Incident one:
Vod left a counter feedback for OG and seems like he is very concerned about risked BTC in positive feedback from users.
Just a friendly counter to the 500 BTC <....>
His logic is that:
"Risked BTC" is how much money you could have lost if the person you're rating had turned out to be a scammer. <== reference theymos post
https://archive.is/og5mW#selection-351.0-351.12Originally it was 1500 BTC negative rating but he seems convinced two members to remove their risked amount and updated the new rating with 500 risked BTC negative feedback.
Incident two:
TMAN left a negative feedback for OG, 110,000 risked BTC
https://archive.is/og5mW#selection-1397.0-1397.16But Vod has no headache here.
Conclusion: Although this risked BTC algorithm is not any more functional but question comes to mind that:
Why Vod finds problem in positive feedbacks left to a person who held 500 BTC for the forum and returned it when asked?
Additional: If a positive countered by a negative then Vod needs to counter the negative of TMAN with a positive feedback for OgNasty. Or Vod personally verified the tx of the 110,000 BTC deal in between TMAN and OgNasty?
Community inputs please also Vod, TMAN, OG, Thule, CH and The-One-Above-All all are welcome. I do not have a local rules LOL