Topic: War instead of elections (Read 493 times)

You don't have to worry about how I can see better, I'll decide without you.

Take your blinders off, so that you can see that your Russian concerns amount to nothing, without the rest of the world being included.

As usual, you forget to read... like about the Russian elections I mentioned.

  Dear, I am concerned about the elections not in Africa and not in America, but primarily in Russia, and this topic is about that. If you are concerned about the elections in America, then open the topic and fill it with your thoughts.

You should be concerned about the elections in America. If Trump wins, support for Zelensky will be gone. When it is gone, it won't matter how much you hate Putin and Russia. Russia will win the war hands down, then, no matter who the Oligarchs elect to take Putin's place.

 I am concerned about the elections in Russia, not in Africa.

Politicians are not interested the welfare of their citizens but their personal interest. If really politicians are really standing for the welfare of the citizens war would been a secondary issue in any political scene. Look at what is happening even in the advance countries in the war. As for me Democracy is nothing but a camouflage the people. Even in America and Russia war is used in election then in Africa there will no election it will be only war to win election territories.

Yes, but there are countries like Russia that want war.

War is never a suitable life pattern for humans to live their life. The best way to live is humans to always embrace peace, the society we are was not created to make wars, humans were not created to make war and lose their life. The purpose of humans  is to live and to enjoy the beautiful things life has.

Election is what is being conducted to ensure that there will be no a gravitation of wall into the country or into the state because they knew that with an election been properly conducted that will be no one because the person being selected into power is the People's mandate and people's choice so with that, the person they defeated will you not call for wall because it is people's selection from different area that's why people prefer conducting election now I'm creating a wall in a political system in order to acquire power

   History shows that the occupier always loses.

The Ukraine war will end with Ukraine the winner, and Zelensky the loser.

  Wars end with the winner and the loser.

One day this war will be over because they will gonna realize how evil the outcome is, right now they won't really ponder on what would be the ending will be because their families are safe and secure hidden in some part of the world. I'm talking about the mastermind of the ongoing war. As soon as the war will get out of hand and their families got severely affected, that's when they realized there was no good result in this and probably end it even though the damage itself is also severe. They will gonna agreed on talks and some peaceful way to resolve it.

  Alas, it happened.
 

From your topic, most country prayers is to live in peace without war within their nearest countries unlike Russia and Ukraine war. Well they both knows what their problems may be but I believe the war will for sure end one day. All we need is to keep supporting both countries in prayers in a regular basis.

I don't believe anyone will be able to choose war instead of election because war does not bring anything good,and only when one is tired of the life the he or she is living,that he will pray for war.It is percieved that this coming election win be more of war than peace,this sounds bad and this will never favour anyone.At the end of the day,it's the masses that will suffer,the poor ones and the ones who don't have anywhere to go to that will suffer The politicians that will cause the war already have where they will run to,and won't be in the war,but those that are not rich won't be able to go to anywhere,and they are the ones who will suffer the issues and the problems that they have caused.We pray nothing like that happens.

War is not the solution to the problems,  war will take take away innocent peoples life that their blood is more precious than whatever may be the cause of the war. Instead of war it is better election is conducted to choose that leader who can lead and serve the citizens better.

I apologize regarding your question in your first sentence there***. I didn't realize you were color blind. Color blind people might miss something like light pink highlighting. If they saw it at all, it would only appear as very light grey. Get a friend who isn't color blind to check out the pink highlighted place that is the answer to your question, so that you can read what is there.

Of course, if you are totally blind, I really apologize. And I admire you for the work you are trying to do. I understand why you wouldn't want to advertise your blindness. In that case, your friend who is reading this forum for you, and maybe typing your responses for you, really needs to get into it a little deeper, so that he/she can make the whole thing totally clear to you.

Of course, if your blindness goes deeper than the eyes... I'll try to be a little more sympathetic with your condition in the future. But do check out the pink highlighting, above.

   This is not an answer to the question, when did Ukraine attack Russia? And if it didn’t attack, then Russia had no right to invade Ukraine and kill Ukrainians. Or justify the invasion by the fact that there was a coup in Ukraine, as a result of which the corrupt president fled to Russia, leaving the golden toilets. What business is it of Russia what happens in a foreign country, and to annex the territory of a foreign country for this is real impudence. Even greater impudence to start a war on the grounds that in a foreign country the Russian language was deprived of the status of the state language. In Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Azerbaijan, and others, Russian has been deprived of the status of a state, which means that Russia should be expected to invade and kill these countries as well. The Empire of Lies will be defeated, and the fate of Hitler awaits the fascist Putin.

Slow down a little, and learn to read.

  So, when did Ukraine attack Russia?

Do you really think that when the Ukrainian government/military moved against Russians and Russian friendly Ukrainians in Donbas for the last 14 years... do you really believe that this was not an attack on Russia? Russia and the Ukraine have been sister nations for decades and decades. Pushing Russia into a civil war isn't the way you treat family.

Of course, it was the US leaders and others like them that were behind it all. The CIA was behind the counting of the votes, and the 3 (more?) coups that made it look like the Ukrainian people were dead set against Russia. And it was done for money.

Search on the three big US corporations that have bought up 60% of Ukrainian farmland since 2014. The US is simply protecting their interests, and conquering Ukraine, and making it look like sister Russia is the demon.

  There is definitely a logic of Lies here. Not one word is true. This lie about Ukraine planning to attack Russia is a perfect example of classic Absurdity.

Here, do pardon my use of Putin in place of dictatorship and Ukraine instead of commoners. As my fellow forum member, Xinarae, has rightly put it in reply to this post, '
war should not be desired over election.' But where Putin is involved, sorry, war would definitely claim the answer over Ukraine. Election actually was supposed to be a platform whereby credible leadership were to be put in place but the opposite is the case today in so many countries of the world. Take Africa as a victim of electoral malpractice and United States as a victor. Nigerians will tell you to your face, rigging is part of the process. And Putin will continue to rule supreme in Africa.

