The answer is: 1. We all witnessed.
Because nobody will now bother to attempt to outdo the ridiculously stupid fake signing proof that we all saw.
Topic: Ways how Satoshi can deliver a WRONG proof that he is himself? (Read 324 times)
Satoshi can definitely return easily and prove that it's him but I highly doubt that he'll do that. He left Bitcoin for a reason.
What a coincidence with your username!
Why should Satoshi come back and prove something to community? There are so many bla-bla talkings about him.
Satoshi can definitely return easily and prove that it's him but I highly doubt that he'll do that. He left Bitcoin for a reason.
All he needs to do is sign with the address which received funds from the Genesis block, or with another address known to be owned by satoshi. The address is here.
It should be an extremely simple task, and if satoshi ever wanted to return they could do that in just a few minutes, provided that they still have access to that address (which they most likely do).
You know that Craig Wright was a bastard, for example, because he made providing that he was satoshi look like some kind of arduous task. Here's what he said:
It should be an extremely simple task, and if satoshi ever wanted to return they could do that in just a few minutes, provided that they still have access to that address (which they most likely do).
You know that Craig Wright was a bastard, for example, because he made providing that he was satoshi look like some kind of arduous task. Here's what he said:
Quote from: Craig Wright
For some there is no burden of proof high enough, no evidence that cannot be dismissed as fabrication or manipulation. This is the nature of belief and swimming against this current would be futile.
I will present what I believe to be 'extraordinary proof' and ask only that it be independently validated. Ultimately, I can do no more than that.
If you mined the genesis block, you are satoshi (unless their computers were stolen/hacked, which is unlikely considering that all the funds are still in their addresses). I will present what I believe to be 'extraordinary proof' and ask only that it be independently validated. Ultimately, I can do no more than that.
Satoshi Nakomoto is a dude from Greece who foresaw what was happening to his country and decided to take matters into his own hands. He saved himself from a life of poverty like the rest of the Greeks, and is now chilling anonymously on a private island having slowly cashed out his Bitcoins and ran with his billions. That is what I heard, anyways... 
You shouldn't believe every thing that you hear, private island 
he doesn't even have a private di*do you idiot I wonder how would he be cashing out slowly while his coins are untouched for years?I know of one way that he could prove himself to be the real founder, by spending or signing a message with the first bitcoin block mined.
Satoshi Nakomoto is a dude from Greece who foresaw what was happening to his country and decided to take matters into his own hands. He saved himself from a life of poverty like the rest of the Greeks, and is now chilling anonymously on a private island having slowly cashed out his Bitcoins and ran with his billions. That is what I heard, anyways...
Just to get some people on the logic case.
Next poll could be, e.g. WHY there are somtimes such funny failed proofs.
Next poll could be, e.g. WHY there are somtimes such funny failed proofs.
Jump to: