Author

Topic: Voting algorithms (Read 1513 times)

jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
October 01, 2012, 01:11:23 AM
#6
I was going to suggest the Borda method (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda_count) but it seems your method is nearly identical. I agree it is the best out of what can be done.

That was one method I seriously considered. I especially liked that it was "non-democratic" in that someone winning a majority vote wouldn't necessarily win. But its tendency to pick "compromise" candidates isn't really what I want.

Yeah, that's why I like the one above more now. It makes a clear distinction between what's acceptable and what's unacceptable.
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
October 01, 2012, 01:08:43 AM
#5
I was going to suggest the Borda method (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda_count) but it seems your method is nearly identical. I agree it is the best out of what can be done.

That was one method I seriously considered. I especially liked that it was "non-democratic" in that someone winning a majority vote wouldn't necessarily win. But its tendency to pick "compromise" candidates isn't really what I want.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
October 01, 2012, 01:00:16 AM
#4
Looks good to me. 

As a stubborn old stickler who complains when language evolves, let me take this time to register a complaint in you use of the word "Democracy".  The namesake philosopher Democritus would not have supported this "voting for a representative" idea at all, he was more of a proponent of government by the people e.g. by using random selection as is done currently e.g. as jury duty. 



A random representative cycling out very often would be harder to control. I am for a Democritus democracy over what we have today.
legendary
Activity: 1264
Merit: 1008
October 01, 2012, 12:58:03 AM
#3
Looks good to me. 

As a stubborn old stickler who complains when language evolves, let me take this time to register a complaint in you use of the word "Democracy".  The namesake philosopher Democritus would not have supported this "voting for a representative" idea at all, he was more of a proponent of government by the people e.g. by using random selection as is done currently e.g. as jury duty. 

jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
October 01, 2012, 12:40:20 AM
#2
I was going to suggest the Borda method (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda_count) but it seems your method is nearly identical. I agree it is the best out of what can be done.
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
October 01, 2012, 12:33:58 AM
#1
I normally don't like democracy, but I recently decided that a vote was the best way to determine who should moderate the Russian section in addition to LZ. So, before coding the voting page, I did some reading on voting algorithms and ultimately decided on the Majority Judgement algorithm. Do you agree that this is the best voting algorithm, or do you prefer some other algorithm?
Jump to: