We have rectified the opinion of a forum user the whitepaper, partly understanding it but not sharing the form or the modes. We inform the entire community and other users that our official and rectified whitepaper (version in English and Spanish) are version 1.0 of March 28 of the current year. We consider the matter settled.
We request that all the contents inside and outside the forum about this accusation be removed, which with the opinion and understanding we have rectified and you can review.
We request that all the contents inside and outside the forum about this accusation be removed, which with the opinion and understanding we have rectified and you can review.
When I confronted you about your plagiarized whitepaper, you mentioned about changing it into your own versions. Unfortunately, you cannot remedy anymore your situation by providing another whitepaper. The fact that you have initially plagiarized your first whitepaper does not delete the fact that you had the intention of fooling everyone.
I will not delete my negative trust due to the anomalies in your whitepaper and the messages posted by the fellow members here.
Whitepapers are an important part of a project so if a project is plagiarized it is clear that it will fool the community regardless of what in the future it will be nonsense what they talk about as a project goal in the future.
Problem will be fatal where the community will know how important the whitepaper is so it is clear that whatever the WP has been revised with your word I am sure they only replace the word and concept with the plagiarism they had at the beginning.
