Author

Topic: We are building the Bitcoin's first truly integrated marketplace. (Read 1258 times)

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
nothing wrong with a little internet humor...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=41592.80

Bitmit seems like it has really gained traction in the last couple of months, what has been the response from the trade sections of this forum?

Maybe reach out to tokashi, and ask him what some of the challenges have been.

Ultimately we all want btc to thrive, and better to work together...

Bitmit is great but I see a fundamental problem with many bitcoin services not just bitmit.

Many of them are clearly aimed at Bitcoin users, who are usually techies and early adopters.
Before Square came along, accepting credit cards was very difficult and you had to go the bank..ect. But now anyone can start accepting credit cards without even thinking about it.

This is the kind experience we are creating. We want people to use bitcoins without them even knowing it.


You keep saying "we". Who is "we"?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 512
GLBSE Support [email protected]
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
have you tried using bitmit? its seems like using a sandpaper condom...

I hear Atlas does that. He likes it rough®

We are building the Bitcoin's first truly integrated marketplace

Yay. Another person referring to themselves in the third person and incapable of saying "I am".
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 512
GLBSE Support [email protected]
How is this different to BitMit?
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1000
Sounds good, I'm interested to see how this will develop.
donator
Activity: 266
Merit: 252
I'm actually a pineapple
The plan looks promising! Feel free to ignore them, but I have a couple of nitpicky suggestions about your promotional image:

The typography is kind of wonky, and it's a bit jarring to the eyes:
  • The weights aren't consistent across or even within glyphs: check the right of the lowercase 'a' or of an uppercase 'B', or see how the 'w' appears heavier than characters adjacent to it.
  • The kerning is a little funny: for example, "forum" appears to almost be two words, "for" "um".
  • Ligatures are turned off, so the "ffi" in "sufficient" gets overlappy and look a little messy.
  • You have a slightly different color (dark gray) for most occurrences of the word "Bitcoin" near the beginning, but near the end you stop.

You also have "it's" where "its" belongs, and I'd replace the "Without it" at the end with "Otherwise," or something to that effect (what's the "it"?).
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
We are building the Bitcoin's first truly integrated marketplace, while tackling some of the biggest issues and concerns regarding Bitcoins.
Please read and tell us what you think.

Long Form: http://goo.gl/E4Ci7
Less detailed, imageform: http://imgur.com/UuTqI

Signup: http://classfy.com
Jump to: