Topic: WAP BOUNTY MANAGER (Read 182 times)
Bounty managers are managing a bunch members, it's reasonable if they can't replied all peoples messages. As you're participating signature campaign, the quality of your post is the main reason why you got removed. Judging from your post which only shitposting and doesn't add any value, that's fair if they removed you. Why should they pay shitposter/spammer isn't?
Just move on and try other bounty, don't be too sad, it's enough to be a lesson for you to be more selective in choosing each bounty that will be followed, you are lucky enough to know this situation at the beginning imagine if you've been doing work long enough but it turns out you're banned which means you won't get rewards.
Such newbie campaign managers are irresponsible in most cases. It is better not to participate signature campaign in such projects. There are many well reputed managers in the forum. You can participate in the signature campaign managed by them. I see you have already participated in a signature campaign.
~
I'm not an expert on scam busting, but actually the Whitepaper is quite similar. Maybe it's not plagiarism, but people offer Whitepepers writing services for projects and maybe in this case it was the same person, hence the similarities ..Sometimes what I find with the whitepaper services are all plagiarized from other projects.
I fully agree with you. If in this case the whole project (including the Whitepaper itself) is prepared very unprofessionally, we cannot expect that the bounty manager will behave professionally. This is probably someone who run campaign for the first time and wants to use his power. After all it costs him nothing to write a few words about why the user was banned.
this is also the reason why try to prevent from joining in a campaign/bounties that runs by Newbie account because mostly these accounts are run by the Developers team and will surely rely in what the motive of the team , if to Scam then all participants will be victims.
Well, in most of the bounty campaigns, it is clearly stated that the bounty manager have the right to approve or disqualify any participant. As a bounty hunter I totally understand how it feels not to be accepted to do a particular project. But then it is deemed necessary that we read carefully through the rules and regulations of any project before undertaking any task.
I know sometimes, we may be tempted to just go ahead and participate in a bounty without following up all the rules probably because we feel we have been in the crypto-currency space for quite a while and all the rules seem to be the Same.
While that is true, let us not also forget that one bounty rule may differ from another.
Since the bounty manager didn't respond to you, I guess it is necessary that you go back to the rules once more and check whether there's anything you ommitted that could have led to you immediate disqualification. Just a suggestion though.
I know sometimes, we may be tempted to just go ahead and participate in a bounty without following up all the rules probably because we feel we have been in the crypto-currency space for quite a while and all the rules seem to be the Same.
While that is true, let us not also forget that one bounty rule may differ from another.
Since the bounty manager didn't respond to you, I guess it is necessary that you go back to the rules once more and check whether there's anything you ommitted that could have led to you immediate disqualification. Just a suggestion though.
~
I'm not an expert on scam busting, but actually the Whitepaper is quite similar. Maybe it's not plagiarism, but people offer Whitepepers writing services for projects and maybe in this case it was the same person, hence the similarities ..Sometimes what I find with the whitepaper services are all plagiarized from other projects.
I fully agree with you. If in this case the whole project (including the Whitepaper itself) is prepared very unprofessionally, we cannot expect that the bounty manager will behave professionally. This is probably someone who run campaign for the first time and wants to use his power. After all it costs him nothing to write a few words about why the user was banned.
~
I'm not an expert on scam busting, but actually the Whitepaper is quite similar. Maybe it's not plagiarism, but people offer Whitepepers writing services for projects and maybe in this case it was the same person, hence the similarities ..Sometimes what I find with the whitepaper services are all plagiarized from other projects.
I fully agree with you. If in this case the whole project (including the Whitepaper itself) is prepared very unprofessionally, we cannot expect that the bounty manager will behave professionally. This is probably someone who run campaign for the first time and wants to use his power. After all it costs him nothing to write a few words about why the user was banned.
I will proceed to remove my signature from the campaign, even if he decided to lift the ban, am no more interested in the project anymore.
Since you have said this, then Just move on and forget about your claim since The manager seems to be irresponsive and not a Good in behaving, or maybe you asked too much
that made Him ignore your messages?
Quote
I feel bounty managers are more civic and responsible than this mode of operation.
Yes they Must , but manager like This is a Newbie and looks like a Part of the team that cares nothing about His management career because he
will only manage campaigns that requires by their team and nothing more so expect this Attitude and be a mature account to move on .
Bounty or campaign manager may remove anyone from their campaign at anytime but if they are doing it for without any reason then his reputation may be ruined. If you are sure about you didn't broke any rules of their bounty then you can create a thread in the reputation so the manager may say his opinion in the thread if he is not willing to discuss in the private handle.
You should move this into the service discussion. You must not judge him for that. It seems like wap bounty manager has a reason for that and that's why he can't tell you about that. Im feeling doubt if he has no reason by banning you. I have checked the spreadsheet and there are two people got banned by the campaign while there are another participants that gor approved and almost all of participants got approved by the bounty manager. You can talk with yourself whether you have done something wrong with. The manager can't be blamed as he has the right to accept or remove participants from the campaign. Just move to the another campaign if you're feeling good with it. This may make you a bit better rather than stay in such campaign.
I can't believe you actually posted this! Lol, the manager can't be blamed, what are you talking about! If he can ban a participant from his/her campaign then he can state the reason why, either way, that does not mean he is obligated to keep the participant, but the explanation is necessary,
Assuming you got banned from your current campaign without any reason why am sure you will be pleased with the bm action and proceed to the next campaign, a participant has the right to know why they got banned from a campaign without any valid reason.
~
I'm not an expert on scam busting, but actually the Whitepaper is quite similar. Maybe it's not plagiarism, but people offer Whitepepers writing services for projects and maybe in this case it was the same person, hence the similarities ..Sometimes what I find with the whitepaper services are all plagiarized from other projects.
As far as i know wapswap already listed on CMC while udego was a new project that is not yet listed anywhere. It's not even on CMC. I guess that if there was a possibility for udego to plagiarize the whitepaper that used by wapswap. Udego was a new project unlike wapswap. Im only talking about the possibility.
What I found in other domain info is that Udego is first compared to WapSwap, you try to see the difference in terms of the age of the domain.
Quote from: https://whois.domaintools.com/udego.finance
141 days old
Created on 2021-07-26
Expires on 2022-07-26
Updated on 2021-08-11
Created on 2021-07-26
Expires on 2022-07-26
Updated on 2021-08-11
Quote from: https://whois.domaintools.com/wapswap.finance
112 days old
Created on 2021-08-24
Expires on 2022-08-24
Updated on 2021-10-01
Created on 2021-08-24
Expires on 2022-08-24
Updated on 2021-10-01
I see the second whitepaper is almost the same, so can it be called plagiarism or the two projects are the same?
As far as i know wapswap already listed on CMC while udego was a new project that is not yet listed anywhere. It's not even on CMC. I guess that if there was a possibility for udego to plagiarize the whitepaper that used by wapswap. Udego was a new project unlike wapswap. Im only talking about the possibility. I'm not an expert on scam busting, but actually the Whitepaper is quite similar. Maybe it's not plagiarism, but people offer Whitepepers writing services for projects and maybe in this case it was the same person, hence the similarities ..
This may possible of both of projects used the same service but that needs more investigation. I'm a little confused between WapSwap Finance and Udego Finance, are they almost the same, are these two projects the same or different?
In terms of bounty threads are almost the same - Bounty WapSwap /// Bounty Udego
From the ANN thread it's the same too - ANN WapSwap /// ANN UDEGO
Whitepaper Wapswap: https://wapswapfinance.gitbook.io/wapswap/
Whitepaper Udego: https://udegofinance.gitbook.io/udego-finance/
I see the second whitepaper is almost the same, so can it be called plagiarism or the two projects are the same?
In terms of bounty threads are almost the same - Bounty WapSwap /// Bounty Udego
From the ANN thread it's the same too - ANN WapSwap /// ANN UDEGO
Whitepaper Wapswap: https://wapswapfinance.gitbook.io/wapswap/
Whitepaper Udego: https://udegofinance.gitbook.io/udego-finance/
I see the second whitepaper is almost the same, so can it be called plagiarism or the two projects are the same?
I'm not an expert on scam busting, but actually the Whitepaper is quite similar. Maybe it's not plagiarism, but people offer Whitepepers writing services for projects and maybe in this case it was the same person, hence the similarities ..
I'm a little confused between WapSwap Finance and Udego Finance, are they almost the same, are these two projects the same or different?
