Author

Topic: Weakest hardware to hit the lottery recently (Read 989 times)

newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
December 25, 2015, 04:55:46 AM
#4
Thanks for the answer. Actually I read about the Antminer S3 in another thead. I just thought someone with his r-pi controlled batch of U2 might have stumbled over a block too even though the math doesn't leave much room for this to happen.

But even for an Antminer S3 the odds are so small these days. That's why I rather got an Antminer U3. At least I have some work to do to get an keep this little bugger running Smiley
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
✪ NEXCHANGE | BTC, LTC, ETH & DOGE ✪
December 24, 2015, 07:27:53 PM
#3
Wow that is so nice for an 'old' miner. Thanks for the data. Who knows how much will it take for that same S3 to hit it again...
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
December 24, 2015, 04:20:53 PM
#2
On the solo pool it was an antminer S3 at about 440GH
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
December 24, 2015, 12:10:41 PM
#1
Hi all,
I'm wondering what's the weakest hardware (lowest hashrate) that solved a block by solo mining recently (last 3-6 months). I used the search in this forum and also google search but couldn't find an answer to that question. I also checked the stats of the solo.ck.pool but there are probably a lot of solo miners who might not use a pool at all.

It seems quite a lot of people are playing the lottery with very littte hashing power and I'm just curious if any of them got lucky solving a block.

Roman
PS: I just ordered a U3 to play the lottery as well.
Jump to: