Domain name value is subjective.
Very much so. When using them as collateral you must use the lowest value of that subjective range of values.
Here's the kicker, subjective means dependent on the subject, someone totally uninterested in domain names would see any domain name as worthless, so by your logic all domain names as collateral are worthless? Of course not, the truth is some people will value domain names as collateral more than others. I'm not looking for an insignificant loan, I know realistically someone wouldn't loan me several BTC for my domains, but I believe there are some who would value my domains more or less like I do, obviously you don't, but then again I would be ashamed to value gram.claims at anything above $0 so we're definitely not on the same page.
I would definitely not value the list I gave you as less than $600 collateral, $1,400 at the very least.
I disagree. But even at $1,400 you were asking a $6.6k loan and now $3.3k. Asking for a loan with insufficient collateral is untrustworthy.
I value them as more than $1,400 as collateral, $1,400 is the lowest value I would consider, below that is not being honest in my opinion, my names objectively aren't shit, I'm not gonna go through the trouble of transferring them for an insignificant loan.
And again it was a partial list, read my pm again, "here are
some of the names I can offer as collateral".
Because domain name value is subjective I was looking for a back and forth discussion where the lender would tell me how he values the domains so we would be both comfortable.
It seems you are trying to sell your domains. Do not try to fake a sale as a loan
False accusation. I value my domain names, I'm not gonna transfer them away to a stranger after one pm, I want to feel comfortable, and because domain name value is subjective I was expecting the lender to tell me how he values the domains as collateral. If a lender uninterested in domain names sees them as worthless and another more educated lender sees the value in them I'm not gonna get a worthless loan from the first one, can you understand that? That doesn't make it "trying to fake a sale as a loan", because the value is subjective different lenders would offer different loans and I'm not gonna go for the lowest loan, can you understand that? I'm tired of defending myself against false accusations, that's all you people have been doing, not respecting me, treating me as a scammer and shitting on my thread ever since the beginning and I have better things to do than dealing with that shit, you disgust me.
I'm willing to lower my loan request to 0.5 BTC for the full list of collateral I can offer, this is open to discussion for interested parties in pm.
I am reluctant to list the domains in public for privacy reasons, and I am reluctant to give the full list right away to someone I don't know, if I see the lender and I are on the same page then I will.
However you didn't send the list via PM. You are either lying or are terrible making deals.
I explained why but you don't seem to comprehend, let's say I'm emotionally invested in my domains and want to feel comfortable before transferring them away, I want a discussion where both the lender and I feel comfortable, that's my way of doing things, that's not how you do things fine, but remember you don't see me shitting all over your threads.
from the way you react it is obvious you never planned to consider giving me a loan in the first place
That's a lie.
In the past 3 years you have had 4 feedbacks
That's another lie. Stop lying. The fact you blatantly lie on this unimportant matter is another red flag.
My bad, that wasn't a lie, I was looking at the "trusted feedback" list, the "untrusted feedback" list wasn't showing, still even in that list in the past few years I find no feedback for a loan.
none of them related to a loan, that alone would deserve negative trust but I'm not trigger happy like you are.
So you think not having feedback related to loans in the last 3 years deserves negative trust but asking for a loan with insufficient collateral doesn't?
I think pretending to consider offering me a loan with no intention of doing so would deserve negative trust, you abused my trust, I did not, my collateral is sufficient for a lender who would take the time to discuss with me to find a common ground, maybe we would settle at 0.5 BTC for many of my domains, maybe a little less, maybe he would want to charge high interests since domain names aren't as liquid as altcoins, I'm open to discussion, I want discussion so both the lender and I are comfortable, yet all I've been getting from the likes of you is false accusations without knowing me.