that the negative rating should be removed. Gotta keep in mind that everybody has their own life and their own life issues to deal with, and sometimes shit happens. And yes, I realize I should probably do a better job of heeding my own advice.

It'd be nice to be able to modify a feedback instead of just delete it. I don't like the idea of just removing negative trust since people should know what has gone on in the past, but in your example it would be nice to just switch the negative to a neutral while leaving the reference link and an edited comment in place. You can always delete and repost it, but that's another couple steps that need to be done.

Tomatocage

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1222

brb keeping up with the Kardashians

IMHO everybody participating in the practice of leaving negative Trust in retaliation should cease this immediately. This is not what the Trust system is for, and doing so only diminishes the value of our ratings. Also we should go back and audit our Trust ratings periodically so that only those who are legitimately untrustworthy (ie. they've been proven to be scammers or walk/talk like a scammer and want you to send first without escrow, etc) remain with negative Trust. Finally, Trust ratings should not be set in stone. If someone gets lit red because of a loan default, but then eventually pays it back, I feel that the negative rating should be removed. Gotta keep in mind that everybody has their own life and their own life issues to deal with, and sometimes shit happens. And yes, I realize I should probably do a better job of heeding my own advice.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: rugrats on January 07, 2015, 02:48:34 PM

Whoa. This changes everything. If we go by Theymos' standard, a number of people on the DefaultList and Depth Level 2 is liable to be penalized.

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 07, 2015, 10:10:48 AM

For the record, theymos removed me from DefaultTrust when I gave negative trust to gweedo, who made a number of very misleading attack threads on me and my businesses. Here's the PM I received from theymos:

Quote

You have just been sent a personal message by theymos on Bitcoin Forum.

IMPORTANT: Remember, this is just a notification. Please do not reply to this email.

The message they sent you was:

IMO your ratings of gweedo are inappropriate. His thread title is inaccurate and overly harsh, but this doesn't imply that he's untrustworthy. I feel that allowing your ratings to exist in the default trust network would be counter to the forum's mission of free speech, so I've removed you from the default trust network.

Did the forum's mission of free speech disappear?!

Magically rules and standards don't apply when it means the staff have to be responsible for obeying rules they have no problem enforcing upon others.

rugrats

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 250

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

Whoa. This changes everything. If we go by Theymos' standard, a number of people on the DefaultList and Depth Level 2 is liable to be penalized.

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 07, 2015, 10:10:48 AM

For the record, theymos removed me from DefaultTrust when I gave negative trust to gweedo, who made a number of very misleading attack threads on me and my businesses. Here's the PM I received from theymos:

Quote

You have just been sent a personal message by theymos on Bitcoin Forum.

IMPORTANT: Remember, this is just a notification. Please do not reply to this email.

The message they sent you was:

IMO your ratings of gweedo are inappropriate. His thread title is inaccurate and overly harsh, but this doesn't imply that he's untrustworthy. I feel that allowing your ratings to exist in the default trust network would be counter to the forum's mission of free speech, so I've removed you from the default trust network.

Did the forum's mission of free speech disappear?!

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: hashie on January 07, 2015, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 10:31:16 AM

Also, I've removed the feedback to which he originally objected.

You shouldn't have!

Although made in good faith, it was partially factually incorrect w/r/t TECSHARE's default trust status.

You are welcome to replace it... Wink

hashie

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 100

DATABLOCKCHAIN.IO SALE IS LIVE | MVP @ DBC.IO

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 10:31:16 AM

Also, I've removed the feedback to which he originally objected.

You shouldn't have!

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: BadBear on January 07, 2015, 09:15:18 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 09:03:40 AM

Vod is just being a dick, not making an honest accusation that he could reasonably believe to be true.

So are you to be fair. You troll a lot, this looks like more of the same. Do you feel that you can leave Vod feedback, but he isn't allowed to do the same?

To be fair, I'm not on the default trust list. Nor did I make a dishonest accusation that I could not reasonably believe to be true.

The point was made (and enforced) in the TECSHARE imbroglio that default trust list members are held to a much higher standard than Joe Sixpost.

If Vod wasn't on the default trust list, I wouldn't GAS about his feedback.

Also, I've removed the feedback to which he originally objected. At the time I left it, I wasn't aware TECSHARE had been removed from default trust.

And yes, I troll a lot. But that's all in good fun, and I don't make irrefutable weasel accusations like "possibly hacked account" from a position of authority.

