Adaptive block sizes debunked:
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@anonymint/psadrvThat is a dire condemnation of BCH and BSV.
Funny. Shelby had been copying me in PM on most of the recent traffic, yet neglected to include me in this one. Whatevs.
Maximum 15 msgs daily limit reached. Not intended to exclude you. I am making a brief concerted effort here and now (soon to disappear again) to convince you that BSV and BCH are scams:
http://trilema.com/2015/if-you-go-on-a-bitcoin-fork-irrespective-which-scammer-proposes-it-you-will-lose-your-bitcoins/http://trilema.com/2016/to-the-dao-and-the-ethereum-community-fuck-you/That said, it is a reasonable point. However, it kind of flies in the face of the probability that Satoshi -- whomever he/she/they may be -- likely has ownership of something on the order of 1Million BTC, BCH, BSV, BTG, etc... Exercised or not, the option remains a locus of centralization.
The power-law distribution is inviolable, yet it doesn‘t logically follow that Satoshi would design a system that requires him to doxx himself, make himself culpable for unleashing a system that is going to be perceived as a huge threat to the nation-states eventually:
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@anonymint/ps65tghttps://steemit.com/bitcoin/@anonymint/secrets-of-bitcoin-s-dystopian-valuation-modelNor design the game theory such that his own stash (or anyone else’s) would require any obvious centralization to protect the immutability of the system. All those who think Core is not altcoin, are going to learn this the hard way by being impoverished.
Nevermind the fact the Shelby has from time to time reversed tack on things he was adamant were settled gospel.
As I learn. Bitcoin is like an onion, keeping peeling off layers of new understanding. So it was not designed by some programmer in his garage. Bitcoin is very, very deep:
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@zoidsoft/psa7we 
