Topic: Wallet Compile Service (Read 664 times)

*bump*

dont worry, notice the smiley at the bottom of my post, it was meant lightheartedly, because you asked the impossible question :-)

but on the more serious side, of couse no one should pay for non working compiles, i only charge for working compiles, and if i need to fiddle with the compile process to get a working copy out, then its included in the price..

it took me a couple of weeks, on and off to get the compile process fully working.. (with my job interferring lol) so i know how hard it is to set it up for a fully working compile, and not everyone has had the luck on
getting it to work.

payment is of course via escrow (ÓgNasty is quite trustworthy, used him several times)

Woah woah woah hold it there, I mean no animosity towards your business. Just that many others who offer compile services tend to be much cheaper although most of them tend to require external dependencies when transferred to a totally clean machine. I presume yours will work fine since your fees ain't exactly on the low end. Any guarantee that you will compile any source until it works or just a one time, not working, you want another copy pay again? I'm sure we both know how difficult it is to compile a wallet from source (or even to make it an installer) haha. Just wanna clarify myself in case I come across as someone who wants to sabotage you, I'm not. Although you might want to include more details. In case your compile works while the requestor refuses to pay

sure, it will only cost you 110% of your ICO income :-p

Can I start an ICO with your wallet service? 

there will always be that question, even though you do what you can to try and proof that no tampering has been done...

i can only point to my long time ingagement with different altcoins here, and that i have always been ethical, about what i do, my
trust level, can be an inndicator of how i am as a person, even though there are people here that misuse the trust system.

i could turn the question around, and ask, since your questioning my morality, is it because im threatening your business?

Not that im pointing a finger, i am trying to show you, that you can always point a finger at someone for some reason.

but feel free to look through my posts, and see for yourself what i do.

the compile process does automatically grab the repo from github, import it into gitian, compile it, and out comes finished wallets..

but back to your question, it is actually unproveable that i do not ad anything to the source, since no matter what proof i provide,
someone will always say .. "You could have faked it."

so basically, your question is irrelevant...

the only proofable method would be for someone who needs a wallet compiled and thinks someone might do something to the code,
to get wallet compiled by 2 different people, using the same version of all libraries and compilers.



:-)

I will be building a website for this service... and it will be automated when done.

How different are your compiles? How do you prove that you will not/never modify the source code to add your own personal codes?

I will compile your wallets for:

* Windows (BTC 0.05) - which gets you *coind, *coin-qt (dependant on what the coin is based on also *coin-cli *coin-tx) zipped in 32 and 64 bit packages, as well as 32 and 64 bit windows install files

* MacOSX (BTC 0.05) which gets you a DMG image with *coind *coin-qt (dependant on what the coin is based on also *coin-cli *coin-tx)

both for BTC 0.09

send me a PM include github link

Payment via OgNasty Escrow. And and prices are for fully compiled sources. no working executable means no payment.