Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19213. (Read 26608628 times)
February 23, 2016, 08:31:48 PM
Shhh... Stop FUDing, you're waking the bulls up.
February 23, 2016, 08:10:56 PM
Big blocktards troll fest round the clock... Who's paying?
It's a Green Beret op, involving a number of sleeper agents that hung around these fora for years. We "activated" when blocks started being regularly full.
To answer your question:
The checks say DoD
I heard rumors about GCHQ having a sister op, but can't confirm.
February 23, 2016, 08:03:37 PM
TA aside, i think it still looks good because the "conesens" looks like it'll hold up. I saw a comment from Gavin somewhere today saying somthing along the lines of "Classic will continue to be compatible with Core as they move forward with their plan", was i dreaming? idk.
I think a lot of poeple are thinking this consensus, isn't a consensus, because of a few loud morons ( ex Coinbase saying " we want 2MB and Then segwit , and not the other way around! ") which Makes it seem as tho this consensus will fall apart.
this is what this drop is about. but now it's over. now even these mistaken views have been priced in. I took advantage of the sellers today.
Core's consensus rules give loud morons veto power.
It is Bitcoin consensus rule you moron.
Neither Core nor Classic nor Blockstream nor Obama can do anything about it.
if it was Bitcoin consensus you wouldn't need to censor Bitcointalk, r/bitcoin, bitcoin.org and many other forums where developers discuss changing / keeping Core Consensus functional.
February 23, 2016, 08:00:49 PM
February 23, 2016, 07:56:44 PM
Big blocktards troll fest round the clock... Who's paying?
its a free service.
February 23, 2016, 07:54:19 PM
Big blocktards troll fest round the clock... Who's paying?
February 23, 2016, 07:52:20 PM
...
if i was bitcoins CEO
i'd tell you
i dont give a fuck how you do the second layer
if i was bitcoins CEO
i'd tell you
i dont give a fuck how you do the second layer
Yes you would, and that's how your company would go under. Because people will give as much of a f8ck about what their USD "sidechain" is backed with as they do about their current USD.
February 23, 2016, 07:52:09 PM
if i was bitcoins CEO
I'd sell all of you a "second layer solution"
but the second layer would be centralized.
I'd sell all of you a "second layer solution"
but the second layer would be centralized.
LN naturally gravitates to the hub and spoke model due to economic and convenience incentives...
tl;dr
You're late, highly technical minds beat you to the punch.
February 23, 2016, 07:48:57 PM
I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?
LN will be so confusing its like the mixing service was built in.
I think it's possible we're gonna need something like the lightning network eventually, but instead of a hardfork that would buy them more time to build it, they want small blocks so we have the incentive to build it. This is crazy. This is like robbing someone so they have the incentive to be more careful in the future, and trying to justify it as being in the victim's best interest.
if i was bitcoins CEO
I'd sell all of you a "second layer solution"
but the second layer would be centralized.
How about we use a sidechain for daily transactions, with exchanges acting as gateways. We can call the sidechain something like SpendingCoin, or... USD?
if i was bitcoins CEO
i'd tell you
i dont give a fuck how you do the second layer as long as its super simple to use, truly instant and free.
February 23, 2016, 07:46:31 PM
I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?
LN will be so confusing its like the mixing service was built in.
I think it's possible we're gonna need something like the lightning network eventually, but instead of a hardfork that would buy them more time to build it, they want small blocks so we have the incentive to build it. This is crazy. This is like robbing someone so they have the incentive to be more careful in the future, and trying to justify it as being in the victim's best interest.
if i was bitcoins CEO
I'd sell all of you a "second layer solution"
but the second layer would be centralized.
How about we use a sidechain for daily transactions, with exchanges acting as gateways. We can call the sidechain something like SpendingCoin, or... USD?
February 23, 2016, 07:41:44 PM
I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?
LN will be so confusing its like the mixing service was built in.
I think it's possible we're gonna need something like the lightning network eventually, but instead of a hardfork that would buy them more time to build it, they want small blocks so we have the incentive to build it. This is crazy. This is like robbing someone so they have the incentive to be more careful in the future, and trying to justify it as being in the victim's best interest.
if i was bitcoins CEO
I'd sell all of you a "second layer solution"
but the second layer would be centralized.
February 23, 2016, 07:30:33 PM
it would be gr8 if LN was here already and the tutorial to use it was literally
1)open client
2)send XBTC to [email protected]
3)
1)open client
2)send XBTC to [email protected]
3)
@Billy Joe: Don't worry about mixers. Now we have pathetic parasites laundering pittances -- petty pocket change, because virtually free. Come the huge fee revolution, we'll have respectable drug cartels cuing up to launder gobs of BTC!
Gonna be huge...
February 23, 2016, 07:22:23 PM
it would be gr8 if LN was here already and the tutorial to use it was literally
1)open client
2)send XBTC to [email protected]
but i don't see it ever boiling down to that
payment channels
28 day lock times
broadcast "R" if peter todd is being gay
its never going to work.
1)open client
2)send XBTC to [email protected]
but i don't see it ever boiling down to that
payment channels
28 day lock times
broadcast "R" if peter todd is being gay
its never going to work.
February 23, 2016, 07:22:15 PM
I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?
LN will be so confusing its like the mixing service was built in.
I think it's possible we're gonna need something like the lightning network eventually, but instead of a hardfork that would buy them more time to build it, they want small blocks so we have the incentive to build it. This is crazy. This is like robbing someone so they have the incentive to be more careful in the future, and trying to justify it as being in the victim's best interest.
February 23, 2016, 07:16:05 PM
I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?
LN will be so confusing its like the mixing service was built in.
February 23, 2016, 07:09:50 PM
I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?
You think smallblockers spend their high powered central bank settlement monies?
Bitcoin is to have, to HODL.
February 23, 2016, 07:00:49 PM
February 23, 2016, 06:57:09 PM
I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?
February 23, 2016, 06:49:25 PM
you think they will let me come to this thing
i am after all the CEO of bitcoin's cheerleading department, am i not?
I think that your recent cheerleading record (probably the past few months) has devolved into a bit of mixed outcomes....and accordingly even cheerleading that is a bit less than inspiring...
On the other hand, you happen to be CEO and inspiration of one the longest and most active threads in the whole fucking world... so that must be worth something... , no?
Jump to: