The UK needs to keep its nuclear deterrent.
The world is becoming a more dangerous place and not more peaceful.
Scrap our EU contributions + foreign aid and the trident upgrade will be bought and paid for.
It will also generate significant UK employment
What use is a deterrent that cannot and will never be used? Especially one that will cost (If we look at estimates from low to high) between £20b and £164b to renew. Billion.
We are not living in the same world as WW1 or WW2, there is no single country or coalition that can simply be wiped out with a big expensive bomb.
The threats we face in these times are fragmented and dispersed across the globe, nukes are useless against them.
Your arguments about EU contributions is moot, we pay ~£8b net, not in the same ballpark. And wasn't that money meant to be spent on public services, such as the NHS?
![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
Significant employment is a poor argument too, we could try and build a tower to heaven and employ everyone in the country, doesn't make it a sensible idea.
If the cost of Trident wasn't so ridiculous, I might be in favour of it. But the Cold War era is over now, if you really think we should spend £30b plus on defence, for fuck's sake let's spend it on useful things like planes, boats and infantry, not useless bombs that are nothing but an immature statement that amounts to "my dick's bigger than yours!"