Plus, at least one other person who does not troll a lot (Quickseller) has stated that he finds Vod's behavior reprehensible and unacceptable.

Thanks for looking into this matter. Please reconsider your opinion, minus the false equivalence and ad hom.

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

Quote from: BadBear on January 07, 2015, 09:15:18 AM

So are you to be fair. You troll a lot, this looks like more of the same. Do you feel that you can leave Vod feedback, but he isn't allowed to do the same?

The difference is that Vod is currently in the default trust network. When I was in default trust, there was an expectation that you leave negative feedback only for untrustworthy actions, not leave negative feedback as retribution, or 'tit for tat', or as a punitive measure.

People who have done so at one time or another (me, TECSHARE, etc) quickly got removed from DefaultTrust. I fail to see how the circumstances are different in this case. Sure, Vod should be given some consideration for the tagging work he's done, but that consideration should be for good-faith mistakes, not intentional bad-faith actions.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 10:05:02 AM

Quote

the burden is on the accuser

I agree.

Quote

how can I prove my account hasn't been "possibly hacked" Huh

you could possibly give someone like tomatocage access to your account to see the PM with your address that you could later sign a message with.

Is this somewhat of an invasion of privacy? Yes.

Would I personally do this to prove my account was not hacked? No.

Of course you wouldn't. It's asinine to expect the accused to prove themselves innocent.

It's asinine because you can't prove innocence, only demonstrate guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Vod could just say that my private key has been "possibly" compromised along with my account, and I'd be back to square one.

You can't refute a slippery weasel claim like "possibly."

Over the past 3+ years, I've had multiple successful transactions with several people on this board, but none of those count in my favor.

Vod's baseless, evidence-free accusation carries more weight, according to our broken default trust system. Roll Eyes

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

For the record, theymos removed me from DefaultTrust when I gave negative trust to gweedo, who made a number of very misleading attack threads on me and my businesses. Here's the PM I received from theymos:

Quote

You have just been sent a personal message by theymos on Bitcoin Forum.

IMPORTANT: Remember, this is just a notification. Please do not reply to this email.

The message they sent you was:

IMO your ratings of gweedo are inappropriate. His thread title is inaccurate and overly harsh, but this doesn't imply that he's untrustworthy. I feel that allowing your ratings to exist in the default trust network would be counter to the forum's mission of free speech, so I've removed you from the default trust network.

Did the forum's mission of free speech disappear?!

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote

the burden is on the accuser

I agree.

Quote

how can I prove my account hasn't been "possibly hacked" Huh

you could possibly give someone like tomatocage access to your account to see the PM with your address that you could later sign a message with.

Is this somewhat of an invasion of privacy? Yes.

Would I personally do this to prove my account was not hacked? No.

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

I still don't see how any of vod's recent trust ratings fits with "You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer."

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 09:43:41 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 09:21:42 AM

You're assuming I've publicly posted an address which could be used to sign a message.

I haven't, except in PMs.

The recipients of those PMs (Carnth, DeadTerra and Friedcat) have better things to do than referee Vod's slap fights.

Even if they didn't, Vod could still say my private key was "possibly hacked" because it's not a refutable claim.

Given these facts, do you see an alternative besides "hate campaign?" Angry

Maybe Thermos or BadBear will hold Vod to the same high standard they held TECSHARE, and remove him from default trust because of his demonstrated abusive malfeasance.

i think that is the easiest solution. Weather or not you want to try to prove your self this way is ultimately up to you.

How can I prove that my account hasn't been "possibly hacked?" Huh

As I've already tried to explain, it is not a refutable claim, short of metaphysical certainty. Tongue

I cannot prove my account is impossible to hack, although common sense indicates very few hackers would be capable of emulating my distinctive writing style.

The burden of proof is on the accuser, not he accused.

Vod made the accusation, so let him prove it.

Your suggestion that I prove myself innocent is obnoxious and contrary to logic. Sorry, nothing personal. I know you are trying to help, but IMO you are doing it wrong.

Maybe Thermos could send a "Have you been hacked?" email to my account's address. That wouldn't prove anything, but perhaps be Good Enough.

takagari

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dogie on January 07, 2015, 09:44:38 AM

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 07, 2015, 05:19:49 AM

Quote from: dogie on January 07, 2015, 05:17:16 AM

Anyway.... can people stop prodding the Vod please, someone's going to lose an arm sooner or later.

