Just a thought, as a boyfriend of a girl who runs an organisation of women in IT...
By saying "women are better at X", you're enforcing stereotypes about women. If you say that "By the paradigm of biology women are more complicated, sophisticated and finesse.", you invite questions like: "then what women are worse at, by the paradigm of biology?". You're inviting all the misogynists to say: "yeah, and also, by the paradigm of biology they are worse at programming, overcomplicate things and are generally less intelligent and can't handle science that well." This is *not* the way to go.
Also, even if most women are sophisticated, it doesn't mean that this is due to the biology and not upbringing. Do you have any research to confirm that?
Finally, if you're coming to a forum full of males with a product that says on the front page that most of us are simple brutes incapable of understanding shades of grey between two extremes, don't be surprised if you won't be greeted warmly.
To remain positive though... I think it would be a good idea if you decided what is your target audience really. Is it "sophisticated, finesse" people, or is it women? Because "sophisticated and finesse" is a term that encompasses a plenty of people. You could write about the recent paintings' auction that took place in Poland, or about exclusive products that can be bought using bitcoin, or about beautiful and elegant pieces of technology.
On the other hand, if you really want to target woman, I think it might be a good idea to not exclude women who are more of a geeky type. There are women who are tomboys, geeks, or have aspergers ( as @tjohej mentioned). There are women who are rough, who love tech, fast cars and great pieces of engineering. There are women who don't consider themselves tiny delicate flowers, but who have to deal with everyone treating them like one.
If your site really wants to be for women, you could use it to empower them. Tell them that it's fine if they want to dig deeper into this tech. Show them role models that already do so. Reprint the tech articles written by women. If you really want to bring gender parity to tech, show people that it's okay to be a woman and be interested in tech.
Just as a women who 3 years ago was complete ignorant in IT and now jumps into coding
...
You are wrong. By restraining from saying about differences you'll not make them disappear. This is *not* the way to go. I'm not affraid of misogynists saying bullshit. There are differences, moreover they are well documented and researched. Just google "anxiety women math" or something similar. These differences aren't around statistical error value, are just big. It's ease to notice, just count linux devs by sex. Do the same with students on strict science faculties. Do the same with Nobel Prize winners in strict sciences (even taking into account Matilda effect). Fighting facts by not talking about them is a risky business (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuEQixrBKCc ).
What are reasons of above differencies? As you can read, there is no unified explanation. Partly it's because of culture (and stereotypes that follow), partly biology that plays important role in the way we perceive reality (for example there are multiple studies about hormones impact on mood, aggression, cognitive abilities and more. Start searching from "Nature" and Endocrine Society).
Finally, I came to this forum "full of males" earlier than you and long before accepted rules that shape it. I have absolutely no problem with masculine style of discuss, I hope you too. As to shades of gray - it's sometimes good not to play with shades, pleasing everybody is not my target.
As to target audience - I target women that are geeks, those who just want to know more and those that are only interested in practical use of cryptocurrencies. I do not disriminate any of these groups. You could notice this if you read my page carefully without just sticking to one sentence.
Anyway, thanks for response.