As Stalin said long ago, "It's not he who votes that counts, but he that counts the votes."

If Ukraine ever had elections that weren't manipulated by the vote counters, the people and government would have become friends with Russia long ago, and the war would have not been needed to protect Russia from Stalin-like Ukrainian government usurpers moving against Russia.

  And who said that long-term projects are good? All dictators, as history shows, had a sad end.

War is not the solution to any problem. But it creates many problems like poverty, disability, hunger, etc. World war-1 & world war -2 shows that how it brought havoc and destruction to the world. loss of millions of people's life uncountable loss of money and property pushed humanity to a low standard of life and all nations of the world were come to think of some solution through table talk.but.........Election and democracy is a good trend and tradition to give respect to the opinion of the people regarding their rights.

There is no dictator that would be willing to submit or loose power willing, not of this world, not by a chance. Looking at the life they enjoy at being the past of all things and making decisions with biased mindsets without being questioned or answerable to anyone, it makes the possibility of loosing power to be accompanied by crazy moves to keep it. War isn't a limitation to that as, elections through democracy is far from the dictatorship form of governance. What a use of the army he has got there, properly stationed to not just instill fear in the minds of voters but might even handle and alter electoral materials and result in his favour should it come to that.

Politicians do not like losing power or territory and will drag the entire country to war because of their ambitions. If they can go to war on their own with their family members alone I do not think anyone will care. It is the way we find it in Africa also with politicians not conceding defeat in elections. Highly selfish individuals who will go to sleep while the entire country burns provided it does not affect them.

You are right because war is like a destructive elements between two counterparts, and immediately they introduce war for something that will be resolve with initiative, in the best way to settle a dispute agreement and understanding, from things i notice when a band of war is drawn everything will be scattered i think what you said is best option.

But it seems like violence is the best way to achieve what one desires recently.
The politics of government and countries aren't favourable to the masses.
Democracy lately is not even respected.

In my opinion, war is (and not going to be) a solution to settle disputes or achieve any goals.
Here is this case war will not going to solve this issue. Yes indeed following the democratic procedures can give you the results to return Ukraine to the bosom of the Russian Empire. Democracy is the only solution, not the war.

You do have a good point, but POWER is very drowning, and the more a person bath in power, the more he seeks it and want to have it for himself. Which leads to the current corruption in Russia that was seen right now.

It also happens in the Philippines in the regime of Marcoses, It was a democratic country yet he holds presidency for 21 years which leads to finished infrastracture projects. But the other side of the coin is pure madness; murders for anyone who seeks justice, media was robbed from their right to broadcast, Large scale corruption, and many more. All of this is just for the sake of holding the power of presidency.

It is indeed true that some projects are being discontinued but the reason is logical and rational. Those are only for some, but most projects are being continued, its just that the current administration who finished it takes the credit.

.our politicians should take away selfish interest away and consider the common citizens. If war should happen they will run away to hide. War affects children and women mostly . I think war is not the best because of a political position.

Well, it happens all over the world. Countries doing elections every 4-6 years are fucked. One big example is the US, that's why politics in the country is bad and the system changes all the time. If they had just stick to Bush all the way until now, they could've built the greatest warlord empire.

Once China or Russia adopts this kind of system, they will eventually fail because they couldn't finish long-term projects when the next president will be trying to destroy the legacy and reputation of the opposition by discontinuing their projects.

You said "if" well.

Russia is a stable country,  things will change if a new president comes.

Now consider China which doesnt go election, their development continues unlike the country that will change administration every 4-6years. They may say its democratic but chaotic since there will be new stance on what matters. What matters for demo may not matter for the reps.

I have questions with regards to this situation,

If they start a war, will Putin be still the president of Russia, for another term, or just time being after the war?

Cause I'm very curious on what will be the pros and cons of having the war in regards to Putins presidency.

War should not be desired instead of elections may every world be beautiful and may all people wish peace. Elections are an important issue in politics especially in the politics of power even a dictator wants to consolidate his power and the politics he pursues through elections once a time has passed many times when the election verdict goes against the ruling party trouble is created. The power and institutions that they had to deal with in the election have never happened in the past in the politics of voting in this country.

Politicians, aggression, endless wars, the passing of lives, refugees. We all yearn for world peace, and everyone lives a happy life. But this is impossible. At least we see no hope for now .

Alik Bakhshi

War instead of elections


    On the eve of the upcoming elections, Putin organized a grandiose military exercise along the entire perimeter of the Ukrainian border, including the Belarusian-Ukrainian one. Understanding perfectly well the possible defeat of his party in the elections and taking into account his declining popularity among the people, the Chekist can easily interrupt the elections by starting a war with Ukraine. It seems that the two dictators have decided that war is the surest way to maintain their power. Of course, Putin does not want a repetition of the Belarusian scenario of unsuccessful elections in Russia, and in this case there is nothing better than a war.
   Moreover, the war will finally end the plan, which began in 2014, to return Ukraine to the bosom of the Russian Empire, and also solve the problem of Transnistria. Even if he fails to capture the entire territory of Ukraine, Putin will try to break through the capture of Odessa a corridor to Moldova, completely cutting off Ukraine from the Black Sea.

   The West, due to legislative democratic procedures, will not be able to instantly agree on a joint rebuff to the impudent invasion. The advantage of totalitarian power over democracy will be evident. However, in the long term, the defeat of Russia is inevitable, it is only a pity that many people will be victims of Putin's adventure.

  09/15/2021