So you're okay with people being hit with negative trust if they criticize Vod in a meaningful way, for something that he should be criticized for?

I'm not condoning or affirming any action he has taken, its just a bit tiring when there's 6 different VOD threads in meta.

Than maybe something should be said or done.
labeling people scammers because you disagree or they disagree with you is an abuse of the system and an abusive use of power

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 07, 2015, 05:19:49 AM

Quote from: dogie on January 07, 2015, 05:17:16 AM

Anyway.... can people stop prodding the Vod please, someone's going to lose an arm sooner or later.

So you're okay with people being hit with negative trust if they criticize Vod in a meaningful way, for something that he should be criticized for?

I'm not condoning or affirming any action he has taken, its just a bit tiring when there's 6 different VOD threads in meta.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 09:21:42 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 09:08:35 AM

I think the easiest solution would be a signed message. I agree that the trust should really not have ever been left.

It is up to you but whatever you do I would suggest not starting any kind of hate campaign.

You're assuming I've publicly posted an address which could be used to sign a message.

I haven't, except in PMs.

The recipients of those PMs (Carnth, DeadTerra and Friedcat) have better things to do than referee Vod's slap fights.

Even if they didn't, Vod could still say my private key was "possibly hacked" because it's not a refutable claim.

Given these facts, do you see an alternative besides "hate campaign?" Angry

Maybe Thermos or BadBear will hold Vod to the same high standard they held TECSHARE, and remove him from default trust because of his demonstrated abusive malfeasance.

i think that is the easiest solution. Weather or not you want to try to prove your self this way is ultimately up to you.

takagari

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

So suddenly icebreaker needs to prove himself. Just like u had to fight to prove u was Canadian.

BBecause some child with a god complex is abusing a system?
It's pretty clear what the system for. It says it right beside that little point you click.

Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.

Not because your but hurt for being picked on or questioned

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 09:08:35 AM

I think the easiest solution would be a signed message. I agree that the trust should really not have ever been left.

It is up to you but whatever you do I would suggest not starting any kind of hate campaign.

You're assuming I've publicly posted an address which could be used to sign a message.

I haven't, except in PMs.

The recipients of those PMs (Carnth, DeadTerra and Friedcat) have better things to do than referee Vod's slap fights.

Even if they didn't, Vod could still say my private key was "possibly hacked" because it's not a refutable claim.

Given these facts, do you see an alternative besides "hate campaign?" Angry

Maybe Thermos or BadBear will hold Vod to the same high standard they held TECSHARE, and remove him from default trust because of his demonstrated abusive malfeasance.

BadBear

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1128

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 09:03:40 AM

Vod is just being a dick, not making an honest accusation that he could reasonably believe to be true.

So are you to be fair. You troll a lot, this looks like more of the same. Do you feel that you can leave Vod feedback, but he isn't allowed to do the same?

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

I think the easiest solution would be a signed message. I agree that the trust should really not have ever been left.

It is up to you but whatever you do I would suggest not starting any kind of hate campaign.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 08:55:47 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 08:43:05 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 02:49:51 AM

Hmmm, I would say this is probably not appropriate. He claims that it is a possibly hacked account, however his password was not changed in the last 30 days.

I think that Icebreaker's trust left for Vod is probably a misunderstanding of the entire situation, however he is entitled to his opinion about Vod's left feedback for TECHSHARE.

I think Vod should remove his trust for Icebreaker as this is more of an example of him trying to silence critics.

I would say this is somewhat of an example of leaving trust because of "trust abuse" and anyone who leaves those kinds of reports should not have any of their trust reports relied upon

My account has not been hacked.

I've been here longer than Vod.

This is clearly an abuse of his default trust, which isn't supposed to be used for petulant tit-for-tat retaliation.

Like I said it is probably not appropiate. If you can provide a signed message from an address from an old unedited post then it would squash any hacking claim and if he wants to remain reputable then he will need to remove the trust. Although I do not think that should be necessary.

I do think this is essentially leaving trust because they are engaging in "trust abuse" and any trust left for this reason makes the person's trust left be unreliable

Vod didn't make the refutable claim that my account was in fact hacked. He used the slimey, non-refutable "possibly hacked account" wording instead.

Every account on this board is "possibly hacked." Even if I signed an old address, he could still weasel around that by claiming my private key was also "possibly hacked."

Look at my recent posts; they are written with the same pompous bombast they always have been. Cheesy

Vod is just being a dick, not making an honest accusation that he could reasonably believe to be true.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on January 07, 2015, 08:43:05 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 02:49:51 AM

Hmmm, I would say this is probably not appropriate. He claims that it is a possibly hacked account, however his password was not changed in the last 30 days.

I think that Icebreaker's trust left for Vod is probably a misunderstanding of the entire situation, however he is entitled to his opinion about Vod's left feedback for TECHSHARE.

I think Vod should remove his trust for Icebreaker as this is more of an example of him trying to silence critics.

I would say this is somewhat of an example of leaving trust because of "trust abuse" and anyone who leaves those kinds of reports should not have any of their trust reports relied upon

My account has not been hacked.

I've been here longer than Vod.

This is clearly an abuse of his default trust, which isn't supposed to be used for petulant tit-for-tat retaliation.

Like I said it is probably not appropiate. If you can provide a signed message from an address from an old unedited post then it would squash any hacking claim and if he wants to remain reputable then he will need to remove the trust. Although I do not think that should be necessary.

I do think this is essentially leaving trust because they are engaging in "trust abuse" and any trust left for this reason makes the person's trust left be unreliable

Beastlymac

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 501

Miner Setup And Reviews. WASP Rep.

not that i am commenting on this situation but on the situation of trust as a whole. I think something needs to be done about trust that is clearly wrong and can be proven wrong. I think that this hinders the community moving forward and needs to be changed.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 02:49:51 AM

Hmmm, I would say this is probably not appropriate. He claims that it is a possibly hacked account, however his password was not changed in the last 30 days.

I think that Icebreaker's trust left for Vod is probably a misunderstanding of the entire situation, however he is entitled to his opinion about Vod's left feedback for TECHSHARE.

I think Vod should remove his trust for Icebreaker as this is more of an example of him trying to silence critics.

I would say this is somewhat of an example of leaving trust because of "trust abuse" and anyone who leaves those kinds of reports should not have any of their trust reports relied upon

My account has not been hacked.

I've been here longer than Vod.

This is clearly an abuse of his default trust, which isn't supposed to be used for petulant tit-for-tat retaliation.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: dogie on January 07, 2015, 05:17:16 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 07, 2015, 04:14:44 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I responded to the "mocking" statement earlier above.

Lying requires intent to mislead.

Making a statement that someone may interpret differently, is not lying when there is no intent to mislead.

Spoken like a lawyer LOL

~BCX~

Or, by negligence. If I have a duty to make my instructions clear (ie by saying the word fo-our and not four), its still my fault if its interpreted incorrectly. Anyway.... can people stop prodding the Vod please, someone's going to lose an arm sooner or later.

Have you considered that maybe VOD is the one prodding too many people?

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

Quote from: dogie on January 07, 2015, 05:17:16 AM

Anyway.... can people stop prodding the Vod please, someone's going to lose an arm sooner or later.

So you're okay with people being hit with negative trust if they criticize Vod in a meaningful way, for something that he should be criticized for?

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 07, 2015, 04:14:44 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I responded to the "mocking" statement earlier above.

Lying requires intent to mislead.

Making a statement that someone may interpret differently, is not lying when there is no intent to mislead.

Spoken like a lawyer LOL

~BCX~

Or, by negligence. If I have a duty to make my instructions clear (ie by saying the word fo-our and not four), its still my fault if its interpreted incorrectly. Anyway.... can people stop prodding the Vod please, someone's going to lose an arm sooner or later.

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

Quote from: ?? on ??

Spoken like a lawyer LOL

That's because you choose to be disruptively pedantic instead of focusing on the point of this thread, which is this feedback being inappropriate.

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

Quote from: ?? on ??

I responded to the "mocking" statement earlier above.

Lying requires intent to mislead.

Making a statement that someone may interpret differently, is not lying when there is no intent to mislead.

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

Quote from: ?? on ??

Default Trust is not moderated.

Your removal because by the three people that had you on their list for being untrustworthy does not indicate moderation.

DefaultTrust is moderated. Feedback is not moderated.

This is the 5th time today you have misread a post by literally interpreting it, or interpreting it in some completely absurd way.

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 03:14:20 AM

Looking at the feedback that icebreaker left it looks like it matches what Vod left on TECHSHARE exactly (with the exception of who is being discussed). I do find it strange that he would leave the exact same trust rating like that.

So yes, mocking the feedback Vod left TECShARE.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 4046

Merit: 2732

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 02:49:51 AM

Hmmm, I would say this is probably not appropriate. He claims that it is a possibly hacked account, however his password was not changed in the last 30 days.

I think Vod should remove his trust for Icebreaker as this is more of an example of him trying to silence critics.

I would say this is somewhat of an example of leaving trust because of "trust abuse" and anyone who leaves those kinds of reports should not have any of their trust reports relied upon

Agreed. Vod isn't really helping the situation here and this is just going to add fuel to the fire and perpetuate this entire commotion.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 07, 2015, 03:09:58 AM

Quote from: redsn0w on January 07, 2015, 03:03:46 AM

I don't know what is this , but let us wait the new improvement of theymos. I understood that trust ratings are not moderated ,so it is not effective open a thread here.

...But default trust is moderated, and VODs actions here are relevant to his standing accusations of default trust abuse.

Default Trust is not moderated.

Your removal because by the three people that had you on their list for being untrustworthy does not indicate moderation.

Think about it, if they trusted you to act accordingly, you would still be there.

~BCX~

The Default trust list is moderated in the sense that theymos and those on it can remove and add people, but feedback left usually isn't. The trust list works by adding those who appear trustworthy and removing those that don't (or cannot handle the responsibility of being on there).

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Looking at the feedback that icebreaker left it looks like it matches what Vod left on TECHSHARE exactly (with the exception of who is being discussed). I do find it strange that he would leave the exact same trust rating like that.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: redsn0w on January 07, 2015, 03:03:46 AM

I don't know what is this , but let us wait the new improvement of theymos. I understood that trust ratings are not moderated ,so it is not effective open a thread here.

...But default trust is moderated, and VODs actions here are relevant to his standing accusations of default trust abuse.

redsn0w

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1043

#Free market

I don't know what is this , but let us wait the new improvement of theymos. I understood that trust ratings are not moderated ,so it is not effective open a thread here.

takagari

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Quickseller on January 07, 2015, 02:49:51 AM

Hmmm, I would say this is probably not appropriate. He claims that it is a possibly hacked account, however his password was not changed in the last 30 days.

I think that Icebreaker's trust left for Vod is probably a misunderstanding of the entire situation, however he is entitled to his opinion about Vod's left feedback for TECHSHARE.

I think Vod should remove his trust for Icebreaker as this is more of an example of him trying to silence critics.

I would say this is somewhat of an example of leaving trust because of "trust abuse" and anyone who leaves those kinds of reports should not have any of their trust reports relied upon

You've not changed yours in 30 days, so your password could be compromised.
Therefor shall we all leave negative feedback on your trust. You could very well be a hacked account :O

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Hmmm, I would say this is probably not appropriate. He claims that it is a possibly hacked account, however his password was not changed in the last 30 days.

I think that Icebreaker's trust left for Vod is probably a misunderstanding of the entire situation, however he is entitled to his opinion about Vod's left feedback for TECHSHARE.

I think Vod should remove his trust for Icebreaker as this is more of an example of him trying to silence critics.

I would say this is somewhat of an example of leaving trust because of "trust abuse" and anyone who leaves those kinds of reports should not have any of their trust reports relied upon

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hmm I'm going to take a wild guess here but probably because Vod hasn't posted any lies about Techshare and IS NOT trying to get him removed from the Default Trust since he was already removed.

Once again, you are missing the point entirely by reading a couple of words individually and literally.

Please re-read the thread, specially the 'This is clearly mocking the negative feedback Vod has left TECSHARE' part. iCEBREAKER is expressing the absurdity of Vod's negative feedback by copying it and applying it to Vod.

Please also read http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/parody and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire first.

takagari

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Lol, what a child.

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

iCEBREAKER recently left Vod the following feedback:

"Constantly posts lies about TECSHARE in an effort to have him removed from the default trust list. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis.

Not trustworthy."

(This is clearly mocking the negative feedback Vod has left TECSHARE).

In response, Vod has left negative feedback for iCEBREAKER:

"Possibly hacked account.

Posted the following feedback on my account: "Constantly posts lies about TECSHARE in an effort to have him removed from the default trust list. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis. Not trustworthy."

TECSHARE isn't on the default trust list. Not sure why this user would be lying about me in this way."

-------------

Vod, can you please explain how iCEBREAKER "lied" about you?

Topic: Vod just left negative feedback for iCEBREAKER after he left Vod negative rating (Read 3215 times)