In terms of bounty threads are almost the same - Bounty WapSwap /// Bounty Udego
From the ANN thread it's the same too - ANN WapSwap /// ANN UDEGO
Whitepaper Wapswap: https://wapswapfinance.gitbook.io/wapswap/
Whitepaper Udego: https://udegofinance.gitbook.io/udego-finance/
I see the second whitepaper is almost the same, so can it be called plagiarism or the two projects are the same?
In terms of bounty threads are almost the same - Bounty WapSwap /// Bounty Udego
From the ANN thread it's the same too - ANN WapSwap /// ANN UDEGO
Whitepaper Wapswap: https://wapswapfinance.gitbook.io/wapswap/
Whitepaper Udego: https://udegofinance.gitbook.io/udego-finance/
I see the second whitepaper is almost the same, so can it be called plagiarism or the two projects are the same?
I joined WAP signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-wapswap-finance-worlds-first-chain-balancing-token-cbt-5372300 , when I check my first week for a possible stake count, I discovered the BM has ban me without any reason. I wrote to him on telegram on the bounty group to ask why I was ban, he said he will check, after 12hrs, I did a remainder to him again, he never replied, after 24hrs I did another remainder, he read the chat and never respond. It's been more than 48hrs now he still didn't give reason for banning me. I am number 22 on the signature list. I will proceed to remove my signature from the campaign, even if he decided to lift the ban, am no more interested in the project anymore.
I feel bounty managers are more civic and responsible than this mode of operation.
I feel bounty managers are more civic and responsible than this mode of operation.
I'm sorry that you have been banned, but unfortunately any bounty manager has the right to remove any campaign participant even without giving any reason. It happens very rarely and usually the reason is given, but it depends only on the manager's will.
He should have a section in the spreadsheet clearing the reason to ban you. Unlikely, he doesn't, but it's always up to him to do this or not.
In the rules for almost all campaign managers, there is a warning that BM has the right to remove anybody from the campaign without giving the reason based on his own discretion. You must have been see it before joining the campaign.
Usually, bounty managers have a lot of tasks to do and i find it normal that he couldn't find time to answer all the queries. Imagine how many messages can receive someone managing campaigns with thousands of subscribers.
In the rules for almost all campaign managers, there is a warning that BM has the right to remove anybody from the campaign without giving the reason based on his own discretion. You must have been see it before joining the campaign.
Usually, bounty managers have a lot of tasks to do and i find it normal that he couldn't find time to answer all the queries. Imagine how many messages can receive someone managing campaigns with thousands of subscribers.
It seems like wap bounty manager has a reason for that and that's why he can't tell you about that. Im feeling doubt if he has no reason by banning you.
While we agree that it's a manager's prerogative to choose and recruit whoever they find fit to be in their bounties, it's also necessary for them to offer explanations where necessary when a participant is banned. According to OP, they've made such enquiry to find out why they were banned to no avail even when it seemed the BM got and read the offline messages from OP. This is bad publicity for the cooperate image of OP and the managerial business they run. I ain't sure it costs much to respond to questions if one wants to stay long in business. 
You should move this into the service discussion. You must not judge him for that. It seems like wap bounty manager has a reason for that and that's why he can't tell you about that. Im feeling doubt if he has no reason by banning you. I have checked the spreadsheet and there are two people got banned by the campaign while there are another participants that gor approved and almost all of participants got approved by the bounty manager. You can talk with yourself whether you have done something wrong with. The manager can't be blamed as he has the right to accept or remove participants from the campaign. Just move to the another campaign if you're feeling good with it. This may make you a bit better rather than stay in such campaign.
I joined WAP signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-wapswap-finance-worlds-first-chain-balancing-token-cbt-5372300 , when I check my first week for a possible stake count, I discovered the BM has ban me without any reason. I wrote to him on telegram on the bounty group to ask why I was ban, he said he will check, after 12hrs, I did a remainder to him again, he never replied, after 24hrs I did another remainder, he read the chat and never respond. It's been more than 48hrs now he still didn't give reason for banning me. I am number 22 on the signature list. I will proceed to remove my signature from the campaign, even if he decided to lift the ban, am no more interested in the project anymore.
I feel bounty managers are more civic and responsible than this mode of operation.
I feel bounty managers are more civic and responsible than this mode of operation.
Jump to: