Author

Topic: Waiting for tag Moderator (Read 333 times)

full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 105
May 04, 2019, 10:14:23 AM
#10
Merit Receiver Bitcoin profile link: Here
Merit Sender Bitcoin profile link:
Here
At a glance I see this has nothing to do with alt accounts, Leonard2016 never post Persian language.

While mone ro is a Persian, so I think it's a natural thing and there are no restrictions, or wrong about shipping (Merit). natural thing for someone he wants.

Maybe you, fainted or cold when you see this one:



1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/madu-807240

2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=807240

112 Merit with only 9 posts is best example the Merit System will reward you if you are good enough. If he had been more active on this forum, it will be an easy task from him to grow up levels.
We need more people like "Madu" on this forum who really provide some valuable contributions.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 3645
Buy/Sell crypto at BestChange
May 04, 2019, 03:56:47 AM
#9
At a glance I see this has nothing to do with alt accounts, Leonard2016 never post Persian language.
It does not make a difference.
These are the possible reasons * from my point of view *: to pay the user for the translation or to thank the user.
As long as the situation does not include giving hundreds or thousands of Merits it will not be a situation you need to give negative trust.


I think that tagging may be appropriate in particularly obvious cases, or particularly egregious cases involving hundreds of merit points and several posts. But generally you should start out by assuming good faith, and only change that opinion as the evidence really piles up. Tagging someone immediately after an instance of apparently-inexplicable meriting is too trigger-happy IMO. Even if it is a case of illegitimate merit, even hundreds of illegitimate merit points are not much of a problem IMO, so you have to ask whether it's worthwhile to possibly make a mistake by tagging someone who is merely suspicious.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
May 04, 2019, 12:19:49 AM
#8
[...><...]
Yes, i know that. Trust:
Well, right now Joss24 not talking about it, what he suspects is between @mone and @ Leonard2016.
So the problem is not "the devil is always in the detail" But
"Real monsters. Ghosts are also real".

Friend, you don't need to always get hot quickly, because maybe, we just misunderstand, or draw conclusions too fast.

"Start with goals in mind."
copper member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1788
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
May 03, 2019, 05:29:29 PM
#7
At a glance I see this has nothing to do with alt accounts, Leonard2016 never post Persian language.

While mone ro is a Persian, so I think it's a natural thing and there are no restrictions, or wrong about shipping (Merit). natural thing for someone he wants.
Don't be too quick to judge, "the devil is always in the detail"

Leonard2016 has before been liked with certain accounts.
Fore example cryptobull3 isn't a regular poster in the persianlocal board but did try to translate  about article in Persian
reserving Persian translation if needed
my previous works
my website : jobkade.com
regards

This is an account that was proved to be connected to Leonard2016
So definitely, Leonard2016 is Persian
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 2191
Signature Space For Rent
May 03, 2019, 02:18:18 PM
#6
Merit sender already tagged from beginning, so ha has no fair of red tag. Although this is clear merit abuse but moderators can't take any action on such as case. DT's are not tagging also merit abuser without proper evidence. So receiver wouldn't get tag on that case. I don't know about other DT but I am not going to tag receiver. But if you have enough evidence that they are alt account then it would be consider for red tag.
copper member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1693
Top Crypto Casino
May 03, 2019, 11:14:40 AM
#5
Great effort but the information you provided is not conclusive enough to prove that the accounts are Alts and hence hard to say that it was some sort of merit abuse.
Unfortunately for your cause, i really doubt DT members will do anything to tag the persons involved.
They only usually tag out right Merit abuse.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
May 03, 2019, 10:25:08 AM
#4
Merit Receiver Bitcoin profile link: Here
Merit Sender Bitcoin profile link:
Here
At a glance I see this has nothing to do with alt accounts, Leonard2016 never post Persian language.

While mone ro is a Persian, so I think it's a natural thing and there are no restrictions, or wrong about shipping (Merit). natural thing for someone he wants.

Maybe you, fainted or cold when you see this one:



1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/madu-807240

2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=807240
sr. member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 314
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
May 03, 2019, 08:33:54 AM
#3
Why you created a new account just to report this one?
Well, that's a great notice by you, and if you just used your main account you might get commended for this job. But honestly as I can see, there's no merit being trade given back by account of the receiver to the sender, merit abuse might not be a right call, the merit might be too much but is still the decision of the DT. The sender already have a red trust for having an altaccount.
legendary
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1885
Metawin.com
May 03, 2019, 02:52:20 AM
#2
Good work on reporting the account but I doubt the moderators will take action on this even though they're part of the DT. I suggest you move this thread to the Reputation board( i'll also report it to the mods if you don't know how to move it) because usually the other DT members will handle this case they're the ones who tags several users for these kind of behavior.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
May 03, 2019, 02:47:23 AM
#1
A completely abuse of Merit  Huh Huh.  I think this as a completely abuse of merit and I think the Two accounts are belong to same person.
 I think this report will attract the Moderators and will take action against them.


Merit Receiver Bitcoin profile link: Here
Merit Sender Bitcoin profile link:
Here
Jump to: