Was it Zynga? January In Depth. | Bitcointalksearch.org

skivrmt

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 501

Quote from: alpha492 on January 12, 2014, 07:05:04 AM

Planning on posting mid-month analysis within the next few days, keep on eye on wallstreetcrypto if your interested.

I'll pre-help. Wink

If we don't hold these levels in the mid 800's by the end of the weekend I think we'll slowly slide to the mid to low 700's. Volume really decreased and not enough to sustain little run.

alpha492

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 100

Planning on posting mid-month analysis within the next few days, keep on eye on wallstreetcrypto if your interested.

alpha492

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 100

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 09, 2014, 09:38:10 AM

Quote from: alpha492 on January 08, 2014, 08:43:35 PM

Anyone else getting sick of the clowns at Bloomberg, Business Insider, and Forbes attributing very natural market activity to imaginary catalysts?

http://www.wallstreetcrypto.com/2014/01/was-it-zynga-january-in-depth.html

Stop over at wallstreetcrypto for real analysis from contributors with a real history of involvement in cryptocurrency not jackasses trying to Monday morning quarterback Bitcoin.

Read the blog post before I seen this forum post and it echoed my sentiments exactly.

But this is typical of basically all financial media reporting. The price moves in a direction first, the news to 'explain' that move comes second and a laughable second at that, with the odd notable exceptions of course (China ban).

In my opinion, if its not predictive its not worth saying. Hindsight requires a particularly irritating kind of arrogance. Thanks for stopping by the site and sharing your thoughts!

arepo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

this statement is false

Quote from: skivrmt on January 09, 2014, 10:03:05 AM

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 09, 2014, 09:38:10 AM

Quote from: alpha492 on January 08, 2014, 08:43:35 PM

Anyone else getting sick of the clowns at Bloomberg, Business Insider, and Forbes attributing very natural market activity to imaginary catalysts?

http://www.wallstreetcrypto.com/2014/01/was-it-zynga-january-in-depth.html

Stop over at wallstreetcrypto for real analysis from contributors with a real history of involvement in cryptocurrency not jackasses trying to Monday morning quarterback Bitcoin.

Read the blog post before I seen this forum post and it echoed my sentiments exactly.

But this is typical of basically all financial media reporting. The price moves in a direction first, the news to 'explain' that move comes second and a laughable second at that, with the odd notable exceptions of course (China ban).

This is typical though of not just Bitcoin but even the general markets. Very few people realize most news outlets have pre-prepared news story of why the DOW went down today and why the DOW went up today. They basically make some minor changes to either story, and boom, here's the "why" the market went up, good earnings, good reporting numbers, etc.

haha the funny thing is, threads like wallwatcher are infected with the same kind of superficial "explain away" attitude which is actually pretty dangerous in its self-assuredness with regards to things like markets...

skivrmt

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 501

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 09, 2014, 09:38:10 AM

Quote from: alpha492 on January 08, 2014, 08:43:35 PM

Anyone else getting sick of the clowns at Bloomberg, Business Insider, and Forbes attributing very natural market activity to imaginary catalysts?

http://www.wallstreetcrypto.com/2014/01/was-it-zynga-january-in-depth.html

Stop over at wallstreetcrypto for real analysis from contributors with a real history of involvement in cryptocurrency not jackasses trying to Monday morning quarterback Bitcoin.

Read the blog post before I seen this forum post and it echoed my sentiments exactly.

But this is typical of basically all financial media reporting. The price moves in a direction first, the news to 'explain' that move comes second and a laughable second at that, with the odd notable exceptions of course (China ban).

This is typical though of not just Bitcoin but even the general markets. Very few people realize most news outlets have pre-prepared news story of why the DOW went down today and why the DOW went up today. They basically make some minor changes to either story, and boom, here's the "why" the market went up, good earnings, good reporting numbers, etc.

MatTheCat

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: alpha492 on January 08, 2014, 08:43:35 PM

Anyone else getting sick of the clowns at Bloomberg, Business Insider, and Forbes attributing very natural market activity to imaginary catalysts?

http://www.wallstreetcrypto.com/2014/01/was-it-zynga-january-in-depth.html

Stop over at wallstreetcrypto for real analysis from contributors with a real history of involvement in cryptocurrency not jackasses trying to Monday morning quarterback Bitcoin.

Read the blog post before I seen this forum post and it echoed my sentiments exactly.

But this is typical of basically all financial media reporting. The price moves in a direction first, the news to 'explain' that move comes second and a laughable second at that, with the odd notable exceptions of course (China ban).

alpha492

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 100

Also, feel free to join #cryptoforex on freenode for live lessons and Q&A

alpha492

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 100

Anyone else getting sick of the clowns at Bloomberg, Business Insider, and Forbes attributing very natural market activity to imaginary catalysts?

http://www.wallstreetcrypto.net/2014/01/was-it-zynga-january-in-depth_22.html

Stop over at wallstreetcrypto for real analysis from contributors with a real history of involvement in cryptocurrency not jackasses trying to Monday morning quarterback Bitcoin.

Topic: Was it Zynga? January In Depth. (Read 1369 times)